An OuterDoc shouldn't get accessibility focus itself.
Focus should always go to something inside it.
However, OOP iframes will get DOM focus because their content isn't in this process.
We now suppress the OuterDoc focus in this case.
The OOP browser will fire focus for the correct Accessible inside the embedded document.
Without suppression of the OuterDoc focus, the two focus events will race and the OuterDoc focus may override the correct embedded focus for accessibility clients.
Even if they fired in the correct order, clients may report extraneous focus information to the user before reporting the correct focus.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D52126
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
OuterDocAccessible has some special behaviour.
We really shouldn't try to use some other class for iframes.
Anyway, making an iframe part of an ARIA table won't work for other reasons, plus I'm not sure it makes much sense.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D50769
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Please note that it is the first reformat with clang-format 9
I only saw a fix in the .mm file
# ignore-this-changeset
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D49056
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
When XBL is disabled, no code in dom/xbl will be built. Also, adds ifdefs
to remove any of the XBL related code elsewhere. There's definitely more
that can be done here, but I think it's better to wait to do the rest of
the cleanup when we actually remove the code.
Depends on D45612
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D45613
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This is an extension protocol that can be used for platform specific
API (ie. AccessibleWrap methods).
I'm not thrilled with the seperate constructor for the sub-protocol.
This means that the parent won't have the actor upon DocAccessibleParent
construction, and some timing bugs can arise because of the extra round
trip. It would be cool if both actors could be co-created, but that
would require ManagedEndpoint, and for PBrowser to manage them both. I
don't want to expose this to PBrowser.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D37955
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This is an extension protocol that can be used for platform specific
API (ie. AccessibleWrap methods).
I'm not thrilled with the seperate constructor for the sub-protocol.
This means that the parent won't have the actor upon DocAccessibleParent
construction, and some timing bugs can arise because of the extra round
trip. It would be cool if both actors could be co-created, but that
would require ManagedEndpoint, and for PBrowser to manage them both. I
don't want to expose this to PBrowser.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D37955
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This is an extension protocol that can be used for platform specific
API (ie. AccessibleWrap methods).
I'm not thrilled with the seperate constructor for the sub-protocol.
This means that the parent won't have the actor upon DocAccessibleParent
construction, and some timing bugs can arise because of the extra round
trip. It would be cool if both actors could be co-created, but that
would require ManagedEndpoint, and for PBrowser to manage them both. I
don't want to expose this to PBrowser.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D37955
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This change will bring us on par with what Chrome does. However, if the author makes an error in applying a landmark role to an interactive element, or other element where the landmark role is illegal, as defined in the [WAI-ARIA in HTML specification section 2](https://www.w3.org/TR/html-aria/#document-conformance-requirements-for-use-of-aria-attributes-in-html), the accessible properties will now be that of the landmark role, no longer that of the native host language element. This might make some elements less accessible due to author error than before, but we currently do not know of examples in the wild that actually expose this problem. This could only be solved by applying the rules from said table also in the user agents, but that is not specified anywhere.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D41923
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Previously, if a hidden, aria-owned subtree was shown and aria-activedescendant was simultaneously targeted inside it, aria-activedescendant would fail.
This occurred because when we processed insertions, the presence of aria-owns meant we didn't create the subtree.
This meant that when we processed aria-activedescendant (which occurred before relocations), the active descendant didn't exist yet.
To fix this, we now process generic notifications (including aria-activedescendant) *after* relocations.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D40579
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
We naively remove and then recreate accessibles when their content's
frame is reconstructed. By delaying the removal until we are certain the
content does not have a new layout frame, we can cut down on redundant
recreations.
When reconstructed content is re-inserted we can check it and its
subtree for missing frames and prune those accessibles from the tree.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D38380
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
It seems a bit more sensible to me that if any filtering needs to happen
from content insertions, it should happen in the doc and not the
notification controller.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D40132
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
In FocusManager::ProcessFocusEvent, after firing the event, we get the anchor jump from the target Accessible's document.
However, it seems the Accessible can be shut down during the call to nsEventShell::FireEvent, resulting in a crash when we try to get the anchor jump.
Protect against this by checking whether the target is defunct after firing the event.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D39450
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This was an oversight in the checkin for bug 1461244. tfoot was duplicated due to a copy and paste error, thead was not mapped at all. It is now properly mapped, and the test adjusted accordingly.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D39305
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
IDRefsIterator::GetElem was previously an instance method which could only be used if you instantiated IDRefsIterator.
This is overkill for attributes which can only take a single id reference (rather than an id reference list).
Now, there is a static version of IDRefsIterator::GetElem which can be called with an arbitrary source element.
Any accessibility code should henceforth be using this instead of calling GetElementById directly, as this deals with shadow DOM, etc.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D38832
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
