mirror of
https://github.com/mozilla/gecko-dev.git
synced 2025-01-30 18:31:08 +00:00
Bug 828787. Stop allowing indexed expandos on windows. r=peterv
This commit is contained in:
parent
70b1ad514d
commit
cc38c59fa3
@ -652,9 +652,12 @@ bool
|
||||
nsOuterWindowProxy::defineProperty(JSContext* cx, JSObject* proxy,
|
||||
jsid id, JSPropertyDescriptor* desc)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (nsCOMPtr<nsIDOMWindow> frame = GetSubframeWindow(cx, proxy, id)) {
|
||||
// Don't define anything; we're done here, since the spec requires
|
||||
// that we treat our indexed properties as readonly.
|
||||
int32_t index = GetArrayIndexFromId(cx, id);
|
||||
if (IsArrayIndex(index)) {
|
||||
// Spec says to Reject whether this is a supported index or not,
|
||||
// since we have no indexed setter or indexed creator. That means
|
||||
// throwing in strict mode (FIXME: Bug 828137), doing nothing in
|
||||
// non-strict mode.
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -682,12 +685,19 @@ nsOuterWindowProxy::delete_(JSContext *cx, JSObject *proxy, jsid id,
|
||||
bool *bp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (nsCOMPtr<nsIDOMWindow> frame = GetSubframeWindow(cx, proxy, id)) {
|
||||
// Reject (which means throw if and only if strict) the set.
|
||||
// Reject (which means throw if strict, else return false) the delete.
|
||||
// Except we don't even know whether we're strict. See bug 803157.
|
||||
*bp = false;
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int32_t index = GetArrayIndexFromId(cx, id);
|
||||
if (IsArrayIndex(index)) {
|
||||
// Indexed, but not supported. Spec says return true.
|
||||
*bp = true;
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return js::Wrapper::delete_(cx, proxy, id, bp);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -755,7 +765,8 @@ bool
|
||||
nsOuterWindowProxy::set(JSContext *cx, JSObject *proxy, JSObject *receiver,
|
||||
jsid id, bool strict, JS::Value *vp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (nsCOMPtr<nsIDOMWindow> frame = GetSubframeWindow(cx, proxy, id)) {
|
||||
int32_t index = GetArrayIndexFromId(cx, id);
|
||||
if (IsArrayIndex(index)) {
|
||||
// Reject (which means throw if and only if strict) the set.
|
||||
if (strict) {
|
||||
// XXXbz This needs to throw, but see bug 828137.
|
||||
|
@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
|
||||
|
||||
<!DOCTYPE HTML>
|
||||
<html>
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
@ -26,13 +27,13 @@ https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=823228
|
||||
ok("1" in window, "We have two subframes");
|
||||
ok(!("2" in window), "But we don't have three subframes");
|
||||
window[2] = "myString";
|
||||
ok("2" in window, "Should be able to set expando");
|
||||
ok(!("2" in window), "Should not be able to set indexed expando");
|
||||
Object.getPrototypeOf(window)[3] = "Hey there";
|
||||
ok("3" in window, "Should be walking up the proto chain");
|
||||
|
||||
is(window[0].name, "x", "First frame is x");
|
||||
is(window[1].name, "y", "Second frame is y");
|
||||
is(window[2], "myString", "We should still have our expando");
|
||||
is(window[2], undefined, "We should still not have our expando");
|
||||
is(window[3], "Hey there", "We should still have our prop on the proto chain");
|
||||
|
||||
var x = $("x");
|
||||
@ -57,31 +58,28 @@ https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=823228
|
||||
is(window[1], undefined, "We should not have a value here either");
|
||||
|
||||
// More set() hook test
|
||||
window[1] = "PASS";
|
||||
is(window[1], "PASS", "Should be able to set expando on window[1] now");
|
||||
window[1] = "FAIL3";
|
||||
ok(!("1" in window), "We shouldn't allow indexed expandos");
|
||||
is(window[1], undefined, "We should not have a value for an indexed expando");
|
||||
var desc = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(window, "1");
|
||||
ok(desc.configurable, "Expando should be configurable");
|
||||
ok(desc.enumerable, "Expando should be configurable");
|
||||
ok(desc.writable, "Expando should be writable");
|
||||
is(desc.value, "PASS", "Expando should have correct value");
|
||||
is(desc, undefined, "We really really shouldn't have indexed expandos");
|
||||
|
||||
// Sneaky shadowing (get() hook)
|
||||
x.parentNode.appendChild(y);
|
||||
is(window[1], y.contentWindow, "Second frame should now shadow expando");
|
||||
is(window[1], y.contentWindow, "Second frame should now be visible");
|
||||
desc = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(window, "1");
|
||||
ok(desc.configurable, "Subframe should be configurable");
|
||||
ok(desc.enumerable, "Subframe should be configurable");
|
||||
ok(!desc.writable, "Subframe should not be writable");
|
||||
is(desc.value, y.contentWindow, "Subframe should have correct value");
|
||||
|
||||
// And unshadowing
|
||||
y.parentNode.removeChild(y);
|
||||
is(window[1], "PASS", "And now we should be able to see the expando again");
|
||||
is(window[1], undefined, "And now we should be back to no [1] property");
|
||||
|
||||
// And more defineProperty()
|
||||
Object.defineProperty(window, "1", { value: "PASS2", configurable: true,
|
||||
Object.defineProperty(window, "1", { value: "FAIL2", configurable: true,
|
||||
writable: true })
|
||||
is(window[1], "PASS2", "Defining past end of list should work");
|
||||
ok(!("1" in window), "Defining indexed properties really just shouldn't work");
|
||||
is(window[1], undefined, "Defining past end of list should not work");
|
||||
|
||||
// Enumeration tests
|
||||
x.parentNode.appendChild(y);
|
||||
@ -89,7 +87,7 @@ https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=823228
|
||||
var names = Object.getOwnPropertyNames(window);
|
||||
is(names[0], "0", "Must start with 0");
|
||||
is(names[1], "1", "Must continue with 1");
|
||||
isnot(names.indexOf("2"), -1, "And then 2, defined earlier, should be in there");
|
||||
is(names.indexOf("2"), -1, "And 2, an attempted expando, should not be in there");
|
||||
is(names.indexOf("3"), -1, "But no 3; that's on the proto");
|
||||
|
||||
names = [];
|
||||
@ -98,19 +96,19 @@ https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=823228
|
||||
}
|
||||
is(names[0], "0", "Enumeration must start with 0");
|
||||
is(names[1], "1", "Enumeration must continue with 1");
|
||||
isnot(names.indexOf("2"), -1, "Enumeration: and then 2, defined earlier");
|
||||
is(names.indexOf("2"), -1, "Enumeration: but no expando 2");
|
||||
isnot(names.indexOf("3"), -1, "Enumeration: and then 3, defined on the proto");
|
||||
is(names.indexOf("4"), -1, "But no 4 around");
|
||||
|
||||
// Delete tests
|
||||
delete window[1];
|
||||
is(delete window[1], false, "Deleting supported index should return false");
|
||||
is(window[1], y.contentWindow, "Shouldn't be able to delete a supported index");
|
||||
y.parentNode.removeChild(y);
|
||||
is(window[1], "PASS2",
|
||||
"And shouldn't have deleted the thing we were shadowing either");
|
||||
delete window[1];
|
||||
is(window[1], undefined,
|
||||
"But should be able to delete unshadowed things");
|
||||
"And now we should have no property here");
|
||||
is(delete window[1], true, "Deleting unsupported index should return true");
|
||||
is(window[1], undefined,
|
||||
"And we shouldn't have things magically appear due to delete");
|
||||
</script>
|
||||
</body>
|
||||
</html>
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user