The major change in this patch is ::-moz-column-span-wrapper blocks are no
longer linked into the continuation chains when they're created in
CreateColumnSpanSiblings(). We can do that because
::-moz-column-span-wrapper is an non-inheriting anon box, which doesn't need
to be restyled.
This prevents RestyleManager::ProcessPostTraversal or
nsIFrame::UpdateStyleOfOwnedChildFrame, which set the same style on all
continuations of the frame they are working with, from overriding the
::-moz-column-span-wrapper style.
GetNextContinuationWithSameStyle was deleted in bug 1447367. Delete the comment
in nsInlineFrame::UpdateStyleOfOwnedAnonBoxesForIBSplit() to avoid confusion.
This patch also adds another condition to reframe the multi-column container
in MaybeRecreateContainerForFrameRemoval(). That condition is when an
element has a "column-span:all" descendant, i.e. the element's frame has
"column-span:all" siblings (which is created by CreateColumnSpanSiblings).
The added test multicol-span-all-dynamic-remove-006.html will fail without
this patch.
Depends on D5212
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D9988
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Other frames calling InitAndWrapInColumnSetFrameIfNeeded() needs to be
modified to support column-span (bug 1489295).
Depends on D5208
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D5209
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This patch re-enables the new behavior of bug 1479964, to set keyCode or
charCode of keypress event whose value is zero to the other's non-zero value.
However, some web apps are still broken with the new behavior. Therefore,
this patch adds a blacklist to keep using our legacy behavior in some specific
web apps.
Note that Google Docs, Gmail and Remember The Milk are reported as broken.
However, I don't see any broken shortcut with Gmail. Therefore, this patch
adds only Google Docs and Remeber The Milk into the blacklist.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D10322
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
In the case of WebRender there is no layers, but actually we'd been using it for
WebRender too, that's confusing.
Depends on D10689
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D10690
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
In case fuzzers or somebody can catch this in a reproducible way...
I'd be interested in knowing what the hell is going on.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D11053
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
In the case of WebRender there is no layers, but actually we'd been using it for
WebRender too, that's confusing.
Depends on D10689
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D10690
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Currently, GetSplittableType() is called only in
nsCSSFrameConstructor::CreateContinuingFrame(). The splittable concrete frames
should inherit from nsSplittableFrame, and must explicitly create continuing
frame in CreateContinuingFrame(). Thus, no need to maintain GetSplittableType().
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D10798
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
We can wait for the button fix if you want, but it was easy enough to fix, I
think.
I think we could merge NativeAnonymousContentRemoved with the walk that
NotifyFrameRemoved does, since the content should still be in the tree when that
happens. If you want, I can do that as a followup.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D10845
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This patch converts datetimebox.xml to datetimebox.js and loads it as a UA Widget,
while touches things here and there to make it work.
In HTMLInputElement manages the lifecycle of the datetimebox UA Widget.
It is loaded when in <input> has type date or time, or have its type switch to date or time.
nsDateTimeControlFrame is changed so that when UA Widget is enabled,
it would not generate <xul:datetimebox>.
Like bug 1483972, a check is added in nsCSSFrameConstructor::CreateGeneratedContentItem()
to make sure we don't generate pseudo content inside <input>.
Assertions in IntlUtils is changed to allow UAWidget to call the methods.
Depends on D9056
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D9057
--HG--
rename : toolkit/content/widgets/datetimebox.xml => toolkit/content/widgets/datetimebox.js
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
It doesn't make much sense to return const UniquePtr<Foo>& for something that
can't be null, it's just confusing.
Also make more stuff actually const.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D10647
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This commit attempts to lower the pain of modifying FrameMetrics.h.
It looks like most includes really only want ViewID or
ScrollableLayerGuid, so this commit factors them out into a separate
header. In the process FrameMetrics::ViewID is changed to
ScrollableLayerGuid::ViewID, which personally seems like a better
place for it now that we have RepaintRequest. Unfortunately that
requires a lot of places to be updated.
After this commit there are still a couple of major places that
FrameMetrics is included.
* nsDisplayList.h
* nsIScrollableFrame.h
* Layers.h
Those are going to be more tricky or impossible to fix so they're
not in this commit.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D10722
--HG--
rename : gfx/layers/FrameMetrics.h => gfx/layers/ScrollableLayerGuid.h
rename : gfx/layers/FrameMetrics.h => gfx/layers/ZoomConstraints.h
extra : rebase_source : 29ac79f91460a181bf7437af5c371207e22858e2
extra : source : c2e70e531075493fc6e374dcec862827f0bc6e77
1. Drop {Width|MinWidth|MaxWidh}DependsOnContainer() and
{Height|MinHeight|MaxHeight}DependsOnContainer() because they are bogus
after introducing the writing mode. Dropping these functions needs
update nsLineLayout because it is the only one who still use
these functions.
2. There are still some potential assertions and bugs on handling keywords
in the block size, so we should update them as well.
Depends on D9438
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D9439
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
1: Correct the Performance API 'NowUnclamped' to obtain a non-Fuzzed Timestamp
2: Do not compare fuzzed and non-fuzzed timestamps in a Refresh Driver assert,
since this happens so early on that we will eventually compare them and
asserting would be bad.
This commit adds a scroll origin, nsGkAtoms::relative, which can be used to
mark main thread scrolling that can be combined with a concurrent APZ scroll.
The behavior of this is controlled by a pref, apz.relative-update. This pref
is initially activated and is intended as an aid to narrowing down causes
of regressions for users in bug reports.
Relative scroll updates work by tracking the last sent or accepted APZ
scroll offset. This is sent along with every FrameMetrics. Additionally,
a flag is added to FrameMetrics, mIsRelative, indicating whether the
scroll offset can be combined with a potential APZ scroll. When this
flag is set, AsyncPanZoomController will apply the delta between the sent
base scroll offset, and sent new scroll offset.
This flag is controlled by the last scroll origin on nsGfxScrollFrame. The
new origin, `relative`, is marked as being able to clobber APZ updates,
but can only be set if all scrolls since the last repaint request or
layers transaction have been relative.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D8234
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 51351a84c9cda228a0975e22eda3fd3bd8d261c4
extra : histedit_source : 4b564c19b16fe2bd26adc671b62b7cb6106e8163
FrameMetrics is currently used in about three ways.
1. Main thread to APZ transactions
2. Storing information in AsyncPanZoomController
3. APZ to main thread repaint requests
There's overlap in the use of fields in all these use cases, but it's not perfect. In a
following commit, I'd like to change the information used for (1) to support relative
scroll offset updates. This information isn't needed for (2) or (3), so it would be
good to refactor FrameMetrics out into these use cases.
This commit refactors out (3) as it is fairly easy to do. I'd like to refactor (2) out
as well, but that is trickier. I'd like to leave that for a future followup.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D7127
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : f0be2be24fce7d0f0ed25f6f3bfab5f7f2864f23
extra : source : fc9898a9ab28cee292e201ddaf757ee267179433
extra : histedit_source : 35415d3dc2c0ae0f269994c385cceff75f150020
test_expanding_selection_per_page.html creates another window and requires
focus event on each case which creates editing host because
EditorEventListener::Focus() sets ancestor limit of Selection as the editing
host. Therefore, if the window itself does not have focus, focus event won't
be fired on editing hosts. So, the reason why the orange occurs almost all
with opt build is, debug build is enough slow to wait focus of new window
before running test.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D9473
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
We need to correctly populate the cumulative resolution field in the
ScrollMetadata in order to support zooming. Without this, the cumulative
resolution doesn't include the presShell resolution, and that results in
APZ getting into an inconsistent state.
Currently, the cumulative resolution is populated from the
ContainerLayerParameters object's scale, but in the case of WebRender,
we call ComputeScrollMetadata with an empty ContainerLayerParameters
since don't actually do layer building or rasterization in Gecko.
This patch makes this more explicit by changing the argument to a
Maybe<ContainerLayerParameters> and passing Nothing() from the WebRender
call sites.
In this scenario, we just use the cumulative presShell resolution as
the cumulative resolution, which should be correct for WebRender as
we won't have an "extra" CSS-derived resolution applied on the Gecko
side.
Depends on D9120
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D9121
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
PresShell::PageMove() climbs up to parent document when there is no scrollable
parent in current document. However, if aExtend is true, it should expand
Selection in the document itself. Therefore, it needs different rules to
look for container of expanding Selection from scrollable element to scroll.
Additionally, old rules (i.e., before the fix of bug 1369072 which caused
this regression) were also buggy. It used parent scrollable element or
root scrollable element simply. Therefore, if found scrollable element is
ancestor of selection limiter, it didn't work as expected.
This patch creates nsFrameSelection::GetFrameToPageSelect() to retrieve
per-page selection container element with the following rules:
- look for a scrollable element in selection limiter.
- if there is no scrollable element, use selection limiter.
- if there is no selection limiter, use the root frame.
So, nsFrameSelection::CommonPageMove() should take nsIFrame rather than
nsIScrollableFrame since container of per-page selection may be used in
non-scrollable contenteditable element. If it's called with non-scrollable
frame, it needs to compute the expanding range with the frame size.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D8954
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
And make will-change: position properly create an abspos cb while at it, since the check was missing the `mWillChangeBitfield & ABSPOS_CB` bit.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D8743
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
When we're creating a scrollframe with let's say, display: flex or grid, the
containing block is the grid container itself, but the transformed frame is the
scroll frame.
This is the only caller that (incorrectly) passes the same frame to
PushAbsoluteContainingBlock.
Our painting code deals with it, mostly, because it starts from the placeholder
to paint fixed items, and it hits the scrollframe, but it gets confused
sometimes causing the issue described here.
I'll find a way to add a crashtest for this, and maybe a reftest, though this
works in non-WR.
We should probably add a few more assertions to the frame constructor...
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D8724
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
In order to get the correct computed value of these keywords, we have to
make sure we store the correct computed values in sizing properties in
both inline axis and block axis.
-moz-max-content and -moz-min-content should behave as the property's
initial value in block axis. -moz-fit-content and -moz-available are not
supported in block axis, so we also treat them as initial values.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D8290
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
