Enlarge the touch target of the caret to the left, bottom, and right by
59% (13px) per bug 1262755 comment 7.
Since the touch target becomes larger, the carets on the <input> in
previous test might cause the next test to fail on <textarea> because it
will press on the caret when trying to focus on <textarea>. Add <br>
elements to testAccessibleCarets.html to separate these test fields.
MozReview-Commit-ID: JIwmuHJ2QsQ
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 6fbfede7cc0e395402b5858d74480dcdd5606c35
Add a pref "layout.accessiblecaret.always_show_when_scrolling" defaults
to true on all platforms except b2g. When it is set to false, the carets
will be hidden during scrolling, which is the current behavior before
applying this change.
The pref "layout.accessiblecaret.extendedvisibility" was added for
Fennec to keep ActionBar open when carets temporarily hiding during
panning or zooming. Now we make carets always show by default, so the
pref can be removed. However, the floating toolbar still need to be
notified when the scrolling begins, so we dispatch "scroll" instead.
In gtest, the preference changes were in the middle of the test
function. To make the preference change clearer, I add new pref changes
or move the existing ones to the beginning of the test functions.
The 250ms transition effect added in ua.css is per request of UX
designer in bug 1249201 comment 12.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 8NGvDLPbtNY
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 3f7a9ebdf4c70b0282dbf9e8f18cbe5cca656dbe
Enlarge the touch target of the caret to the left, bottom, and right by
59% (13px) per bug 1262755 comment 7.
Since the touch target becomes larger, the carets on the <input> in
previous test might cause the next test to fail on <textarea> because it
will press on the caret when trying to focus on <textarea>. Add two <br>
to testAccessibleCarets.html to separate the <input> and <textarea>.
MozReview-Commit-ID: JIwmuHJ2QsQ
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 73b662980a5be55a4e3e31506437f2c26f65cd85
(This commit is effectively re-landing an assertion from changeset c1e9d6224c5a, aka bug 1208344 part 4. The rest of that patch is no longer needed, but this assertion is still useful.)
MozReview-Commit-ID: 7v5IwzS2CtP
(This commit is effectively re-landing changeset b3a36d79154f, aka bug 1208344 part 3. This re-landed version of the patch simply has unbitrotting fixes for indentation changes.)
MozReview-Commit-ID: BszOC5wyvBA
Currently if we have transition-property: 'all' and trigger a transition
on the 'color' property we will end up generating a transition on
-webkit-text-fill-color even if that property is disabled.
However, when we later call StyleAnimationValue::ToValue() in
nsTransitionManager::UpdateTransitions() to see if there are any transitions we
need to cancel, the comparison for currentValue != anim->ToValue() will pass
(since, as of the first patch in this patch series, ToValue() returns a null
value) so we end up cancelling the transition as soon as we create it).
Nevertheless, we will still trigger the warning introduced in the first patch
in this series when we call ToValue().
This patch stops us from creating transitions in the first place (and hence
triggering the warning). It also removes the code that suppresses transition
events for transitions on disabled properties since we should no longer be
generating such transitions in the first place (unless the pref is switched
while the transition is in motion which is probably not worth worrying about).
Note that we only test if the property is enabled for all content. This is
consistent with what we do throughout animation code including the existing
code in nsTransitionManager which iterates through shorthand sub-properties
using CSSPROPS_FOR_SHORTHAND_SUBPROPERTIES with the flag
nsCSSProps::eEnabledForAllContent.
The test case in this patch doesn't actually fail without this change, all it
does it trigger the warning in StyleAnimationValue::ToValue() introduced
in the first patch in this series. It's still a useful regression test however,
particularly if we later upgrade the warning in StyleAnimationValue::ToValue()
to a fatal assertion.
MozReview-Commit-ID: H9swDKLyiOf
I have verified that without the fix in the first patch in this series this
test fails, but passes with the fix applied.
MozReview-Commit-ID: JmncnapbVLa
This patch backs out changeset range 1f1884449dd4:0b5ed5e4a395 (all of the patches for bug 1208344) -- i.e. it backs out our support for "-webkit-box-orient". This patch also adds "fails" annotations to two reftests that depend on that feature, to reflect reality that these tests are now expected to fail (for the moment).
MozReview-Commit-ID: F8zGGg8R0Rn
