It'd be better to change copy constructor of `EditorDOMPointBase` to explicit,
but it'd require too many changes in editor code. So, this patch just changes
each method callers only.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D30054
This patch marks `EditorBase::InsertNodeTransaction()` **and** its callers as `MOZ_CAN_RUN_SCRIPT`.
Unfortunately, this patch tells us that some `GetSomething()` methods may destroy the editor since `HTMLEditRules::GetNodesForOperation()`, `HTMLEditRules::GetNodesFromPoint()` and `HTMLEditRules::GetNodesFromSelection()` may change the DOM tree. Additionally, initialization methods may destroy the editor since it may insert a bogus `<br>` node.
Note that this patch also removes some unused methods. I.e., they are not result of some cleaning up the code. This patch just avoids marking unused methods as `MOZ_CAN_RUN_SCRIPT`.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D25027
This patch marks `EditorBase::InsertNodeTransaction()` **and** its callers as `MOZ_CAN_RUN_SCRIPT`.
Unfortunately, this patch tells us that some `GetSomething()` methods may destroy the editor since `HTMLEditRules::GetNodesForOperation()`, `HTMLEditRules::GetNodesFromPoint()` and `HTMLEditRules::GetNodesFromSelection()` may change the DOM tree. Additionally, initialization methods may destroy the editor since it may insert a bogus `<br>` node.
Note that this patch also removes some unused methods. I.e., they are not result of some cleaning up the code. This patch just avoids marking unused methods as `MOZ_CAN_RUN_SCRIPT`.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D25027
`Selection::Extend()` is too slow but editor and ContentEventHandler use it in
some places. We should make them use `Selection::SetStartAndEndInLimiter()` or
`Selection::SetBaseAndExtentInLimiter()`. The former is usable only when caller
guarantees the start point is prior to the end point in the DOM tree.
Otherwise, we need to use the latter even though it's slower than the former.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D23462
`Selection::Extend()` is too slow but editor and ContentEventHandler use it in
some places. We should make them use `Selection::SetStartAndEndInLimiter()` or
`Selection::SetBaseAndExtentInLimiter()`. The former is usable only when caller
guarantees the start point is prior to the end point in the DOM tree.
Otherwise, we need to use the latter even though it's slower than the former.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D23462
`PresShell.h` is exposed as `mozilla/PresShell.h` and `PresShell` is the only
concrete class of `nsIPresShell`. Therefore, we have no reason to access
`PresShell` via `nsIPresShell`.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D23277
As far as I've tested, Chrome does not throw exception even when editor is
destroyed or editor content is modified unexpectedly. So, we should return
`NS_OK` from most public methods of editor when internal methods return
`NS_ERROR_EDITOR_DESTROYED` or `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_UNEXPECTED_DOM_TREE`.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D20811
This is a best effort attempt at ensuring that the adverse impact of
reformatting the entire tree over the comments would be minimal. I've used a
combination of strategies including disabling of formatting, some manual
formatting and some changes to formatting to work around some clang-format
limitations.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D13073
This is a best effort attempt at ensuring that the adverse impact of
reformatting the entire tree over the comments would be minimal. I've used a
combination of strategies including disabling of formatting, some manual
formatting and some changes to formatting to work around some clang-format
limitations.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D13073
This is a best effort attempt at ensuring that the adverse impact of
reformatting the entire tree over the comments would be minimal. I've used a
combination of strategies including disabling of formatting, some manual
formatting and some changes to formatting to work around some clang-format
limitations.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D13073
Currently, calling nsITableEditor.insertTableCell() does not cause dispatching
"input" event since it does not create AutoPlaceholderBatch. Additionally,
different from InsertTableRowsWithTransaction() and
InsertTableColumnsWithTransaction(), it does not create
AutoTopLevelEditSubActionNotifier.
Because of those APIs should work similarly, we should make it creates
both auto class instances.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D12248
Now, any protected/private methods of editor classes can refer
SelectionRefPtr() safely. So, we can cut the cost of calling GetSelection()
only once per edit action handling.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D10011
EditorBase::SelectionRefPtr() is now safe to use in editor and really fast to
retrieve Selection than EditorBase::GetSelection(). Therefore, we can get rid of
all Selection pointer/reference argument of each method which always take
normal Selection.
Note that this changes nsIHTMLEditor.checkSelectionStateForAnonymousButtons()
because its argument is only Selection. So, BlueGriffon should work even
though it calls the method with nsIEditor.selection.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D10009
AutoTransactionBatch, AutoPlaceholderBatch, AutoSelectionRestorer,
AutoTopLevelEditSubActionNotifier, AutoTransactionsConserveSelection and
AutoUpdateViewBatch access protected members of EditorBase. The access
scope management assume that they are used only by EditorBase or its
subclasses or TextEditRules or its inherited class (i.e., HTMLEditRules).
For guaranteeing this at build-time, we should change them to nested classes
of EditorBase. Then, EditorBase and its subclasses and friends can use them.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D9479
A lot of loops in HTMLTableEditor.cpp scans cells along column-axis or
row-axis. In those cases, they need to skip columns/rows which are spanned
from prior column/row. So, we can rewrite them with CellData::NextColumnIndex()
or CellData::NextRowColumn().
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D8358
This patch makes all nsITableEditor::GetCellDataAt() use CellData, and if
each caller checks the result of GetCellDataAt() with NS_FAILED(), this
replaces it with CellData::FailedOrNotFound() since GetCellDataAt() returns
error even when it does not find a cell element. Finally, copies each
CellData member to the variable which received corresponding value from
GetCellDataAt() for making this change safe. Note that for easier to review,
the copying blocks have odd indent. Those variables will be removed or
corrected the indent by the following patches.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D8339
nsITableEditor::GetCellDataAt() is an XPCOM method but used internally a lot.
Additionally, it scatters a lot of variables (including unused) since it takes
a lot of out arguments to return. Therefore, this should be implemented as
struct and users should refer each member as result.
This does not replaces the callers yet since it's too risky if the caller is
not tested by automated test. Following patches will replace the method call
and each variable step by step.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D8338
nsITableEditor::InsertTableCell() is an XPCOM method but used internally. So,
HTMLEditor should implement it with a non-virtual method and all internal users
should use it instead.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D6259
nsITableEditor::InsertTableColumn() is an XPCOM method but it's used internally.
So, HTMLEditor should implement it with a non-virtual method and internal
users should use it instead.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D6257
nsITableEditor::InsertTableRow() is an XPCOM method but there are some internal
users. So, HTMLEditor should implement it with a non-virtual method and
it should be used by all internal users.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D6179
HTMLEditor::DeleteTableCellWithTransaction() does not remove <table> element
even if it becomes empty only when 2 or more cell elements are selected.
Therefore, we should check table size before removing a row and if it's the
last row, the method should remove <table>.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D6177
nsITableEditor::DeleteTableCell() is an XPCOM method but used internally.
So, HTMLEditor should implement it with non-virtual method and use it
internally.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D6176
Mirko Brodesser