Bug 1381622: add UI considerations for actions; r=jonasfj

MozReview-Commit-ID: CuhPkD3Xbic

--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 29bc01d9bb6b3700163103383634570985fc059b
This commit is contained in:
Dustin J. Mitchell 2017-07-17 20:39:08 +00:00
parent 601d44ec18
commit 0788e911cb
3 changed files with 88 additions and 12 deletions

View File

@ -213,23 +213,11 @@ User interfaces for triggering actions, like Treeherder, are expected to provide
JSON input that satisfies this schema. These interfaces are also expected to
validate the input against the schema before attempting to trigger the action.
It is expected that such user interfaces will attempt to auto-generate HTML
forms from JSON schema specified. However, a user-interface implementor may also
decide to hand write an HTML form for a particularly common or complex JSON
schema. As long as the input generated from the form conforms to the schema
specified for the given action. To ensure that, implementers should do a deep
comparison between a schema for which a hand-written HTML form exists, and the
schema required by the action.
It is perfectly legal to reference external schemas using
constructs like ``{"$ref": "https://example.com/my-schema.json"}``, in this case
it however strongly recommended that the external resource is available over
HTTPS and allows CORS requests from any source.
In fact, user interface implementors should feel encouraged to publish schemas
for which they have hand written input forms, so that action developers can
use these when applicable.
When writing schemas it is strongly encouraged that the JSON schema
``description`` properties are used to provide detailed descriptions. It is
assumed that consumers will render these ``description`` properties as markdown.

View File

@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
User Interface Considerations
=============================
The actions system decouples in-tree changes from user interface changes by
taking advantage of graceful degradation. User interfaces, when presented with
an unfamiliar action, fall back to a usable default behavior, and can later be
upgraded to handle that action with a more refined approach.
Default Behavior
----------------
Every user interface should support the following:
* Displaying a list of actions relevant to each task, and displaying
task-group tasks for the associated task-group.
* Providing an opportuntity for the user to enter input for an action. This
might be in JSON or YAML, or using a form auto-generated from the action's
JSON-schema. If the action has no schema, this step should be skipped.
The user's input should be validated against the schema.
* For ``action.kind = 'task'``, rendering the template using the JSON-e
library, using the variables described in :doc:`action-spec`.
* Calling ``Queue.createTask`` with the resulting task, using the user's
Taskcluster credentials. See the next section for some important
security-related concerns.
Creating Tasks
--------------
When executing an action, a UI must ensure that the user is authorized to
perform the action, and that the user is not being "tricked" into executing
an unexpected action.
To accomplish the first, the UI should create tasks with the user's Taskcluster
credentials. Do not use credentials configured as part of the service itself!
To accomplish the second, use the decision tasks's ``scopes`` property as the
`authorizedScopes
<https://docs.taskcluster.net/manual/design/apis/hawk/authorized-scopes>`_ for
the ``Queue.createTask`` call. This prevents action tasks from doing anything
the original decision task couldn't do.
Specialized Behavior
--------------------
The default behavior is too clumsy for day-to-day use for common actions. User
interfaces may want to provide a more natural interface that still takes advantage
of the actions system.
Specialized Input
.................
A user interface may provide specialized input forms for specific schemas. The
input generated from the form must conform to the schema.
To ensure that the schema has not changed, implementers should do a deep
comparison between a schema for which a hand-written form exists, and the
schema required by the action. If the two differ, the default behavior should
be used instead.
Specialized Triggering
......................
A user interface may want to trigger a specific action using a dedicated UI
element. For example, an "start interactive session" button might be placed
next to each failing test in a list of tests.
User interfaces should look for the desired action by name. The UI should check
that there is exactly one matching action available for the given task or
task-graph. If multiple actions match, the UI should treat that as an error
(helping to avoid actions being surreptitiously replaced by similarly-named,
malicious actions).
Having discovered the task, the user interface has a choice in how to provide
its input. It can use the "specialized input" approach outlined above, providing
a customized form if the action's schema is recognized and gracefully degrading
if not.
But if the user interface is generating the input internally, it may instead
validate that generated input against the action's schema as given, proceeding
if validation succeeds. In this alternative, there is no need to do a deep
comparison of the schema. This approach allows in-tree changes that introduce
backward-compatible changes to the schema, without breaking support in user
interfaces. Of course, if the changes are not backward-compatibile, breakage
will ensue.

View File

@ -24,4 +24,5 @@ At a very high level, the process looks like this:
.. toctree::
action-spec
action-uis
action-implementation