gfx::Color is currently misused in many places. The DrawTargets expect
the color space to be in device space, e.g. what we are actually going
to draw using. Everything sitting above generally deals with sRGB, as
specified in CSS. Sometimes we missed the conversion from sRGB to device
space when issuing draw calls, and similarly sometimes we converted the
color to device space twice.
This patch splits the type in two. sRGBColor and DeviceColor now
represent sRGB and device color spaces respectively. DrawTarget only
accepts DeviceColor, and one can get a DeviceColor from an sRGBColor via
the ToDeviceColor helper API. The reftests now pass with color
management enabled for everything (e.g. CSS) instead of just tagged
raster images.
There will be a follow up patch to enable color management everywhere by
default on all supported platforms.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D64771
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
The gap is caused by the difference between 'fixed margin' on the compositor
based on the state where the dynamic toolbar is completely visible and
position:fixed elements positioned by the time where is partially visible or
completely hidden. That's because the 'fixed margin' is computed based on the
bottom of the ICB whereas position:fixed elements are slightly shifted from the
ICB edge during the toolbar transition.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D52337
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
StaticPrefs.h will be removed two commits from now, so update these comments.
The patch removes the comment above SetUsesContainerScrolling() because it's
wrong -- it did use static prefs when introduced by bug 1181832 but then
stopped using static prefs in bug 1470504 -- and makes it inlinable.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D39133
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This implements the idea of automatically setting a content proc's
render root based on the render root enclosing the iframe that
points to it. There was a bit of cleanup in here that was a bit
tricky to extract from the core patch revolving around how we
use the Api(...) helper. This was to avoid the situation where
we use the Api(...) helper before our render root is initialized,
when we don't actually have to. I.e., when we just want the root
WebRenderAPI in all cases.
An alternative to this approach could be to fully built out the
WebRender transactions and just queue those up to be sent. However,
transaction building has various side effects which are committed
before the transaction is actually sent, so we would have to build
out some scheme for deferring those as well. This seemed simpler.
Patch primarily written by :dthayer
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D37078
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This implements the idea of automatically setting a content proc's
render root based on the render root enclosing the iframe that
points to it. There was a bit of cleanup in here that was a bit
tricky to extract from the core patch revolving around how we
use the Api(...) helper. This was to avoid the situation where
we use the Api(...) helper before our render root is initialized,
when we don't actually have to. I.e., when we just want the root
WebRenderAPI in all cases.
An alternative to this approach could be to fully built out the
WebRender transactions and just queue those up to be sent. However,
transaction building has various side effects which are committed
before the transaction is actually sent, so we would have to build
out some scheme for deferring those as well. This seemed simpler.
Patch primarily written by :dthayer
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D37078
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
And move the useful bits of it somewhere else (ServoStyleConstInlines.h for the
inline function definitions, and nsFrame.cpp for the static assertions).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D36120
And move the useful bits of it somewhere else (ServoStyleConstInlines.h for the
inline function definitions, and nsFrame.cpp for the static assertions).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D36120
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
And with some tidying some comments and removing stray #include "gfxPrefs.h"
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D31468
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
And with some tidying some comments and removing stray #include "gfxPrefs.h"
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D31468
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
And with some tidying some comments and removing stray #include "gfxPrefs.h"
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D31468
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This patch also renames `targetRect` to `snapArea` to represent it more
accurately.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D28307
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Now scroll-snap-type property on body element doesn't affect scroll position
so that scrollTo-scrollBy-snaps.html is needed to be modified to specify
scroll-snap-type on html.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D27987
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-scroll-snap-1/#scroll-snap-align
The main logic here is basically same as the old scroll snap implementation,
just iterating over all descendant elements in the scroll container and collect
snap positions. The differences are;
1) the snap positions are specified based on descendant elements instead of
points
2) the snap positions are able to be specified by `block` or `inline` keywords
so that we also need to care the element flow.
more test cases for this are coming in the next commit
3) the target rect is calculated by nsLayoutUtils::TransformFrameRectToAncestor
which means transform is already taken account into it (we have a bug for
the old scroll snap, it's bug 1218745)
some of web platform tests will be added in a subsequent commit
Some of test cases in overflowing-snap-areas.html that accidentally have
passed start failing with this change, all of them will be passed with
subsequent changes in these commit series.
Depends on D21627
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D21628
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
The tracking is done using nsAtom origins, similarly to how updates to the
scroll offset are tracked.
Currently, APZ still uses some heuristics to deduce that the main thread
originated a resolution change in some cases, but the intention is to try
to remove those and rely only on this mechanism in the future.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D13741
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
These macros tend to be handled quite poorly since the clang-format
tokenizer cannot figure out how to handle them.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D13179
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This commit attempts to lower the pain of modifying FrameMetrics.h.
It looks like most includes really only want ViewID or
ScrollableLayerGuid, so this commit factors them out into a separate
header. In the process FrameMetrics::ViewID is changed to
ScrollableLayerGuid::ViewID, which personally seems like a better
place for it now that we have RepaintRequest. Unfortunately that
requires a lot of places to be updated.
After this commit there are still a couple of major places that
FrameMetrics is included.
* nsDisplayList.h
* nsIScrollableFrame.h
* Layers.h
Those are going to be more tricky or impossible to fix so they're
not in this commit.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D10722
--HG--
rename : gfx/layers/FrameMetrics.h => gfx/layers/ScrollableLayerGuid.h
rename : gfx/layers/FrameMetrics.h => gfx/layers/ZoomConstraints.h
extra : rebase_source : 29ac79f91460a181bf7437af5c371207e22858e2
extra : source : c2e70e531075493fc6e374dcec862827f0bc6e77
This commit adds a scroll origin, nsGkAtoms::relative, which can be used to
mark main thread scrolling that can be combined with a concurrent APZ scroll.
The behavior of this is controlled by a pref, apz.relative-update. This pref
is initially activated and is intended as an aid to narrowing down causes
of regressions for users in bug reports.
Relative scroll updates work by tracking the last sent or accepted APZ
scroll offset. This is sent along with every FrameMetrics. Additionally,
a flag is added to FrameMetrics, mIsRelative, indicating whether the
scroll offset can be combined with a potential APZ scroll. When this
flag is set, AsyncPanZoomController will apply the delta between the sent
base scroll offset, and sent new scroll offset.
This flag is controlled by the last scroll origin on nsGfxScrollFrame. The
new origin, `relative`, is marked as being able to clobber APZ updates,
but can only be set if all scrolls since the last repaint request or
layers transaction have been relative.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D8234
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 51351a84c9cda228a0975e22eda3fd3bd8d261c4
extra : histedit_source : 4b564c19b16fe2bd26adc671b62b7cb6106e8163
FrameMetrics is currently used in about three ways.
1. Main thread to APZ transactions
2. Storing information in AsyncPanZoomController
3. APZ to main thread repaint requests
There's overlap in the use of fields in all these use cases, but it's not perfect. In a
following commit, I'd like to change the information used for (1) to support relative
scroll offset updates. This information isn't needed for (2) or (3), so it would be
good to refactor FrameMetrics out into these use cases.
This commit refactors out (3) as it is fairly easy to do. I'd like to refactor (2) out
as well, but that is trickier. I'd like to leave that for a future followup.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D7127
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : f0be2be24fce7d0f0ed25f6f3bfab5f7f2864f23
extra : source : fc9898a9ab28cee292e201ddaf757ee267179433
extra : histedit_source : 35415d3dc2c0ae0f269994c385cceff75f150020
