mirror of
https://github.com/mozilla/gecko-dev.git
synced 2024-11-30 00:01:50 +00:00
now rely on "nscore.h" for NS_REINTERPRET_CAST instead of defining my own. now relying on autoconf system for all unixes. Some tests may need to be fixed.
This commit is contained in:
parent
4626b3f96a
commit
eee168d553
@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ void
|
||||
nsCOMPtr_base::assign_with_QueryInterface( nsISupports* rawPtr, const nsIID& iid, nsresult* result )
|
||||
{
|
||||
nsresult status = NS_OK;
|
||||
if ( !rawPtr || !NS_SUCCEEDED( status = rawPtr->QueryInterface(iid, NSCAP_REINTERPRET_CAST(void**, &rawPtr)) ) )
|
||||
if ( !rawPtr || !NS_SUCCEEDED( status = rawPtr->QueryInterface(iid, NS_REINTERPRET_CAST(void**, &rawPtr)) ) )
|
||||
rawPtr = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if ( mRawPtr )
|
||||
@ -50,5 +50,5 @@ nsCOMPtr_base::begin_assignment()
|
||||
if ( mRawPtr )
|
||||
NSCAP_RELEASE(mRawPtr);
|
||||
mRawPtr = 0;
|
||||
return NSCAP_REINTERPRET_CAST(void**, &mRawPtr);
|
||||
return NS_REINTERPRET_CAST(void**, &mRawPtr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -27,16 +27,31 @@
|
||||
// for |NS_PRECONDITION|
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef nscore_h___
|
||||
#include "nscore.h"
|
||||
// for |NS_REINTERPRET_CAST|
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef nsISupports_h___
|
||||
#include "nsISupports.h"
|
||||
// for |nsresult|, |NS_ADDREF|, et al
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
Having problems?
|
||||
|
||||
See the User Manual at:
|
||||
<http://www.meer.net/ScottCollins/doc/nsCOMPtr.html>, or
|
||||
<http://www.mozilla.org/projects/xpcom/nsCOMPtr.html>
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
TO DO...
|
||||
|
||||
+ make alternative function for |getter_AddRefs| (or something)
|
||||
+ make StartAssignment optionally inlined
|
||||
+ make constructor for |nsQueryInterface| explicit (suddenly construct/assign from raw pointer becomes illegal)
|
||||
+ Improve internal documentation
|
||||
+ mention *&
|
||||
@ -44,191 +59,6 @@
|
||||
+ do_QueryInterface
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/* USER MANUAL
|
||||
|
||||
See also:
|
||||
<http://www.meer.net/ScottCollins/doc/nsCOMPtr.html>, or
|
||||
<http://www.mozilla.org/projects/xpcom/nsCOMPtr.html>
|
||||
|
||||
What is |nsCOMPtr|?
|
||||
|
||||
|nsCOMPtr| is a `smart-pointer'. It is a template class that acts, syntactically,
|
||||
just like an ordinary pointer in C or C++, i.e., you can apply |*| or |->| to it to
|
||||
`get to' what it points at. |nsCOMPtr| is smart in that, unlike a raw COM
|
||||
interface pointer, |nsCOMPtr| manages |AddRef|, |Release|, and |QueryInterface|
|
||||
_for_ you.
|
||||
|
||||
For instance, here is a typical snippet of code (at its most compact) where you assign
|
||||
a COM interface pointer into a member variable:
|
||||
|
||||
NS_IF_RELEASE(mFoop); // If I have one already, I must release it before over-writing it.
|
||||
if ( mFooP = aPtr ) // Now it's safe to assign it in, and, if it's not NULL
|
||||
mFooP->AddRef(); // I must |AddRef| it, since I'll be holding on to it.
|
||||
|
||||
If our member variable |mFooP| were a |nsCOMPtr|, however, the snippet above
|
||||
would look like this:
|
||||
|
||||
mFoop = aPtr; // Note: automatically |Release|s the old and |AddRef|s the new
|
||||
|
||||
|nsCOMPtr| helps you write code that is leak-proof, exception safe, and significantly
|
||||
less verbose than you would with raw COM interface pointers. With |nsCOMPtr|, you
|
||||
may never have to call |AddRef|, |Release|, or |QueryInterface| by hand.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
You still have to understand COM. You still have to know which functions return
|
||||
interface pointers that have already been |AddRef|ed and which don't. You still
|
||||
have to ensure your program logic doesn't produce circularly referencing garbage.
|
||||
|nsCOMPtr| is not a panacea. It is, however, helpful, easy to use, well-tested,
|
||||
and polite. It doesn't require that a function author cooperate with you, nor does
|
||||
your use force others to use it.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Where should I use |nsCOMPtr|?
|
||||
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Where _shouldn't_ I use |nsCOMPtr|?
|
||||
|
||||
In public interfaces... [[others]]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
How does a |nsCOMPtr| differ from a raw pointer?
|
||||
|
||||
A |nsCOMPtr| differs, syntactically, from a raw COM interface pointer in three
|
||||
ways:
|
||||
|
||||
+ It's declared differently, e.g.,
|
||||
|
||||
// instead of saying // you say
|
||||
IFoo* fooP; nsCOMPtr<IFoo> fooP;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
+ You can't call |AddRef| or |Release| through it,
|
||||
|
||||
fooP->AddRef(); // OK fooP->AddRef(); // Error: no permission
|
||||
fooP->Release(); // OK fooP->Release(); // Error: no permission
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
+ You can't just apply an |&| to it to pass it to the typical `getter' function
|
||||
|
||||
AcquireFoo(&fooP); AcquireFoo( getter_AddRefs(fooP) );
|
||||
GetFoo(&fooP); GetFoo( getter_doesnt_AddRef(fooP) );
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
How do I use |nsCOMPtr|?
|
||||
|
||||
Typically, you can use a |nsCOMPtr| exactly as you would a standard COM
|
||||
interface pointer:
|
||||
|
||||
IFoo* fooP; nsCOMPtr<IFoo> fooP;
|
||||
// ... // ...
|
||||
fooP->SomeFunction(x, y, z); fooP->SomeFunction(x, y, z);
|
||||
AnotherFunction(fooP); AnotherFunction(fooP);
|
||||
|
||||
if ( fooP ) if ( fooP )
|
||||
// ... // ...
|
||||
|
||||
if ( fooP == barP ) if ( fooP == barP )
|
||||
// ... // ...
|
||||
|
||||
There are some differences, though. In particular, you can't call |AddRef| or |Release|
|
||||
through a |nsCOMPtr| directly, nor would you need to. |AddRef| is called for you
|
||||
whenever you assign a COM interface pointer _into_ a |nsCOMPtr|. |Release| is
|
||||
called on the old value, and also when the |nsCOMPtr| goes out of scope. Trying
|
||||
to call |AddRef| or |Release| yourself will generate a compile-time error.
|
||||
|
||||
fooP->AddRef(); // fooP->AddRef(); // ERROR: no permission
|
||||
fooP->Release(); // fooP->Release(); // ERROR: no permission
|
||||
|
||||
The final difference is that a bare |nsCOMPtr| (or rather a pointer to it) can't
|
||||
be supplied as an argument to a function that `fills in' a COM interface pointer.
|
||||
Rather it must be wrapped with a utility call that says whether the function calls
|
||||
|AddRef| before returning, e.g.,
|
||||
|
||||
...->QueryInterface(riid, &fooP) ...->QueryInterface(riid, getter_AddRefs(fooP))
|
||||
|
||||
LookupFoo(&fooP); LookupFoo( getter_doesnt_AddRef(fooP) );
|
||||
|
||||
Don't worry. It's a compile-time error if you forget to wrap it.
|
||||
|
||||
Compare the raw-pointer way...
|
||||
|
||||
IFoo* foo = 0;
|
||||
nsresult status = CreateIFoo(&foo);
|
||||
if ( NS_SUCCEEDED(status) )
|
||||
{
|
||||
IBar* bar = 0;
|
||||
if ( NS_SUCCEEDED(status = foo->QueryInterface(riid, &bar)) )
|
||||
{
|
||||
IFooBar* foobar = 0;
|
||||
if ( NS_SUCCEEDED(status = CreateIFooBar(foo, bar, &foobar)) )
|
||||
{
|
||||
foobar->DoTheReallyHardThing();
|
||||
foobar->Release();
|
||||
}
|
||||
bar->Release();
|
||||
}
|
||||
foo->Release();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
To the smart-pointer way...
|
||||
|
||||
nsCOMPtr<IFoo> fooP;
|
||||
nsresult status = CreateIFoo( getter_AddRefs(fooP) );
|
||||
if ( NS_SUCCEEDED(status) )
|
||||
if ( nsCOMPtr<IBar> barP( fooP ) )
|
||||
{
|
||||
nsCOMPtr<IFooBar> fooBarP;
|
||||
if ( NS_SUCCEEDED(status = CreateIFooBar(fooP, barP, getter_AddRefs(fooBarP))) )
|
||||
fooBarP->DoTheReallyHardThing();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Is there an easy way to convert my current code?
|
||||
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
What do I have to beware of?
|
||||
|
||||
VC++ < 6.0 _can't_ handle the following situation
|
||||
|
||||
class nsIFoo; // forward declare some class
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
nsCOMPtr<nsIFoo> bar; // ERROR: incomplete type nsIFoo, etc.
|
||||
|
||||
Instead, you must make sure that you actually defined the underlying interface class, e.g.,
|
||||
|
||||
#include "nsIFoo.h" // fully defines |class nsIFoo|
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
nsCOMPtr<nsIFoo> bar; // no problem
|
||||
|
||||
Why is this? It's because VC++ tries to instantiate every member of the template
|
||||
as soon as it sees the template declarations. Bad compiler. No cookie!
|
||||
[[Thanks to mjudge, waterson, and pinkerton on this one.]]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Why does |getter_AddRefs| have such a funny name? I.e., why doesn't it follow our
|
||||
naming conventions?
|
||||
|
||||
|getter_AddRefs| and |getter_doesnt_AddRef| use underscores for the same
|
||||
reason our special macros do, quoting from our coding conventions "...to make them
|
||||
stick out like a sore thumb". Note also that since |AddRef| is one word,
|
||||
|getter_AddRefs| and |getter_doesnt_AddRef| couldn't have the right spacing if only inter-
|
||||
caps were used.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
WARNING:
|
||||
This file defines several macros for internal use only. These macros begin with the
|
||||
@ -239,85 +69,44 @@
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
Set up some |#define|s to turn off a couple of troublesome C++ features.
|
||||
Interestingly, none of the compilers barf on template stuff.
|
||||
|
||||
Ideally, we would want declarations like these in a configuration file
|
||||
that everybody would get. Deciding exactly how to do that should
|
||||
be part of the process of moving from experimental to production.
|
||||
|
||||
Update: ramiro is working on getting these into the configuration system.
|
||||
Interestingly, none of the compilers barf on template stuff. These are set up automatically
|
||||
by the autoconf system for all Unixes. (Temporarily, I hope) I have to define them
|
||||
myself for Mac and Windows.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef HAVE_CPP_EXPLICIT
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_EXPLICIT
|
||||
// under Metrowerks (Mac), we don't have autoconf yet
|
||||
#ifdef __MWERKS__
|
||||
#define HAVE_CPP_USING
|
||||
#define HAVE_CPP_EXPLICIT
|
||||
#define HAVE_CPP_NEW_CASTS
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef HAVE_CPP_USING
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_MEMBER_USING_DECLARATIONS
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
// under VC++ (Windows), we don't have autoconf yet
|
||||
#ifdef _MSC_VER
|
||||
#define HAVE_CPP_EXPLICIT
|
||||
#define HAVE_CPP_USING
|
||||
#define HAVE_CPP_NEW_CASTS
|
||||
|
||||
/* HAVE_CPP_NEW_CASTS test is not strict enough yet. scc? */
|
||||
#if 0
|
||||
#ifndef HAVE_CPP_NEW_CASTS
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_NEW_CASTS
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef NEED_CPP_UNUSED_IMPLEMENTATIONS
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NEED_UNUSED_VIRTUAL_IMPLEMENTATIONS
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(__GNUG__) && (__GNUC_MINOR__ <= 90) && !defined(SOLARIS)
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_MEMBER_USING_DECLARATIONS
|
||||
|
||||
#if (defined(LINUX) || defined(__bsdi__)) && (__GNUC_MINOR__ <= 7)
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NEED_UNUSED_VIRTUAL_IMPLEMENTATIONS
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(SOLARIS) && !defined(__GNUG__)
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_EXPLICIT
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_NEW_CASTS
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_MEMBER_USING_DECLARATIONS
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(_MSC_VER)
|
||||
#if (_MSC_VER<1100)
|
||||
// before 5.0, VC++ couldn't handle explicit
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_EXPLICIT
|
||||
#undef HAVE_CPP_EXPLICIT
|
||||
#elif (_MSC_VER==1100)
|
||||
// VC++5.0 has an internal compiler error (sometimes) without this
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_MEMBER_USING_DECLARATIONS
|
||||
#undef HAVE_CPP_USING
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(IRIX) || defined(AIX)
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_MEMBER_USING_DECLARATIONS
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_EXPLICIT
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_NEW_CASTS
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(HPUX)
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_MEMBER_USING_DECLARATIONS
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_NEW_CASTS
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
/*
|
||||
If the compiler doesn't support |explicit|, we'll just make it go away, trusting
|
||||
that the builds under compilers that do have it will keep us on the straight and narrow.
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(AIX)
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_EXPLICIT
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_NEW_CASTS
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_MEMBER_USING_DECLARATIONS
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef NSCAP_NO_EXPLICIT
|
||||
This should probably be moved to "nscore.h".
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#ifndef HAVE_CPP_EXPLICIT
|
||||
#define explicit
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef NSCAP_NO_NEW_CASTS
|
||||
#define NSCAP_REINTERPRET_CAST(T,x) reinterpret_cast<T>(x)
|
||||
#else
|
||||
#define NSCAP_REINTERPRET_CAST(T,x) ((T)(x))
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef NSCAP_FEATURE_DEBUG_MACROS
|
||||
#define NSCAP_ADDREF(ptr) NS_ADDREF(ptr)
|
||||
#define NSCAP_RELEASE(ptr) NS_RELEASE(ptr)
|
||||
@ -351,7 +140,7 @@ class nsDerivedSafe : public T
|
||||
*/
|
||||
{
|
||||
private:
|
||||
#ifndef NSCAP_NO_MEMBER_USING_DECLARATIONS
|
||||
#ifdef HAVE_CPP_USING
|
||||
using T::AddRef;
|
||||
using T::Release;
|
||||
#else
|
||||
@ -359,14 +148,14 @@ class nsDerivedSafe : public T
|
||||
NS_IMETHOD_(nsrefcnt) Release(void);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
void operator delete( void* ); // NOT TO BE IMPLEMENTED
|
||||
void operator delete( void*, size_t ); // NOT TO BE IMPLEMENTED
|
||||
// declaring |operator delete| private makes calling delete on an interface pointer a compile error
|
||||
|
||||
nsDerivedSafe<T>& operator=( const nsDerivedSafe<T>& ); // NOT TO BE IMPLEMENTED
|
||||
// you may not call |operator=()| through a dereferenced |nsCOMPtr|, because you'd get the wrong one
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(NSCAP_NO_MEMBER_USING_DECLARATIONS) && defined(NSCAP_NEED_UNUSED_VIRTUAL_IMPLEMENTATIONS)
|
||||
#if !defined(HAVE_CPP_USING) && defined(NEED_CPP_UNUSED_IMPLEMENTATIONS)
|
||||
template <class T>
|
||||
nsrefcnt
|
||||
nsDerivedSafe<T>::AddRef()
|
||||
@ -415,7 +204,7 @@ dont_QueryInterface( T* aRawPtr )
|
||||
|
||||
struct nsQueryInterface
|
||||
{
|
||||
// explicit
|
||||
explicit
|
||||
nsQueryInterface( nsISupports* aRawPtr, nsresult* error = 0 )
|
||||
: mRawPtr(aRawPtr),
|
||||
mErrorPtr(error)
|
||||
@ -507,7 +296,6 @@ class nsCOMPtr_base
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
template <class T>
|
||||
class nsCOMPtr : private nsCOMPtr_base
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -583,7 +371,7 @@ class nsCOMPtr : private nsCOMPtr_base
|
||||
get() const
|
||||
// returns a |nsDerivedSafe<T>*| to deny clients the use of |AddRef| and |Release|
|
||||
{
|
||||
return NSCAP_REINTERPRET_CAST(nsDerivedSafe<T>*, mRawPtr);
|
||||
return NS_REINTERPRET_CAST(nsDerivedSafe<T>*, mRawPtr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
nsDerivedSafe<T>*
|
||||
@ -625,7 +413,7 @@ class nsCOMPtr : private nsCOMPtr_base
|
||||
T**
|
||||
StartAssignment()
|
||||
{
|
||||
return NSCAP_REINTERPRET_CAST(T**, begin_assignment());
|
||||
return NS_REINTERPRET_CAST(T**, begin_assignment());
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
@ -658,7 +446,7 @@ class nsGetterAddRefs
|
||||
operator void**()
|
||||
{
|
||||
// NS_PRECONDITION(mTargetSmartPtr != 0, "getter_AddRefs into no destination");
|
||||
return NSCAP_REINTERPRET_CAST(void**, mTargetSmartPtr.StartAssignment());
|
||||
return NS_REINTERPRET_CAST(void**, mTargetSmartPtr.StartAssignment());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
T*&
|
||||
|
@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ void
|
||||
nsCOMPtr_base::assign_with_QueryInterface( nsISupports* rawPtr, const nsIID& iid, nsresult* result )
|
||||
{
|
||||
nsresult status = NS_OK;
|
||||
if ( !rawPtr || !NS_SUCCEEDED( status = rawPtr->QueryInterface(iid, NSCAP_REINTERPRET_CAST(void**, &rawPtr)) ) )
|
||||
if ( !rawPtr || !NS_SUCCEEDED( status = rawPtr->QueryInterface(iid, NS_REINTERPRET_CAST(void**, &rawPtr)) ) )
|
||||
rawPtr = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if ( mRawPtr )
|
||||
@ -50,5 +50,5 @@ nsCOMPtr_base::begin_assignment()
|
||||
if ( mRawPtr )
|
||||
NSCAP_RELEASE(mRawPtr);
|
||||
mRawPtr = 0;
|
||||
return NSCAP_REINTERPRET_CAST(void**, &mRawPtr);
|
||||
return NS_REINTERPRET_CAST(void**, &mRawPtr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -27,16 +27,31 @@
|
||||
// for |NS_PRECONDITION|
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef nscore_h___
|
||||
#include "nscore.h"
|
||||
// for |NS_REINTERPRET_CAST|
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef nsISupports_h___
|
||||
#include "nsISupports.h"
|
||||
// for |nsresult|, |NS_ADDREF|, et al
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
Having problems?
|
||||
|
||||
See the User Manual at:
|
||||
<http://www.meer.net/ScottCollins/doc/nsCOMPtr.html>, or
|
||||
<http://www.mozilla.org/projects/xpcom/nsCOMPtr.html>
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
TO DO...
|
||||
|
||||
+ make alternative function for |getter_AddRefs| (or something)
|
||||
+ make StartAssignment optionally inlined
|
||||
+ make constructor for |nsQueryInterface| explicit (suddenly construct/assign from raw pointer becomes illegal)
|
||||
+ Improve internal documentation
|
||||
+ mention *&
|
||||
@ -44,191 +59,6 @@
|
||||
+ do_QueryInterface
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/* USER MANUAL
|
||||
|
||||
See also:
|
||||
<http://www.meer.net/ScottCollins/doc/nsCOMPtr.html>, or
|
||||
<http://www.mozilla.org/projects/xpcom/nsCOMPtr.html>
|
||||
|
||||
What is |nsCOMPtr|?
|
||||
|
||||
|nsCOMPtr| is a `smart-pointer'. It is a template class that acts, syntactically,
|
||||
just like an ordinary pointer in C or C++, i.e., you can apply |*| or |->| to it to
|
||||
`get to' what it points at. |nsCOMPtr| is smart in that, unlike a raw COM
|
||||
interface pointer, |nsCOMPtr| manages |AddRef|, |Release|, and |QueryInterface|
|
||||
_for_ you.
|
||||
|
||||
For instance, here is a typical snippet of code (at its most compact) where you assign
|
||||
a COM interface pointer into a member variable:
|
||||
|
||||
NS_IF_RELEASE(mFoop); // If I have one already, I must release it before over-writing it.
|
||||
if ( mFooP = aPtr ) // Now it's safe to assign it in, and, if it's not NULL
|
||||
mFooP->AddRef(); // I must |AddRef| it, since I'll be holding on to it.
|
||||
|
||||
If our member variable |mFooP| were a |nsCOMPtr|, however, the snippet above
|
||||
would look like this:
|
||||
|
||||
mFoop = aPtr; // Note: automatically |Release|s the old and |AddRef|s the new
|
||||
|
||||
|nsCOMPtr| helps you write code that is leak-proof, exception safe, and significantly
|
||||
less verbose than you would with raw COM interface pointers. With |nsCOMPtr|, you
|
||||
may never have to call |AddRef|, |Release|, or |QueryInterface| by hand.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
You still have to understand COM. You still have to know which functions return
|
||||
interface pointers that have already been |AddRef|ed and which don't. You still
|
||||
have to ensure your program logic doesn't produce circularly referencing garbage.
|
||||
|nsCOMPtr| is not a panacea. It is, however, helpful, easy to use, well-tested,
|
||||
and polite. It doesn't require that a function author cooperate with you, nor does
|
||||
your use force others to use it.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Where should I use |nsCOMPtr|?
|
||||
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Where _shouldn't_ I use |nsCOMPtr|?
|
||||
|
||||
In public interfaces... [[others]]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
How does a |nsCOMPtr| differ from a raw pointer?
|
||||
|
||||
A |nsCOMPtr| differs, syntactically, from a raw COM interface pointer in three
|
||||
ways:
|
||||
|
||||
+ It's declared differently, e.g.,
|
||||
|
||||
// instead of saying // you say
|
||||
IFoo* fooP; nsCOMPtr<IFoo> fooP;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
+ You can't call |AddRef| or |Release| through it,
|
||||
|
||||
fooP->AddRef(); // OK fooP->AddRef(); // Error: no permission
|
||||
fooP->Release(); // OK fooP->Release(); // Error: no permission
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
+ You can't just apply an |&| to it to pass it to the typical `getter' function
|
||||
|
||||
AcquireFoo(&fooP); AcquireFoo( getter_AddRefs(fooP) );
|
||||
GetFoo(&fooP); GetFoo( getter_doesnt_AddRef(fooP) );
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
How do I use |nsCOMPtr|?
|
||||
|
||||
Typically, you can use a |nsCOMPtr| exactly as you would a standard COM
|
||||
interface pointer:
|
||||
|
||||
IFoo* fooP; nsCOMPtr<IFoo> fooP;
|
||||
// ... // ...
|
||||
fooP->SomeFunction(x, y, z); fooP->SomeFunction(x, y, z);
|
||||
AnotherFunction(fooP); AnotherFunction(fooP);
|
||||
|
||||
if ( fooP ) if ( fooP )
|
||||
// ... // ...
|
||||
|
||||
if ( fooP == barP ) if ( fooP == barP )
|
||||
// ... // ...
|
||||
|
||||
There are some differences, though. In particular, you can't call |AddRef| or |Release|
|
||||
through a |nsCOMPtr| directly, nor would you need to. |AddRef| is called for you
|
||||
whenever you assign a COM interface pointer _into_ a |nsCOMPtr|. |Release| is
|
||||
called on the old value, and also when the |nsCOMPtr| goes out of scope. Trying
|
||||
to call |AddRef| or |Release| yourself will generate a compile-time error.
|
||||
|
||||
fooP->AddRef(); // fooP->AddRef(); // ERROR: no permission
|
||||
fooP->Release(); // fooP->Release(); // ERROR: no permission
|
||||
|
||||
The final difference is that a bare |nsCOMPtr| (or rather a pointer to it) can't
|
||||
be supplied as an argument to a function that `fills in' a COM interface pointer.
|
||||
Rather it must be wrapped with a utility call that says whether the function calls
|
||||
|AddRef| before returning, e.g.,
|
||||
|
||||
...->QueryInterface(riid, &fooP) ...->QueryInterface(riid, getter_AddRefs(fooP))
|
||||
|
||||
LookupFoo(&fooP); LookupFoo( getter_doesnt_AddRef(fooP) );
|
||||
|
||||
Don't worry. It's a compile-time error if you forget to wrap it.
|
||||
|
||||
Compare the raw-pointer way...
|
||||
|
||||
IFoo* foo = 0;
|
||||
nsresult status = CreateIFoo(&foo);
|
||||
if ( NS_SUCCEEDED(status) )
|
||||
{
|
||||
IBar* bar = 0;
|
||||
if ( NS_SUCCEEDED(status = foo->QueryInterface(riid, &bar)) )
|
||||
{
|
||||
IFooBar* foobar = 0;
|
||||
if ( NS_SUCCEEDED(status = CreateIFooBar(foo, bar, &foobar)) )
|
||||
{
|
||||
foobar->DoTheReallyHardThing();
|
||||
foobar->Release();
|
||||
}
|
||||
bar->Release();
|
||||
}
|
||||
foo->Release();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
To the smart-pointer way...
|
||||
|
||||
nsCOMPtr<IFoo> fooP;
|
||||
nsresult status = CreateIFoo( getter_AddRefs(fooP) );
|
||||
if ( NS_SUCCEEDED(status) )
|
||||
if ( nsCOMPtr<IBar> barP( fooP ) )
|
||||
{
|
||||
nsCOMPtr<IFooBar> fooBarP;
|
||||
if ( NS_SUCCEEDED(status = CreateIFooBar(fooP, barP, getter_AddRefs(fooBarP))) )
|
||||
fooBarP->DoTheReallyHardThing();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Is there an easy way to convert my current code?
|
||||
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
What do I have to beware of?
|
||||
|
||||
VC++ < 6.0 _can't_ handle the following situation
|
||||
|
||||
class nsIFoo; // forward declare some class
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
nsCOMPtr<nsIFoo> bar; // ERROR: incomplete type nsIFoo, etc.
|
||||
|
||||
Instead, you must make sure that you actually defined the underlying interface class, e.g.,
|
||||
|
||||
#include "nsIFoo.h" // fully defines |class nsIFoo|
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
nsCOMPtr<nsIFoo> bar; // no problem
|
||||
|
||||
Why is this? It's because VC++ tries to instantiate every member of the template
|
||||
as soon as it sees the template declarations. Bad compiler. No cookie!
|
||||
[[Thanks to mjudge, waterson, and pinkerton on this one.]]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Why does |getter_AddRefs| have such a funny name? I.e., why doesn't it follow our
|
||||
naming conventions?
|
||||
|
||||
|getter_AddRefs| and |getter_doesnt_AddRef| use underscores for the same
|
||||
reason our special macros do, quoting from our coding conventions "...to make them
|
||||
stick out like a sore thumb". Note also that since |AddRef| is one word,
|
||||
|getter_AddRefs| and |getter_doesnt_AddRef| couldn't have the right spacing if only inter-
|
||||
caps were used.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
WARNING:
|
||||
This file defines several macros for internal use only. These macros begin with the
|
||||
@ -239,85 +69,44 @@
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
Set up some |#define|s to turn off a couple of troublesome C++ features.
|
||||
Interestingly, none of the compilers barf on template stuff.
|
||||
|
||||
Ideally, we would want declarations like these in a configuration file
|
||||
that everybody would get. Deciding exactly how to do that should
|
||||
be part of the process of moving from experimental to production.
|
||||
|
||||
Update: ramiro is working on getting these into the configuration system.
|
||||
Interestingly, none of the compilers barf on template stuff. These are set up automatically
|
||||
by the autoconf system for all Unixes. (Temporarily, I hope) I have to define them
|
||||
myself for Mac and Windows.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef HAVE_CPP_EXPLICIT
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_EXPLICIT
|
||||
// under Metrowerks (Mac), we don't have autoconf yet
|
||||
#ifdef __MWERKS__
|
||||
#define HAVE_CPP_USING
|
||||
#define HAVE_CPP_EXPLICIT
|
||||
#define HAVE_CPP_NEW_CASTS
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef HAVE_CPP_USING
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_MEMBER_USING_DECLARATIONS
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
// under VC++ (Windows), we don't have autoconf yet
|
||||
#ifdef _MSC_VER
|
||||
#define HAVE_CPP_EXPLICIT
|
||||
#define HAVE_CPP_USING
|
||||
#define HAVE_CPP_NEW_CASTS
|
||||
|
||||
/* HAVE_CPP_NEW_CASTS test is not strict enough yet. scc? */
|
||||
#if 0
|
||||
#ifndef HAVE_CPP_NEW_CASTS
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_NEW_CASTS
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef NEED_CPP_UNUSED_IMPLEMENTATIONS
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NEED_UNUSED_VIRTUAL_IMPLEMENTATIONS
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(__GNUG__) && (__GNUC_MINOR__ <= 90) && !defined(SOLARIS)
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_MEMBER_USING_DECLARATIONS
|
||||
|
||||
#if (defined(LINUX) || defined(__bsdi__)) && (__GNUC_MINOR__ <= 7)
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NEED_UNUSED_VIRTUAL_IMPLEMENTATIONS
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(SOLARIS) && !defined(__GNUG__)
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_EXPLICIT
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_NEW_CASTS
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_MEMBER_USING_DECLARATIONS
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(_MSC_VER)
|
||||
#if (_MSC_VER<1100)
|
||||
// before 5.0, VC++ couldn't handle explicit
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_EXPLICIT
|
||||
#undef HAVE_CPP_EXPLICIT
|
||||
#elif (_MSC_VER==1100)
|
||||
// VC++5.0 has an internal compiler error (sometimes) without this
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_MEMBER_USING_DECLARATIONS
|
||||
#undef HAVE_CPP_USING
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(IRIX) || defined(AIX)
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_MEMBER_USING_DECLARATIONS
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_EXPLICIT
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_NEW_CASTS
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(HPUX)
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_MEMBER_USING_DECLARATIONS
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_NEW_CASTS
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
/*
|
||||
If the compiler doesn't support |explicit|, we'll just make it go away, trusting
|
||||
that the builds under compilers that do have it will keep us on the straight and narrow.
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(AIX)
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_EXPLICIT
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_NEW_CASTS
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_MEMBER_USING_DECLARATIONS
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef NSCAP_NO_EXPLICIT
|
||||
This should probably be moved to "nscore.h".
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#ifndef HAVE_CPP_EXPLICIT
|
||||
#define explicit
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef NSCAP_NO_NEW_CASTS
|
||||
#define NSCAP_REINTERPRET_CAST(T,x) reinterpret_cast<T>(x)
|
||||
#else
|
||||
#define NSCAP_REINTERPRET_CAST(T,x) ((T)(x))
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef NSCAP_FEATURE_DEBUG_MACROS
|
||||
#define NSCAP_ADDREF(ptr) NS_ADDREF(ptr)
|
||||
#define NSCAP_RELEASE(ptr) NS_RELEASE(ptr)
|
||||
@ -351,7 +140,7 @@ class nsDerivedSafe : public T
|
||||
*/
|
||||
{
|
||||
private:
|
||||
#ifndef NSCAP_NO_MEMBER_USING_DECLARATIONS
|
||||
#ifdef HAVE_CPP_USING
|
||||
using T::AddRef;
|
||||
using T::Release;
|
||||
#else
|
||||
@ -359,14 +148,14 @@ class nsDerivedSafe : public T
|
||||
NS_IMETHOD_(nsrefcnt) Release(void);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
void operator delete( void* ); // NOT TO BE IMPLEMENTED
|
||||
void operator delete( void*, size_t ); // NOT TO BE IMPLEMENTED
|
||||
// declaring |operator delete| private makes calling delete on an interface pointer a compile error
|
||||
|
||||
nsDerivedSafe<T>& operator=( const nsDerivedSafe<T>& ); // NOT TO BE IMPLEMENTED
|
||||
// you may not call |operator=()| through a dereferenced |nsCOMPtr|, because you'd get the wrong one
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(NSCAP_NO_MEMBER_USING_DECLARATIONS) && defined(NSCAP_NEED_UNUSED_VIRTUAL_IMPLEMENTATIONS)
|
||||
#if !defined(HAVE_CPP_USING) && defined(NEED_CPP_UNUSED_IMPLEMENTATIONS)
|
||||
template <class T>
|
||||
nsrefcnt
|
||||
nsDerivedSafe<T>::AddRef()
|
||||
@ -415,7 +204,7 @@ dont_QueryInterface( T* aRawPtr )
|
||||
|
||||
struct nsQueryInterface
|
||||
{
|
||||
// explicit
|
||||
explicit
|
||||
nsQueryInterface( nsISupports* aRawPtr, nsresult* error = 0 )
|
||||
: mRawPtr(aRawPtr),
|
||||
mErrorPtr(error)
|
||||
@ -507,7 +296,6 @@ class nsCOMPtr_base
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
template <class T>
|
||||
class nsCOMPtr : private nsCOMPtr_base
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -583,7 +371,7 @@ class nsCOMPtr : private nsCOMPtr_base
|
||||
get() const
|
||||
// returns a |nsDerivedSafe<T>*| to deny clients the use of |AddRef| and |Release|
|
||||
{
|
||||
return NSCAP_REINTERPRET_CAST(nsDerivedSafe<T>*, mRawPtr);
|
||||
return NS_REINTERPRET_CAST(nsDerivedSafe<T>*, mRawPtr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
nsDerivedSafe<T>*
|
||||
@ -625,7 +413,7 @@ class nsCOMPtr : private nsCOMPtr_base
|
||||
T**
|
||||
StartAssignment()
|
||||
{
|
||||
return NSCAP_REINTERPRET_CAST(T**, begin_assignment());
|
||||
return NS_REINTERPRET_CAST(T**, begin_assignment());
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
@ -658,7 +446,7 @@ class nsGetterAddRefs
|
||||
operator void**()
|
||||
{
|
||||
// NS_PRECONDITION(mTargetSmartPtr != 0, "getter_AddRefs into no destination");
|
||||
return NSCAP_REINTERPRET_CAST(void**, mTargetSmartPtr.StartAssignment());
|
||||
return NS_REINTERPRET_CAST(void**, mTargetSmartPtr.StartAssignment());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
T*&
|
||||
|
@ -27,16 +27,31 @@
|
||||
// for |NS_PRECONDITION|
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef nscore_h___
|
||||
#include "nscore.h"
|
||||
// for |NS_REINTERPRET_CAST|
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef nsISupports_h___
|
||||
#include "nsISupports.h"
|
||||
// for |nsresult|, |NS_ADDREF|, et al
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
Having problems?
|
||||
|
||||
See the User Manual at:
|
||||
<http://www.meer.net/ScottCollins/doc/nsCOMPtr.html>, or
|
||||
<http://www.mozilla.org/projects/xpcom/nsCOMPtr.html>
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
TO DO...
|
||||
|
||||
+ make alternative function for |getter_AddRefs| (or something)
|
||||
+ make StartAssignment optionally inlined
|
||||
+ make constructor for |nsQueryInterface| explicit (suddenly construct/assign from raw pointer becomes illegal)
|
||||
+ Improve internal documentation
|
||||
+ mention *&
|
||||
@ -44,191 +59,6 @@
|
||||
+ do_QueryInterface
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/* USER MANUAL
|
||||
|
||||
See also:
|
||||
<http://www.meer.net/ScottCollins/doc/nsCOMPtr.html>, or
|
||||
<http://www.mozilla.org/projects/xpcom/nsCOMPtr.html>
|
||||
|
||||
What is |nsCOMPtr|?
|
||||
|
||||
|nsCOMPtr| is a `smart-pointer'. It is a template class that acts, syntactically,
|
||||
just like an ordinary pointer in C or C++, i.e., you can apply |*| or |->| to it to
|
||||
`get to' what it points at. |nsCOMPtr| is smart in that, unlike a raw COM
|
||||
interface pointer, |nsCOMPtr| manages |AddRef|, |Release|, and |QueryInterface|
|
||||
_for_ you.
|
||||
|
||||
For instance, here is a typical snippet of code (at its most compact) where you assign
|
||||
a COM interface pointer into a member variable:
|
||||
|
||||
NS_IF_RELEASE(mFoop); // If I have one already, I must release it before over-writing it.
|
||||
if ( mFooP = aPtr ) // Now it's safe to assign it in, and, if it's not NULL
|
||||
mFooP->AddRef(); // I must |AddRef| it, since I'll be holding on to it.
|
||||
|
||||
If our member variable |mFooP| were a |nsCOMPtr|, however, the snippet above
|
||||
would look like this:
|
||||
|
||||
mFoop = aPtr; // Note: automatically |Release|s the old and |AddRef|s the new
|
||||
|
||||
|nsCOMPtr| helps you write code that is leak-proof, exception safe, and significantly
|
||||
less verbose than you would with raw COM interface pointers. With |nsCOMPtr|, you
|
||||
may never have to call |AddRef|, |Release|, or |QueryInterface| by hand.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
You still have to understand COM. You still have to know which functions return
|
||||
interface pointers that have already been |AddRef|ed and which don't. You still
|
||||
have to ensure your program logic doesn't produce circularly referencing garbage.
|
||||
|nsCOMPtr| is not a panacea. It is, however, helpful, easy to use, well-tested,
|
||||
and polite. It doesn't require that a function author cooperate with you, nor does
|
||||
your use force others to use it.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Where should I use |nsCOMPtr|?
|
||||
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Where _shouldn't_ I use |nsCOMPtr|?
|
||||
|
||||
In public interfaces... [[others]]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
How does a |nsCOMPtr| differ from a raw pointer?
|
||||
|
||||
A |nsCOMPtr| differs, syntactically, from a raw COM interface pointer in three
|
||||
ways:
|
||||
|
||||
+ It's declared differently, e.g.,
|
||||
|
||||
// instead of saying // you say
|
||||
IFoo* fooP; nsCOMPtr<IFoo> fooP;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
+ You can't call |AddRef| or |Release| through it,
|
||||
|
||||
fooP->AddRef(); // OK fooP->AddRef(); // Error: no permission
|
||||
fooP->Release(); // OK fooP->Release(); // Error: no permission
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
+ You can't just apply an |&| to it to pass it to the typical `getter' function
|
||||
|
||||
AcquireFoo(&fooP); AcquireFoo( getter_AddRefs(fooP) );
|
||||
GetFoo(&fooP); GetFoo( getter_doesnt_AddRef(fooP) );
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
How do I use |nsCOMPtr|?
|
||||
|
||||
Typically, you can use a |nsCOMPtr| exactly as you would a standard COM
|
||||
interface pointer:
|
||||
|
||||
IFoo* fooP; nsCOMPtr<IFoo> fooP;
|
||||
// ... // ...
|
||||
fooP->SomeFunction(x, y, z); fooP->SomeFunction(x, y, z);
|
||||
AnotherFunction(fooP); AnotherFunction(fooP);
|
||||
|
||||
if ( fooP ) if ( fooP )
|
||||
// ... // ...
|
||||
|
||||
if ( fooP == barP ) if ( fooP == barP )
|
||||
// ... // ...
|
||||
|
||||
There are some differences, though. In particular, you can't call |AddRef| or |Release|
|
||||
through a |nsCOMPtr| directly, nor would you need to. |AddRef| is called for you
|
||||
whenever you assign a COM interface pointer _into_ a |nsCOMPtr|. |Release| is
|
||||
called on the old value, and also when the |nsCOMPtr| goes out of scope. Trying
|
||||
to call |AddRef| or |Release| yourself will generate a compile-time error.
|
||||
|
||||
fooP->AddRef(); // fooP->AddRef(); // ERROR: no permission
|
||||
fooP->Release(); // fooP->Release(); // ERROR: no permission
|
||||
|
||||
The final difference is that a bare |nsCOMPtr| (or rather a pointer to it) can't
|
||||
be supplied as an argument to a function that `fills in' a COM interface pointer.
|
||||
Rather it must be wrapped with a utility call that says whether the function calls
|
||||
|AddRef| before returning, e.g.,
|
||||
|
||||
...->QueryInterface(riid, &fooP) ...->QueryInterface(riid, getter_AddRefs(fooP))
|
||||
|
||||
LookupFoo(&fooP); LookupFoo( getter_doesnt_AddRef(fooP) );
|
||||
|
||||
Don't worry. It's a compile-time error if you forget to wrap it.
|
||||
|
||||
Compare the raw-pointer way...
|
||||
|
||||
IFoo* foo = 0;
|
||||
nsresult status = CreateIFoo(&foo);
|
||||
if ( NS_SUCCEEDED(status) )
|
||||
{
|
||||
IBar* bar = 0;
|
||||
if ( NS_SUCCEEDED(status = foo->QueryInterface(riid, &bar)) )
|
||||
{
|
||||
IFooBar* foobar = 0;
|
||||
if ( NS_SUCCEEDED(status = CreateIFooBar(foo, bar, &foobar)) )
|
||||
{
|
||||
foobar->DoTheReallyHardThing();
|
||||
foobar->Release();
|
||||
}
|
||||
bar->Release();
|
||||
}
|
||||
foo->Release();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
To the smart-pointer way...
|
||||
|
||||
nsCOMPtr<IFoo> fooP;
|
||||
nsresult status = CreateIFoo( getter_AddRefs(fooP) );
|
||||
if ( NS_SUCCEEDED(status) )
|
||||
if ( nsCOMPtr<IBar> barP( fooP ) )
|
||||
{
|
||||
nsCOMPtr<IFooBar> fooBarP;
|
||||
if ( NS_SUCCEEDED(status = CreateIFooBar(fooP, barP, getter_AddRefs(fooBarP))) )
|
||||
fooBarP->DoTheReallyHardThing();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Is there an easy way to convert my current code?
|
||||
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
What do I have to beware of?
|
||||
|
||||
VC++ < 6.0 _can't_ handle the following situation
|
||||
|
||||
class nsIFoo; // forward declare some class
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
nsCOMPtr<nsIFoo> bar; // ERROR: incomplete type nsIFoo, etc.
|
||||
|
||||
Instead, you must make sure that you actually defined the underlying interface class, e.g.,
|
||||
|
||||
#include "nsIFoo.h" // fully defines |class nsIFoo|
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
nsCOMPtr<nsIFoo> bar; // no problem
|
||||
|
||||
Why is this? It's because VC++ tries to instantiate every member of the template
|
||||
as soon as it sees the template declarations. Bad compiler. No cookie!
|
||||
[[Thanks to mjudge, waterson, and pinkerton on this one.]]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Why does |getter_AddRefs| have such a funny name? I.e., why doesn't it follow our
|
||||
naming conventions?
|
||||
|
||||
|getter_AddRefs| and |getter_doesnt_AddRef| use underscores for the same
|
||||
reason our special macros do, quoting from our coding conventions "...to make them
|
||||
stick out like a sore thumb". Note also that since |AddRef| is one word,
|
||||
|getter_AddRefs| and |getter_doesnt_AddRef| couldn't have the right spacing if only inter-
|
||||
caps were used.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
WARNING:
|
||||
This file defines several macros for internal use only. These macros begin with the
|
||||
@ -239,85 +69,44 @@
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
Set up some |#define|s to turn off a couple of troublesome C++ features.
|
||||
Interestingly, none of the compilers barf on template stuff.
|
||||
|
||||
Ideally, we would want declarations like these in a configuration file
|
||||
that everybody would get. Deciding exactly how to do that should
|
||||
be part of the process of moving from experimental to production.
|
||||
|
||||
Update: ramiro is working on getting these into the configuration system.
|
||||
Interestingly, none of the compilers barf on template stuff. These are set up automatically
|
||||
by the autoconf system for all Unixes. (Temporarily, I hope) I have to define them
|
||||
myself for Mac and Windows.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef HAVE_CPP_EXPLICIT
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_EXPLICIT
|
||||
// under Metrowerks (Mac), we don't have autoconf yet
|
||||
#ifdef __MWERKS__
|
||||
#define HAVE_CPP_USING
|
||||
#define HAVE_CPP_EXPLICIT
|
||||
#define HAVE_CPP_NEW_CASTS
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef HAVE_CPP_USING
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_MEMBER_USING_DECLARATIONS
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
// under VC++ (Windows), we don't have autoconf yet
|
||||
#ifdef _MSC_VER
|
||||
#define HAVE_CPP_EXPLICIT
|
||||
#define HAVE_CPP_USING
|
||||
#define HAVE_CPP_NEW_CASTS
|
||||
|
||||
/* HAVE_CPP_NEW_CASTS test is not strict enough yet. scc? */
|
||||
#if 0
|
||||
#ifndef HAVE_CPP_NEW_CASTS
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_NEW_CASTS
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef NEED_CPP_UNUSED_IMPLEMENTATIONS
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NEED_UNUSED_VIRTUAL_IMPLEMENTATIONS
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(__GNUG__) && (__GNUC_MINOR__ <= 90) && !defined(SOLARIS)
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_MEMBER_USING_DECLARATIONS
|
||||
|
||||
#if (defined(LINUX) || defined(__bsdi__)) && (__GNUC_MINOR__ <= 7)
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NEED_UNUSED_VIRTUAL_IMPLEMENTATIONS
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(SOLARIS) && !defined(__GNUG__)
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_EXPLICIT
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_NEW_CASTS
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_MEMBER_USING_DECLARATIONS
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(_MSC_VER)
|
||||
#if (_MSC_VER<1100)
|
||||
// before 5.0, VC++ couldn't handle explicit
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_EXPLICIT
|
||||
#undef HAVE_CPP_EXPLICIT
|
||||
#elif (_MSC_VER==1100)
|
||||
// VC++5.0 has an internal compiler error (sometimes) without this
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_MEMBER_USING_DECLARATIONS
|
||||
#undef HAVE_CPP_USING
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(IRIX) || defined(AIX)
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_MEMBER_USING_DECLARATIONS
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_EXPLICIT
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_NEW_CASTS
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(HPUX)
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_MEMBER_USING_DECLARATIONS
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_NEW_CASTS
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
/*
|
||||
If the compiler doesn't support |explicit|, we'll just make it go away, trusting
|
||||
that the builds under compilers that do have it will keep us on the straight and narrow.
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(AIX)
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_EXPLICIT
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_NEW_CASTS
|
||||
#define NSCAP_NO_MEMBER_USING_DECLARATIONS
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef NSCAP_NO_EXPLICIT
|
||||
This should probably be moved to "nscore.h".
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#ifndef HAVE_CPP_EXPLICIT
|
||||
#define explicit
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef NSCAP_NO_NEW_CASTS
|
||||
#define NSCAP_REINTERPRET_CAST(T,x) reinterpret_cast<T>(x)
|
||||
#else
|
||||
#define NSCAP_REINTERPRET_CAST(T,x) ((T)(x))
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef NSCAP_FEATURE_DEBUG_MACROS
|
||||
#define NSCAP_ADDREF(ptr) NS_ADDREF(ptr)
|
||||
#define NSCAP_RELEASE(ptr) NS_RELEASE(ptr)
|
||||
@ -351,7 +140,7 @@ class nsDerivedSafe : public T
|
||||
*/
|
||||
{
|
||||
private:
|
||||
#ifndef NSCAP_NO_MEMBER_USING_DECLARATIONS
|
||||
#ifdef HAVE_CPP_USING
|
||||
using T::AddRef;
|
||||
using T::Release;
|
||||
#else
|
||||
@ -359,14 +148,14 @@ class nsDerivedSafe : public T
|
||||
NS_IMETHOD_(nsrefcnt) Release(void);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
void operator delete( void* ); // NOT TO BE IMPLEMENTED
|
||||
void operator delete( void*, size_t ); // NOT TO BE IMPLEMENTED
|
||||
// declaring |operator delete| private makes calling delete on an interface pointer a compile error
|
||||
|
||||
nsDerivedSafe<T>& operator=( const nsDerivedSafe<T>& ); // NOT TO BE IMPLEMENTED
|
||||
// you may not call |operator=()| through a dereferenced |nsCOMPtr|, because you'd get the wrong one
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(NSCAP_NO_MEMBER_USING_DECLARATIONS) && defined(NSCAP_NEED_UNUSED_VIRTUAL_IMPLEMENTATIONS)
|
||||
#if !defined(HAVE_CPP_USING) && defined(NEED_CPP_UNUSED_IMPLEMENTATIONS)
|
||||
template <class T>
|
||||
nsrefcnt
|
||||
nsDerivedSafe<T>::AddRef()
|
||||
@ -415,7 +204,7 @@ dont_QueryInterface( T* aRawPtr )
|
||||
|
||||
struct nsQueryInterface
|
||||
{
|
||||
// explicit
|
||||
explicit
|
||||
nsQueryInterface( nsISupports* aRawPtr, nsresult* error = 0 )
|
||||
: mRawPtr(aRawPtr),
|
||||
mErrorPtr(error)
|
||||
@ -507,7 +296,6 @@ class nsCOMPtr_base
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
template <class T>
|
||||
class nsCOMPtr : private nsCOMPtr_base
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -583,7 +371,7 @@ class nsCOMPtr : private nsCOMPtr_base
|
||||
get() const
|
||||
// returns a |nsDerivedSafe<T>*| to deny clients the use of |AddRef| and |Release|
|
||||
{
|
||||
return NSCAP_REINTERPRET_CAST(nsDerivedSafe<T>*, mRawPtr);
|
||||
return NS_REINTERPRET_CAST(nsDerivedSafe<T>*, mRawPtr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
nsDerivedSafe<T>*
|
||||
@ -625,7 +413,7 @@ class nsCOMPtr : private nsCOMPtr_base
|
||||
T**
|
||||
StartAssignment()
|
||||
{
|
||||
return NSCAP_REINTERPRET_CAST(T**, begin_assignment());
|
||||
return NS_REINTERPRET_CAST(T**, begin_assignment());
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
@ -658,7 +446,7 @@ class nsGetterAddRefs
|
||||
operator void**()
|
||||
{
|
||||
// NS_PRECONDITION(mTargetSmartPtr != 0, "getter_AddRefs into no destination");
|
||||
return NSCAP_REINTERPRET_CAST(void**, mTargetSmartPtr.StartAssignment());
|
||||
return NS_REINTERPRET_CAST(void**, mTargetSmartPtr.StartAssignment());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
T*&
|
||||
|
@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ void
|
||||
nsCOMPtr_base::assign_with_QueryInterface( nsISupports* rawPtr, const nsIID& iid, nsresult* result )
|
||||
{
|
||||
nsresult status = NS_OK;
|
||||
if ( !rawPtr || !NS_SUCCEEDED( status = rawPtr->QueryInterface(iid, NSCAP_REINTERPRET_CAST(void**, &rawPtr)) ) )
|
||||
if ( !rawPtr || !NS_SUCCEEDED( status = rawPtr->QueryInterface(iid, NS_REINTERPRET_CAST(void**, &rawPtr)) ) )
|
||||
rawPtr = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if ( mRawPtr )
|
||||
@ -50,5 +50,5 @@ nsCOMPtr_base::begin_assignment()
|
||||
if ( mRawPtr )
|
||||
NSCAP_RELEASE(mRawPtr);
|
||||
mRawPtr = 0;
|
||||
return NSCAP_REINTERPRET_CAST(void**, &mRawPtr);
|
||||
return NS_REINTERPRET_CAST(void**, &mRawPtr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user