another tiny tweak to docs

This commit is contained in:
rickg%netscape.com 1999-09-02 07:13:56 +00:00
parent ac8dfadb6d
commit 8795a355d4
3 changed files with 15 additions and 15 deletions

View File

@ -104,7 +104,7 @@
-----------------------------------
Note: The i18n folks will stenously object if we get too carried away with the
Note: The i18n folks will stenuously object if we get too carried away with the
use of nsCString's that pass interface boundaries. Try to limit your
use of these to external interfaces that demand them, or for your own
private purposes in cases where they'll never be seen by humans.
@ -130,7 +130,7 @@
(after all, the whole point is to avoid a heap allocation of the buffer).
4) Consider using nsString to write into your arbitrarily-sized stack buffers, rather
4) Consider using an autoString to write into your arbitrarily-sized stack buffers, rather
than it's own buffers.
For example, let's say you're going to call printf() to emit pretty-printed debug output
@ -151,9 +151,9 @@
}
The assignment statment to s3 will cause the given string to be written to your
stack-based buffer via the normal nsString interfaces. Cool, huh? Note however
that just like any other nsString use, if you write more data than will fit in
the buffer, nsString *will* go to the heap.
stack-based buffer via the normal nsString/nsCString interfaces. Cool, huh?
Note however that just like any other nsStringXXX use, if you write more data
than will fit in the buffer, a visit to the heap manager will be in order.
**********************************************************************************/

View File

@ -104,7 +104,7 @@
-----------------------------------
Note: The i18n folks will stenously object if we get too carried away with the
Note: The i18n folks will stenuously object if we get too carried away with the
use of nsCString's that pass interface boundaries. Try to limit your
use of these to external interfaces that demand them, or for your own
private purposes in cases where they'll never be seen by humans.
@ -130,7 +130,7 @@
(after all, the whole point is to avoid a heap allocation of the buffer).
4) Consider using nsString to write into your arbitrarily-sized stack buffers, rather
4) Consider using an autoString to write into your arbitrarily-sized stack buffers, rather
than it's own buffers.
For example, let's say you're going to call printf() to emit pretty-printed debug output
@ -151,9 +151,9 @@
}
The assignment statment to s3 will cause the given string to be written to your
stack-based buffer via the normal nsString interfaces. Cool, huh? Note however
that just like any other nsString use, if you write more data than will fit in
the buffer, nsString *will* go to the heap.
stack-based buffer via the normal nsString/nsCString interfaces. Cool, huh?
Note however that just like any other nsStringXXX use, if you write more data
than will fit in the buffer, a visit to the heap manager will be in order.
**********************************************************************************/

View File

@ -104,7 +104,7 @@
-----------------------------------
Note: The i18n folks will stenously object if we get too carried away with the
Note: The i18n folks will stenuously object if we get too carried away with the
use of nsCString's that pass interface boundaries. Try to limit your
use of these to external interfaces that demand them, or for your own
private purposes in cases where they'll never be seen by humans.
@ -130,7 +130,7 @@
(after all, the whole point is to avoid a heap allocation of the buffer).
4) Consider using nsString to write into your arbitrarily-sized stack buffers, rather
4) Consider using an autoString to write into your arbitrarily-sized stack buffers, rather
than it's own buffers.
For example, let's say you're going to call printf() to emit pretty-printed debug output
@ -151,9 +151,9 @@
}
The assignment statment to s3 will cause the given string to be written to your
stack-based buffer via the normal nsString interfaces. Cool, huh? Note however
that just like any other nsString use, if you write more data than will fit in
the buffer, nsString *will* go to the heap.
stack-based buffer via the normal nsString/nsCString interfaces. Cool, huh?
Note however that just like any other nsStringXXX use, if you write more data
than will fit in the buffer, a visit to the heap manager will be in order.
**********************************************************************************/