mirror of
https://github.com/mozilla/gecko-dev.git
synced 2024-11-24 05:11:16 +00:00
Bug 1879244 - Add documentation for greening up tests with --new-test-config. r=aryx
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D201041
This commit is contained in:
Joel Maher
parent
86107ae8e9
commit
41e1354d68
@ -7,173 +7,96 @@ get to this stage, you will have seen a try push with all the tests running
|
||||
available to run tests.
|
||||
|
||||
For the purpose of this document, assume you are tasked with upgrading Windows
|
||||
10 OS from 1803 -> 1903. To simplify this we can call this `windows_1903`, and
|
||||
we need to:
|
||||
10 OS from version 1803 -> 1903. To simplify this we can call this `windows_1903`,
|
||||
and we need to:
|
||||
|
||||
* create meta bug
|
||||
* push to try
|
||||
* analyze test failures
|
||||
* disable tests in manifests
|
||||
* repeat try push until no failures
|
||||
* run skip-fails
|
||||
* repeat 2 more times
|
||||
* land changes and turn on tests
|
||||
* turn on run only failures
|
||||
* file bugs for test failures
|
||||
|
||||
There are many edge cases, and I will outline them inside each step.
|
||||
If you are running this manually or on configs/tests that are not supported with
|
||||
`./mach try --new-test-config`, then please follow the steps `here <manual.html>`__
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Create Meta Bug
|
||||
---------------
|
||||
|
||||
This is a simple step where you create a meta bug to track the failures associated
|
||||
with the tests you are greening up. If this is a test suite (i.e. `devtools`), it
|
||||
is ok to have a meta bug just for the test suite and the new platform.
|
||||
|
||||
All bugs related to tests skipped or failing will be blocking this meta bug.
|
||||
|
||||
Push to Try Server
|
||||
------------------
|
||||
|
||||
As you have new machines (or cloud instances) available with the updated
|
||||
OS/config, it is time to push to try.
|
||||
Now that you have a configuration setup and machines available via try server, it
|
||||
is time to run try. If you are migrating mochitest or xpcshell, then you can do:
|
||||
|
||||
In order to run all tests, we would need to execute:
|
||||
``./mach try fuzzy --no-artifact -q 'test-windows !-raptor- !-talos- --rebuild 5``
|
||||
``./mach try fuzzy --no-artifact --full --rebuild 10 --new-task-config -q 'test-windows10-64-1903 mochitest-browser-chrome !ccov !ship !browsertime !talos !asan'``
|
||||
|
||||
There are a few exceptions here:
|
||||
This will run many tests (thanks to --full and --rebuild 10), but will give plenty
|
||||
of useful data.
|
||||
|
||||
* Perf tests don't need to be run (hence the ``!-raptor- !-talos-``)
|
||||
* Need to make sure we are not building with artifact builds (hence the
|
||||
``--no-artifact``)
|
||||
* There are jobs hidden behind tier-3, some for a good reason (code coverage is
|
||||
a good example, but fission tests might not be green)
|
||||
In the scenario you are migrating tests such as:
|
||||
* performance
|
||||
* web-platform-tests
|
||||
* reftest / crashtest / jsreftest
|
||||
* mochitest-webgl (has a different process for test skipping)
|
||||
* cppunittest / gtest / junit
|
||||
* marionette / firefox-ui / telemetry
|
||||
|
||||
The last piece to sort out is running on the new config, here are some
|
||||
considerations for new configs:
|
||||
then please follow the steps `here <manual.html>`__
|
||||
|
||||
* duplicated jobs (i.e. fission, a11y-checks), you can just run those specific
|
||||
tasks: ``./mach try fuzzy --no-artifact -q 'test-windows fission --rebuild
|
||||
5``
|
||||
* new OS/hardware (i.e. aarch64, os upgrade), you need to reference the new
|
||||
hardware, typically this is with ``--worker-override``: ``./mach try fuzzy
|
||||
--no-artifact -q 'test-windows --rebuild 5 --worker-override
|
||||
t-win10-64=gecko-t/t-win10-64-1903``
|
||||
If you are migrating to a small machine pool, it is best to avoid `--rebuild 10` and
|
||||
instead do `--rebuild 3`. Likewise please limit your jobs to be the specific test
|
||||
suite and variant. The size of a worker pool is shown at the Workers page of the
|
||||
Taskcluster instance.
|
||||
|
||||
* the risk here is a scenario where hardware is limited, then ``--rebuild
|
||||
5`` will create too many tasks and some will expire.
|
||||
* in low hardware situations, either run a subset of tests (i.e.
|
||||
web-platform-tests, mochitest), or ``--rebuild 2`` and repeat.
|
||||
Run skip-fails
|
||||
--------------
|
||||
|
||||
When the try push is completed it is time to run skip-fails. Skip-fails will
|
||||
look at all the test results and automatically create a set of local changes
|
||||
with skip-if conditions to green up the tests faster.
|
||||
|
||||
``./mach manifest skip-fails --b bugzilla.mozilla.org -m <meta_bug_id> --turbo "https://treeherder.mozilla.org/jobs?repo=try&revision=<rev>"``
|
||||
|
||||
Please input the proper `meta_bug_id` and `rev` into the above command.
|
||||
|
||||
The first time running this, you will need to get a `bugzilla api key <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=apikey>`__. copy
|
||||
this key and add it to your `~/.config/python-bugzilla/bugzilla-rc` file:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: none
|
||||
|
||||
cat bugzillarc
|
||||
[DEFAULT]
|
||||
url = https://bugzilla.mozilla.org
|
||||
[bugzilla.mozilla.org]
|
||||
api_key = <key>
|
||||
|
||||
When the command finishes, you will have new bugs created that are blocking the
|
||||
meta bug. In addition you will have many changes to manifests adding skip-if
|
||||
conditions. For tests than fail 40% of the time or for entire manifests that
|
||||
take >20 minutes to run on opt or >40 minutes on debug.
|
||||
|
||||
You will need to create a commit (or `--amend` your previous commit if this is round 2 or 3):
|
||||
|
||||
``hg commit -m "Bug <meta_bug_id> - Green up tests for <suite> on <platform>"``
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Analyze Test Failures
|
||||
---------------------
|
||||
Repeat 2 More Times
|
||||
-------------------
|
||||
|
||||
A try push will take many hours, it is best to push in the afternoon, ensure
|
||||
some jobs are running, then come back the next day.
|
||||
In 3 rounds this should be complete and ready to submit for review and turn on
|
||||
the new tests.
|
||||
|
||||
The best way to look at test failures is to use Push Health to avoid misleading
|
||||
data. Push Health will bucket failures into possible regressions, known
|
||||
regression, etc. When looking at 5 data points (from ``--rebuild 5``), this
|
||||
will filter out intermittent failures.
|
||||
There will be additional failures, those will follow the normal process of
|
||||
intermittents.
|
||||
|
||||
There are many reasons you might have invalid or misleading data:
|
||||
|
||||
# Tests fail intermittently, we need a pattern to know if it is consistent or
|
||||
intermittent.
|
||||
# We still want to disable high frequency intermittent tests, those are just
|
||||
annoying.
|
||||
# You could be pushing off a bad base revision (regression or intermittent that
|
||||
comes from the base revision).
|
||||
# The machines you run on could be bad, skewing the data.
|
||||
# Infrastructure problems could cause jobs to fail at random places, repeated
|
||||
jobs filter that out.
|
||||
# Some failures could affect future tests in the same browser session or tasks.
|
||||
# If a crash occurs, or we timeout- it is possible that we will not run all of
|
||||
the tests in the task, therefore believing a test was run 5 times, but maybe it
|
||||
was only run once (and failed), or never run at all.
|
||||
# Task failures that do not have a test name (leak on shutdown, crash on
|
||||
shutdown, timeout on shutdown, etc.)
|
||||
|
||||
That is a long list of reasons to not trust the data, luckily most of the time
|
||||
using ``--rebuild 5`` will give us enough data to give enough confidence we
|
||||
found all failures and can ignore random/intermittent failures.
|
||||
|
||||
Knowing the reasons for misleading data, here is a way to use `Push Health
|
||||
<https://treeherder.mozilla.org/push-health/push?revision=abaff26f8e084ac719bea0438dba741ace3cf5d8&repo=try&testGroup=pr>`__.
|
||||
|
||||
* Alternatively, you could use the `API
|
||||
<https://treeherder.mozilla.org/api/project/try/push/health/?revision=abaff26f8e084ac719bea0438dba741ace3cf5d8>`__
|
||||
to get raw data and work towards building a tool
|
||||
* If you write a tool, you need to parse the resulting JSON file and keep in
|
||||
mind to build a list of failures and match it with a list of jobnames to find
|
||||
how many times the job ran and failed/passed.
|
||||
|
||||
The main goal here is to know what <path>/<filenames> are failing, and having a
|
||||
list of those. Ideally you would record some additional information like
|
||||
timeout, crash, failure, etc. In the end you might end up with::
|
||||
|
||||
dom/html/test/test_fullscreen-api.html, scrollbar
|
||||
gfx/layers/apz/test/mochitest/test_group_hittest.html, scrollbar
|
||||
image/test/mochitest/test_animSVGImage.html, timeout
|
||||
browser/base/content/test/general/browser_restore_isAppTab.js, crashed
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Disable Tests in the Manifest Files
|
||||
-----------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
This part of the process can seem tedious and is difficult to automate without
|
||||
making our manifests easier to access programatically.
|
||||
|
||||
The code sheriffs have been using `this documentation
|
||||
<https://wiki.mozilla.org/Auto-tools/Projects/Stockwell/disable-recommended>`__
|
||||
for training and reference when they disable intermittents.
|
||||
|
||||
First you need to add a keyword to be available in the manifest (e.g. ``skip-if
|
||||
= windows_1903``).
|
||||
|
||||
There are many exceptions, the bulk of the work will fall into one of 4
|
||||
categories:
|
||||
|
||||
# `manifestparser <mochitest_xpcshell_manifest_keywords>`_: \*.ini (mochitest*,
|
||||
firefox-ui, marionette, xpcshell) easy to edit by adding a ``fail-if =
|
||||
windows_1903 # <comment>``, a few exceptions here
|
||||
# `reftest <reftest_manifest_keywords>`_: \*.list (reftest, crashtest) need to
|
||||
add a ``fuzzy-if(windows_1903, A, B)``, this is more specific
|
||||
# web-platform-test: testing/web-platform/meta/\*\*.ini (wpt, wpt-reftest,
|
||||
etc.) need to edit/add testing/web-platform/meta/<path>/<testname>.ini, and add
|
||||
expected results
|
||||
# Other (compiled tests, jsreftest, etc.) edit source code, ask for help.
|
||||
|
||||
Basically we want to take every non intermittent failure found from push health
|
||||
and edit the manifest, this typically means:
|
||||
|
||||
* Finding the proper manifest.
|
||||
* Adding the right text to the manifest.
|
||||
|
||||
To find the proper manifest, it is typically <path>/<harness>.[ini|list].
|
||||
There are exceptions and if in doubt use searchfox.org/ to find the manifest
|
||||
which contains the testname.
|
||||
|
||||
Once you have the manifest, open it in an editor, and search for the exact test
|
||||
name (there could be similar named tests).
|
||||
|
||||
Rerun Try Push, Repeat as Necessary
|
||||
-----------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
It is important to test your changes and for a new platform that will be
|
||||
sheriffed, to rerun all the tests at scale.
|
||||
|
||||
With your change in a commit, push again to try with ``--rebuild 5`` and come
|
||||
back the next day.
|
||||
|
||||
As there are so many edge cases, it is quite likely that you will have more
|
||||
failures, mentally plan on 3 iterations of this, where each iteration has fewer
|
||||
failures.
|
||||
|
||||
Once you get a full push to show no persistent failures, it is time to land
|
||||
those changes and turn on the new tests. There is a large risk here that the
|
||||
longer you take to find all failures, the greater the chance of:
|
||||
|
||||
* Bitrot of your patch
|
||||
* New tests being added which could fail on your config
|
||||
* Other edits to tests/tools which could affect your new config
|
||||
|
||||
Since the new config process is designed to find failures fast and get the
|
||||
changes landed fast, we do not need to ask developers for review, that comes
|
||||
after the new config is running successfully where we notify the teams of what
|
||||
tests are failing.
|
||||
|
||||
Land Changes and Turn on Tests
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
@ -205,18 +128,3 @@ mochitest-gpu, browser-chrome, devtools, web-platform-tests, crashtest, etc.),
|
||||
there will need to be a corresponding tier-3 job that is created.
|
||||
|
||||
TODO: point to examples of how to add this after we get our first jobs running.
|
||||
|
||||
File Bugs for Test Failures
|
||||
---------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Once the failure jobs are running on mozilla-central, now we have full coverage
|
||||
and the ability to run tests on try server. There could be >100 tests that are
|
||||
marked as ``fail-if`` and that would take a lot of time to file bugs. Instead
|
||||
we will file a bug for each manifest that is edited, typically this reduces the
|
||||
bugs to about 40% the total tests (average out to 2.5 test failures/manifest).
|
||||
|
||||
When filing the bug, indicate the timeline, how to run the failure, link to the
|
||||
bug where we created the config, describe briefly the config change (i.e.
|
||||
upgrade windows 10 rom version 1803 to 1903), and finally needinfo the triage
|
||||
owner indicating this is a heads up and these tests are running reguarly on
|
||||
mozilla-central for the next 6-7 weeks.
|
||||
|
||||
224
testing/docs/tests-for-new-config/manual.rst
Normal file
224
testing/docs/tests-for-new-config/manual.rst
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,224 @@
|
||||
:orphan:
|
||||
|
||||
Turning on Firefox tests for a new configuration (manual)
|
||||
=========================================================
|
||||
|
||||
You are ready to go with turning on Firefox tests for a new config. Once you
|
||||
get to this stage, you will have seen a try push with all the tests running
|
||||
(many not green) to verify some tests pass and there are enough machines
|
||||
available to run tests.
|
||||
|
||||
For the purpose of this document, assume you are tasked with upgrading Windows
|
||||
10 OS from 1803 -> 1903. To simplify this we can call this `windows_1903`, and
|
||||
we need to:
|
||||
|
||||
* push to try
|
||||
* analyze test failures
|
||||
* disable tests in manifests
|
||||
* repeat try push until no failures
|
||||
* file bugs for test failures
|
||||
* land changes and turn on tests
|
||||
* turn on run only failures
|
||||
|
||||
There are many edge cases, and I will outline them inside each step.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Push to Try Server
|
||||
------------------
|
||||
|
||||
As you have new machines (or cloud instances) available with the updated
|
||||
OS/config, it is time to push to try.
|
||||
|
||||
In order to run all tests, we would need to execute:
|
||||
``./mach try fuzzy --no-artifact -q 'test-windows !-raptor- !-talos- --rebuild 10``
|
||||
|
||||
There are a few exceptions here:
|
||||
|
||||
* Perf tests don't need to be run (hence the ``!-raptor- !-talos-``)
|
||||
* Need to make sure we are not building with artifact builds (hence the
|
||||
``--no-artifact``)
|
||||
* There are jobs hidden behind tier-3, some for a good reason (code coverage is
|
||||
a good example, but fission tests might not be green)
|
||||
|
||||
The last piece to sort out is running on the new config, here are some
|
||||
considerations for new configs:
|
||||
|
||||
* duplicated jobs (i.e. fission, a11y-checks), you can just run those specific
|
||||
tasks: ``./mach try fuzzy --no-artifact -q 'test-windows fission --rebuild
|
||||
5``
|
||||
* new OS/hardware (i.e. aarch64, os upgrade), you need to reference the new
|
||||
hardware, typically this is with ``--worker-override``: ``./mach try fuzzy
|
||||
--no-artifact -q 'test-windows --rebuild 10 --worker-override
|
||||
t-win10-64=gecko-t/t-win10-64-1903``
|
||||
|
||||
* the risk here is a scenario where hardware is limited, then ``--rebuild
|
||||
10`` will create too many tasks and some will expire.
|
||||
* in low hardware situations, either run a subset of tests (i.e.
|
||||
web-platform-tests, mochitest), or ``--rebuild 3`` and repeat.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Analyze Test Failures
|
||||
---------------------
|
||||
|
||||
A try push will take many hours, it is best to push when you start work and
|
||||
then results will be ready later in your day, or push at the end of your day
|
||||
and results will be ready when you come back to work the next day. Please
|
||||
make sure some tasks start before walking away, otherwise a small typo can
|
||||
delay this process by hours or a full day.
|
||||
|
||||
The best way to look at test failures is to use Push Health to avoid misleading
|
||||
data. Push Health will bucket failures into possible regressions, known
|
||||
regression, etc. When looking at 5 data points (from ``--rebuild 10``), this
|
||||
will filter out intermittent failures.
|
||||
|
||||
There are many reasons you might have invalid or misleading data:
|
||||
|
||||
# Tests fail intermittently, we need a pattern to know if it is consistent or
|
||||
intermittent.
|
||||
# We still want to disable high frequency intermittent tests, those are just
|
||||
annoying.
|
||||
# You could be pushing off a bad base revision (regression or intermittent that
|
||||
comes from the base revision).
|
||||
# The machines you run on could be bad, skewing the data.
|
||||
# Infrastructure problems could cause jobs to fail at random places, repeated
|
||||
jobs filter that out.
|
||||
# Some failures could affect future tests in the same browser session or tasks.
|
||||
# If a crash occurs, or we timeout- it is possible that we will not run all of
|
||||
the tests in the task, therefore believing a test was run 5 times, but maybe it
|
||||
was only run once (and failed), or never run at all.
|
||||
# Task failures that do not have a test name (leak on shutdown, crash on
|
||||
shutdown, timeout on shutdown, etc.)
|
||||
|
||||
That is a long list of reasons to not trust the data, luckily most of the time
|
||||
using ``--rebuild 10`` will give us enough data to give enough confidence we
|
||||
found all failures and can ignore random/intermittent failures.
|
||||
|
||||
Knowing the reasons for misleading data, here is a way to use `Push Health
|
||||
<https://treeherder.mozilla.org/push-health/push?revision=abaff26f8e084ac719bea0438dba741ace3cf5d8&repo=try&testGroup=pr>`__.
|
||||
|
||||
* Alternatively, you could use the `API
|
||||
<https://treeherder.mozilla.org/api/project/try/push/health/?revision=abaff26f8e084ac719bea0438dba741ace3cf5d8>`__
|
||||
to get raw data and work towards building a tool
|
||||
* If you write a tool, you need to parse the resulting JSON file and keep in
|
||||
mind to build a list of failures and match it with a list of jobnames to find
|
||||
how many times the job ran and failed/passed.
|
||||
|
||||
The main goal here is to know what <path>/<filenames> are failing, and having a
|
||||
list of those. Ideally you would record some additional information like
|
||||
timeout, crash, failure, etc. In the end you might end up with::
|
||||
|
||||
dom/html/test/test_fullscreen-api.html, scrollbar
|
||||
gfx/layers/apz/test/mochitest/test_group_hittest.html, scrollbar
|
||||
image/test/mochitest/test_animSVGImage.html, timeout
|
||||
browser/base/content/test/general/browser_restore_isAppTab.js, crashed
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Disable Tests in the Manifest Files
|
||||
-----------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
The code sheriffs have been using `this documentation
|
||||
<https://wiki.mozilla.org/Auto-tools/Projects/Stockwell/disable-recommended>`__
|
||||
for training and reference when they disable intermittents.
|
||||
|
||||
First you need to add a keyword to be available in the manifest (e.g. ``skip-if
|
||||
= windows_1903``).
|
||||
|
||||
There are many exceptions, the bulk of the work will fall into one of 4
|
||||
categories:
|
||||
|
||||
# `manifestparser <mochitest_xpcshell_manifest_keywords>`_: \*.toml (mochitest*,
|
||||
firefox-ui, marionette, xpcshell) easy to edit by adding a ``skip-if =
|
||||
windows_1903 # <comment>``, a few exceptions here
|
||||
# `reftest <reftest_manifest_keywords>`_: \*.list (reftest, crashtest) need to
|
||||
add a ``fuzzy-if(windows_1903, A, B)``, this is more specific
|
||||
# web-platform-test: testing/web-platform/meta/\*\*.ini (wpt, wpt-reftest,
|
||||
etc.) need to edit/add testing/web-platform/meta/<path>/<testname>.ini, and add
|
||||
expected results
|
||||
# Other (compiled tests, jsreftest, etc.) edit source code, ask for help.
|
||||
|
||||
Basically we want to take every non-intermittent failure found from push health
|
||||
and edit the manifest, this typically means:
|
||||
|
||||
* Finding the proper manifest.
|
||||
* Adding the right text to the manifest.
|
||||
|
||||
To find the proper manifest, it is typically <path>/<harness>.[toml|list].
|
||||
There are exceptions and if in doubt use searchfox.org/ to find the manifest
|
||||
which contains the testname.
|
||||
|
||||
Once you have the manifest, open it in an editor, and search for the exact test
|
||||
name (there could be similar named tests).
|
||||
|
||||
Rerun Try Push, Repeat as Necessary
|
||||
-----------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
It is important to test your changes and for a new platform that will be
|
||||
sheriffed, to rerun all the tests at scale.
|
||||
|
||||
With your change in a commit, push again to try with ``--rebuild 10`` and come
|
||||
back the next day.
|
||||
|
||||
As there are so many edge cases, it is quite likely that you will have more
|
||||
failures, mentally plan on 3 iterations of this, where each iteration has fewer
|
||||
failures.
|
||||
|
||||
Once you get a full push to show no persistent failures, it is time to land
|
||||
those changes and turn on the new tests. There is a large risk here that the
|
||||
longer you take to find all failures, the greater the chance of:
|
||||
|
||||
* Bitrot of your patch
|
||||
* New tests being added which could fail on your config
|
||||
* Other edits to tests/tools which could affect your new config
|
||||
|
||||
Since the new config process is designed to find failures fast and get the
|
||||
changes landed fast, we do not need to ask developers for review, that comes
|
||||
after the new config is running successfully where we notify the teams of what
|
||||
tests are failing.
|
||||
|
||||
File Bugs for Test Failures
|
||||
---------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Once the failure jobs are running on mozilla-central, now we have full coverage
|
||||
and the ability to run tests on try server. There could be >100 tests that are
|
||||
marked as ``skip-if`` and that would take a lot of time to file bugs. Instead
|
||||
we will file a bug for each manifest that is edited, typically this reduces the
|
||||
bugs to about 40% the total tests (average out to 2.5 test failures/manifest).
|
||||
|
||||
When filing the bug, indicate the timeline, how to run the failure, link to the
|
||||
bug where we created the config, describe briefly the config change (i.e.
|
||||
upgrade windows 10 from version 1803 to 1903), and finally needinfo the triage
|
||||
owner indicating this is a heads up and these tests are running reguarly on
|
||||
mozilla-central for the next 6-7 weeks.
|
||||
|
||||
Land Changes and Turn on Tests
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
After you have a green test run, it is time to land the patches. There could
|
||||
be changes needed to the taskgraph in order to add the new hardware type and
|
||||
duplicate tests to run on both the old and the new, or create a new variant and
|
||||
denote which tests to run on that variant.
|
||||
|
||||
Using our example of ``windows_1903``, this would be a new worker type that
|
||||
would require these edits:
|
||||
|
||||
* `transforms/tests.py <https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/taskcluster/taskgraph/transforms/tests.py#97>`__ (duplicate windows 10 entries)
|
||||
* `test-platforms.py <https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/taskcluster/ci/test/test-platforms.yml#229>`__ (copy windows10 debug/opt/shippable/asan entries and make win10_1903)
|
||||
* `test-sets.py <https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/taskcluster/ci/test/test-sets.yml#293>`__ (ideally you need nothing, otherwise copy ``windows-tests`` and edit the test list)
|
||||
|
||||
In general this should allow you to have tests scheduled with no custom flags
|
||||
in try server and all of these will be scheduled by default on
|
||||
``mozilla-central``, ``autoland``, and ``release-branches``.
|
||||
|
||||
Turn on Run Only Failures
|
||||
-------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Now that we have tests running regularly, the next step is to take all the
|
||||
disabled tests and run them in the special failures job.
|
||||
|
||||
We have a basic framework created, but for every test harness (i.e. xpcshell,
|
||||
mochitest-gpu, browser-chrome, devtools, web-platform-tests, crashtest, etc.),
|
||||
there will need to be a corresponding tier-3 job that is created.
|
||||
|
||||
TODO: point to examples of how to add this after we get our first jobs running.
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user