mozilla/js/rhino/org is now distributed between
mozilla/js/rhino/src and mozilla/js/rhino/toolsrc.
The build.xml has been split in three.
Docs now live in the project directory.
These changes mean that the cvs directories mirror the distribution and thus a distribution
will build the same way as a cvs build.
I attach optimization patch for NativeDate that makes all js... methods
private, removes passing of unnecessary parameters and replaces
checkInstance by realThis call with false as the third parameter.
Regards, Igor
Hi, Norris!
Here is another small optimization for NativeDate in DayFromMonth method
where it replaces arrays by few ifs.
Regards, Igor
Rhino: patch for IdScriptable.java and question about useDynamicScope
Date:
Mon, 16 Apr 2001 17:55:19 +0200
From:
Igor Bukanov <igor.bukanov@windriver.com>
Organization:
Wind River
To:
Norris Boyd <nboyd@atg.com>
Hi, Norris!
Here is a patch to IdScriptable.java that fixes sealed semantic and
makes Something.prototype.constructor to behave just as having DONTENUM
attribute, not DONTENUM|READONLY|PERMANENT. It also renames
seal_function to sealFunctions.
I also have a following question. I added nextInstanceCheck to
IdScriptable.java and its usage in realThis in NativeDate to emulate
code from FunctionObject where it looks up prototype in search for
NativeSomething instance if useDynamicScope is true. But could you
describe why it is necessary? I can understand why doing something like
var proto = new Date();
function Test() { }
Test.prototype = proto;
var test = new Test();
print(test.getDay()); // same as proto.getDay()
would be useful in ceratain situations, but what it has to do with
shared scopes?
Regards, Igor
Minor fix to JSDebugger
Date:
Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:34:24 -0800
From:
Christopher Oliver <coliver@mminternet.com>
Organization:
Primary Interface LLC
To:
nboyd@atg.com
Hi Norris,
Attached is a minor fix to the JSDebugger GUI that causes the tool-bar buttons to all have the same width.
I checked out and modified a file from CVS today. See the screenshot below.
Cheers,
Chris
* fixed ImporterTopLevel constructor - it now calls
cx.initStandardObjects before defining any functions. The old
constructor is still around for backwards compatibility.
Rhino Context.setTargetClassFileName() null pointer exception
Date:
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 15:28:20 -0800
From:
"Ryan Manwiller" <rdm@europa.com>
Organization:
Another Netscape Collabra Server User
Newsgroups:
netscape.public.mozilla.jseng
I'm setting the file name to compile to a file. However, on subsequent
compiles, I don't want to compile to a file, so I tried
setTargetClassFileName(null). This causes a NullPpinterException in
OptClassNameHelper.setTargetClassFileName(OptClassNameHelper.java:76)
It seems that Context.setTargetClassFileName() should check for null.
Thanks
Subject:
Rhino Exception Handling: Inconsistency btw Old/New Versions of 1.5
Date:
Mon, 05 Feb 2001 06:07:07 -0800
From:
Timothy Bergeron <bergeron@resumerabbit.com>
Organization:
Another Netscape Collabra Server User
Newsgroups:
netscape.public.mozilla.jseng
I've been using Rhino for about a year with almost no problems. However,
I downloaded the latest Rhino tip (rhino15R2pre) and discovered a
significant difference in exception handling.
I rely heavily on JavaScript code like the following:
try {
var em = new ExceptionMaker();
em.npe(); // method throws a java.lang.NullPointerException
//em.ae(); // method throws a Packages.AutomationException
}
catch (e if (e instanceof java.lang.NullPointerException)) {
java.lang.System.out.println("Caught a NullPointerException");
e.printStackTrace();
}
catch (e if (e instanceof Packages.AutomationException)) {
java.lang.System.out.println("Caught an AutomationException");
}
catch (e) {
java.lang.System.out.println("Caught an unexpected exception: "+e);
}
finally {
java.lang.System.out.println("Finally!");
}
Previous Rhino versions worked as expected. The exception thrown from
within the host object would be caught and the appropriate actions could
be taken.
With the most recent tip, the thrown exceptions simply are not caught
within the JavaScript. They propagate back to the Java function invoking
the (in my case) Context.evaluateReader() method.
Running the above JS fragement with the older tip displayed the
following stack trace (when the NullPointerException was caught):
Rhino Version: JavaScript-Java 1.5 release 1 2000 03 15
Caught a NullPointerException
java.lang.NullPointerException
at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Throwable.java:84)
at java.lang.Exception.<init>(Exception.java:35)
at java.lang.RuntimeException.<init>(RuntimeException.java:39)
at
java.lang.NullPointerException.<init>(NullPointerException.java:45)
at ExceptionMaker.jsFunction_npe(ExceptionMaker.java:13)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
at
org.mozilla.javascript.FunctionObject.call(FunctionObject.java:497)
at
org.mozilla.javascript.ScriptRuntime.call(ScriptRuntime.java:1205)
at org.mozilla.javascript.gen.c1.call(exception.js:3)
at org.mozilla.javascript.gen.c1.exec(exception.js)
at
org.mozilla.javascript.Context.evaluateReader(Context.java:739)
at js.main(js.java:14)
Finally!
When run with the latest tip, the output is:
Rhino Version: JavaScript-Java 1.5 release 1 2000 03
15 Finally!
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Throwable.java:84)
at java.lang.Exception.<init>(Exception.java:35)
at java.lang.RuntimeException.<init>(RuntimeException.java:39)
at
java.lang.NullPointerException.<init>(NullPointerException.java:45)
at ExceptionMaker.jsFunction_npe(ExceptionMaker.java:13)
at inv2.invoke()
at
org.mozilla.javascript.FunctionObject.doInvoke(FunctionObject.java:843)
at
org.mozilla.javascript.FunctionObject.call(FunctionObject.java:486)
at
org.mozilla.javascript.ScriptRuntime.call(ScriptRuntime.java:1199)
at org.mozilla.javascript.gen.c1.call(Unknown Source)
at org.mozilla.javascript.gen.c1.exec(Unknown Source)
at
org.mozilla.javascript.Context.evaluateReader(Context.java:778)
at js.main(js.java:14)
Curiously, both Rhino versions seem to be returning the same string from
Context.getImplementionVerison();
Anyway, the results from the two runs are clearly different: In the
first case, the exception is thown, the correct catch block is invoked
(hence the stace trace), and the finally block is invoked. In the second
case, the exception is thrown, the finally block is invoked, and the
exception is handled by the calling Java method rather than being
handled by the JavaScript code.
After some research, it appears this change was introducted by a
modification to FunctionObject.call() (See
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64788) which used to have:
try {
Object result = (method != null)
? method.invoke(thisObj, invokeArgs)
: ctor.newInstance(invokeArgs);
return hasVoidReturn ? Undefined.instance : result;
}
but now has:
Object result = method == null ?
ctor.newInstance(invokeArgs)
: doInvoke(thisObj,
invokeArgs);
If I comment out the new code and replace it with the old, the expected
exception handling returns. Is this just an oversight or the new
expected behavior? Are there any negative side effects (other then the
speed decrease in method invocation) if I use the latest tip but use the
old method invocation procedure in FunctionObject.call() rather than the
new?
Re: [Rhino in Java] compiling .js to class file gives "bad local" error
Date:
Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:41:45 +0100
From:
"Sylvia E. Schleutermann" <ses@h-m-s.com>
Organization:
.hms Health Management Systems
Newsgroups:
netscape.public.mozilla.jseng
References:
1 , 2
I have found out some more. Looking really quickly over the JVM specs, I
found that
indeed the astore-command requires that the variables index be below 128.
However,
the book also said that if more index space is needed, a "wide" command can
be used to
be able to address up to 65xxx variables.
Question: is there a possibility to integrate this "wide"-command into the
class compiler?
Some option, that can be set? Or am I on the wrong tracks?
Please help, since I want to avoid spreading the script over many classes to
avoid the
size limitation. Cheers, Sylvia
Sylvia E. Schleutermann <ses@h-m-s.com> wrote in message
news:956sv9$9g53@secnews.netscape.com...
> I have found out that it is definitely the number of variables.
> I removed all variables and then the script compiled into class files
> with one base class and inner classes for each function in the script.
>
> What is the limitation exactly, i.e. does anyone know how many (global)
> variables
> I can use? Or is there some other kind of work around?
>
> Cheers, Sylvia
>
>
> Sylvia E. Schleutermann <ses@h-m-s.com> wrote in message
> news:956qtv$6kh3@secnews.netscape.com...
> > Hello,
> > when compiling a *.js file to class file, I get a "bad local" runtime
> > exception.
> > Stepping through the source, the following happens in reverse order:
> >
> > Codegen.xstore (75, 58, 209)
> > -> in the switch - default case, there is a comparison
> > for local (=209), which is compared to Byte.MAX_VALUE (=127).
> > When greater, the above exception is thrown.
> >
> > Codegen.astore (209)
> > -> calls Codegen.xstore (ByteCode.ASTORE_0, ByteCode.ASTORE, 209)
> >
> > Codegen.generatePrologue (<context>, <tree>, true, -1) // -1 is
> > directParameterCount
> > -> sets itsZeroArgArray = getNewWordLocal(); // here, the 209 is
> > produced
> > -> calls astore (itsZeroArgArray)
> >
> > From what I can read from the source code, the 209 seems to be a counter
> for
> > "locals", perhaps
> > local variables?? The function that is being compiled does initialize
many
> > variables - would it help
> > to move the initialize code out of the function into separate code
blocks?
> >
> > The function looks like this
> >
> > function rule_Disclaimer()
> > {
> > try { VAR1 = <init code 1>;} catch (exception) { VAR1 = <default
init
> > code 1>; }
> > try { VAR2 = <init code 2>;} catch (exception) { VAR2 = <default
init
> > code 2>;}
> > ... (about 58 such variables)
> >
> > var cond = true;
> >
> > < rest of code>
> > }
> >
> > When I compile the script for interpreted mode, all works well. The
> > variables VAR1 to VAR58 are to be global
> > variables (global to the whole script).
> >
> > I appreciate any help! Thanks, Sylvia
> >
> >
>
>
expressions. The method "prefix" on a RegExp behaves exactly the same
as the "exec" method except it returns "undefined" if the match failed
because there was an insufficient number of characters in the
input. E.g.
/^foo/.prefix("foo") => ["foo"] (just like exec)
/^foo/.prefix("fox") => null (just like exec)
/^foo/.prefix("fo") => undefined (whereas exec returns null)
Subject:
[Rhino] Question
Date:
Tue, 30 Jan 2001 20:18:21 +0900
From:
"get21" <get21@secsm.org>
Organization:
Another Netscape Collabra Server User
Newsgroups:
netscape.public.mozilla.jseng
I found something unusual to me when I hacking the Rhino source code.
In tagify method of NativeString Class,
When it adds tag to its string(this.string), it does not use quotation
marks.
For example, the result of tagify("A HREF", "A", value) in
jsFunction_link(String value) is
<A HREF=Some Value>Original String Value</A>
Not,
<A HREF="Some Value">Original String Value</A>
This question might sound silly, but I'm curious why.
Thanks in advance,
Nam
--
email : get21@secsm.org
home : http://get21.secsm.org
phone : 011-9092-1802
Subject:
minor Rhino bug
Date:
Tue, 23 Jan 2001 13:14:51 -0800
From:
dave russo <d-russo@ti.com>
To:
nboyd@atg.com
CC:
d-russo@ti.com
Norris,
While using the new Rhino debugger (from the latest tip) I started to get "No
Context associated with current Thread" exceptions when expanding host objects
in the "Context:" debugger window.
In looking at the code, I discovered that NativeObject.toString seems to assume
that Context.getContext() may return null. In fact, getContext() always returns
a non-null context or throws an exception.
I changed NativeObject.toString to never throw an exception (see below) and this
eliminated the problem I was seeing (of course).
It would be nice to incorporate this in a future Rhino tip or, if this change is
inappropriate, any guidance would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
I changed NativeObject.toString to:
public String toString() {
try {
Context cx = Context.getContext();
return jsFunction_toString(cx, this, null, null);
}
catch (Exception e) {
return "[object " + getClassName() + "]";
}
}
from:
public String toString() {
Context cx = Context.getContext();
if (cx != null)
return jsFunction_toString(cx, this, null, null);
else
return "[object " + getClassName() + "]";
}
Re: Small usage simplification for Rhino
Date:
Tue, 23 Jan 2001 16:01:42 +0100
From:
Igor Bukanov <igor@icesoft.no>
To:
Norris Boyd <nboyd@atg.com>
References:
1 , 2 , 3 , 4
Norris Boyd wrote:
> Thanks. I've patched in your changes and checked it into CVS.
I also looked at other places with similar pattern of few lines of
common code to construct error messages. The following was occurred too
often not to avoid temptations to move it to a separated function:
NativeGlobal.constructError(
Context.getContext(), "TypeError",
ScriptRuntime.getMessage1("msg.default.value", arg),
this)
It can be replaced by
NativeGlobal.typeError1("msg.default.value", arg, this)
There are other similar usages but they are not to frequent to bother
with code reduction because even the above replacement saves just 200
bytes in uncompressed jars (it is expensive to introduce new methods in
Java).
In any case, if you think it makes any sense, patches are attached. They
are made via
diff -cbB javascript.orig javascript > patch_context
diff -bB javascript.orig javascript > patch_std
from org/mozilla directory.
Regards, Igor
Subject:
Recent rhino broke security support
Date:
Tue, 23 Jan 2001 08:07:45 -0500
From:
"Kurt Westerfeld" <kurt@managedobjects.com>
To:
"Norris Boyd" <nboyd@atg.com>
Norris.....I like the changes made to FunctionObject to do method invocation
much faster. Very slick.
Problem tho: this mechanism does not veer into the security support plugin
on context for defining a class. This is crucial do creating event adapter
code later in applet environments.
I'm going to look into this, but perhaps you could probably make the changes
faster than I.
Unfortunately for us, we found this problem yesterday at a customer site.
:-( Shame on us.
________________________________________________________________________
Kurt Westerfeld
Senior Software Architect
Managed Objects
mailto:kwester@ManagedObjects.com
703.770.7225
http://www.ManagedObjects.com
Managed Objects: manage technology > rule business
[Fwd: My Mistake in ScriptRuntime method]]]
Date:
Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:48:26 +0100
From:
Igor Bukanov <igor@icesoft.no>
To:
Norris Boyd <nboyd@atg.com>
Hi, Norris!
With my previous patch to fix in
org/mozilla/javascript/ScriptRuntime.java Integer.MIN_VALUE as index
problem I also added a bug to the unrelated code: I tried to minimize
object creation and unfortunately that untested "optimization" slippet
into my patch as well.
I replaced the lines 290, 291 in toNumber(String s) method from
String sub = s.substring(start, end+1);
if (sub.equals("Infinity"))
to
if (s.regionMatches(start, "Infinity", 0, 8))
But that should be
if (start + 7 == end && s.regionMatches(start, "Infinity", 0, 8))
Sory for troubles, Igor
290c290
< if (s.regionMatches(start, "Infinity", 0, 8))
---
> if (start + 7 == end && s.regionMatches(start, "Infinity", 0, 8))
Re: Debugger problem
Date:
Mon, 08 Jan 2001 14:16:30 -0800
From:
Christopher Oliver <coliver@mminternet.com>
Organization:
Primary Interface LLC
To:
Kurt Westerfeld <kurt@ManagedObjects.com>
CC:
Norris Boyd <nboyd@atg.com>
References:
1 , 2 , 3
Kurt, Norris,
Yes, with the change to the shell this should be possible. The problem before
was that if you loaded the same file with different relative path names, two
different windows in the debugger were created because everything (windows,
breakpoints, etc) is keyed off the source name.
The attached file contains the fix (and includes the workaround for
Desktop.getSelectedFrame).
There are still some bugs in transferring focus between the windows in the
Desktop. I haven't had time to track down the problem or a solution.
Chris
Kurt Westerfeld wrote:
> I would point out that "Source Name" of a script isn't necessarily a
> filename. In our system, scripts are run remotely from a script library
> that has no file system backing. Canonicalizing the file names is really
> unnecessary.
>
> Can't you just modify JSDebugger to not care what the name of the file is?
> If access to the original script is unavailable except through the file
> system, I'd be surprised.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Christopher Oliver <coliver@mminternet.com>
> To: Kurt Westerfeld <kurt@ManagedObjects.com>
> Cc: Norris Boyd <nboyd@atg.com>
> Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2001 2:23 AM
> Subject: Re: Debugger problem
>
> > Hi Kurt,
> >
> > I rather would say that it is a problem with the processFile method in the
> > shell's Main class. If you change the current working directory or the
> value
> > of the System property "user.dir" after compiling a script, relative path
> names
> > can become ambiguous. Norris, would it be ok to modify the shell to
> > "canonicalize" the names of files it compiles? That way the source name
> that
> > shows up in the stack and in DebuggableScript will always be unique. For
> > example:
> >
> > public static void processFile(Context cx, Scriptable scope,
> > String filename)
> > {
> > Reader in = null;
> > try {
> > in = new PushbackReader(new FileReader(filename));
> > int c = in.read();
> > // Support the executable script #! syntax: If
> > // the first line begins with a '#', treat the whole
> > // line as a comment.
> > if (c == '#') {
> > while ((c = in.read()) != -1) {
> > if (c == '\n' || c == '\r')
> > break;
> > }
> > ((PushbackReader) in).unread(c);
> > } else {
> > // No '#' line, just reopen the file and forget it
> > // ever happened. OPT closing and reopening
> > // undoubtedly carries some cost. Is this faster
> > // or slower than leaving the PushbackReader
> > // around?
> > in.close();
> > in = new FileReader(filename);
> > }
> > filename = new java.io.File(filename).getCanonicalPath();
> > <<<====== Add this
> > }
> > catch (FileNotFoundException ex) {
> > Context.reportError(ToolErrorReporter.getMessage(
> > "msg.couldnt.open",
> > filename));
> > exitCode = EXITCODE_FILE_NOT_FOUND;
> > return;
> > } catch (IOException ioe) {
> > globalState.getErr().println(ioe.toString());
> > }
> >
> > // Here we evalute the entire contents of the file as
> > // a script. Text is printed only if the print() function
> > // is called.
> > evaluateReader(cx, scope, in, filename, 1);
> > }
> >
> >
> > Attached is *my* latest version of the debugger code. Norris, have you
> made
> > any progress on cvs commit priveledges? The attached version fixes a
> number of
> > GUI bugs:
> >
> > 1) If you undocked the Variables window and popped up the Context
> combo-box and
> > then closed the window with the system menu, the Context pop-up was not
> cleaned
> > up properly.
> > 2) The first time you minimize a file window it appeared to dissappear
> when you
> > tried to restore it. This was due to the fact that I forgot to "pack" its
> > contents and as a result its requested size was 0x0.
> >
> > I also added a menu item to toggle whether to break on exceptions and one
> which
> > allows you to open (and compile) a JavaScript file without actually
> executing
> > it.
> >
> > I have also attached a Word document with some basic documentation for the
> > Debugger.
> >
> > Note that this version also includes all the changes to support debugging
> > scripts in the AWT dispatch thread.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > Kurt Westerfeld wrote:
> >
> > > Hello. I ran into a null pointer exception in JSDebugger tonight, and I
> > > thought I'd drop you a note.
> > >
> > > The problem line is 2336, where a breakpoint is hit. To simulate, load
> the
> > > debugger using the command line syntax on a file that has not been
> resolved
> > > to cannonical path.
> > >
> > > Example,
> > >
> > > jshell -debug -f \myfile.fs
> > >
> > > At any rate, the "handleCompilationDone" routine takes \myfile.fs and
> turns
> > > it into a canonical path. If you hit a breakpoint in this file and say
> > > "go", when the breakpoint hits the file is not found, because the same
> > > canonical path resolution is not done. The resolution seems dubious,
> since
> > > it is only done in the compilation done callback, but I don't know the
> best
> > > way to suggest a fix since it seems that code had some purpose.
> > >
> > > Anyway, thought you'd wanna know.
> > >
> > > ________________________________________________________________________
> > > Kurt Westerfeld
> > > Senior Software Architect
> > > Managed Objects
> > > mailto:kwester@ManagedObjects.com
> > > 703.770.7225
> > > http://www.ManagedObjects.com
> > >
> > > Managed Objects: manage technology > rule business
> >
JSDebugger.java
Name:
JSDebugger.java
Type:
Java Class File (java/*)
Encoding:
base64
* Make use of DebuggableEngine interface to keep Context API smaller
* Change org.mozilla.javascript.debug.Frame to DebugFrame to avoid
confusion with java.awt.Frame
Subject:
Re: Rhino bug - Wrapper ??
Date:
Fri, 05 Jan 2001 03:46:11 +0530
From:
Mukund Balasubramanian <mukund@cs.stanford.edu>
Organization:
Another Netscape Collabra Server User
Newsgroups:
netscape.public.mozilla.jseng
References:
1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6
That works too,
Should I assume that this would be a part of the next tip ? I agree with the
part about
overloading code too.
Anyways, thanks a load for your help and just tell me if I could be of any
help in any other
respects of the rhino project.
ThanX,
Mukund Balasubaramanian
Norris Boyd wrote:
> Actually, I was considering removing the unwrapping code from
NativeJavaConstructor. I was
> suprised that it was there. The code dates from before we implemented proper
method and
> constructor overloading in Rhino. It's the overloading code that should have
the responsibility
> for unwrapping.
>
> Does this patch work for you:
>
> Index: NativeJavaObject.java
> ===================================================================
> RCS file:
/cvsroot/mozilla/js/rhino/org/mozilla/javascript/NativeJavaObject.java
> ,v
> retrieving revision 1.29
> diff -u -r1.29 NativeJavaObject.java
> --- NativeJavaObject.java 2000/11/13 22:10:32 1.29
> +++ NativeJavaObject.java 2001/01/04 21:33:55
> @@ -673,6 +673,12 @@
>
> return Result;
> }
> + else if (value instanceof Wrapper) {
> + value = ((Wrapper)value).unwrap();
> + if (type.isInstance(value))
> + return value;
> + reportConversionError(value, type);
> + }
> else {
> reportConversionError(value, type);
> }
>
> This handles the case where the object is both a Scriptable and a Wrapper.
>
> --N
>
> Mukund Balasubramanian wrote:
>
> > Yes they do implement Scriptable.
> > From my preliminary inspection of the code, findFunction seems to be
preceediong the
> > coerceType call and I presume findFunction call is going to fail if the
arguments are
> > wrapped (bad types mismatching signature).
> > The constructor case DOES go through an explicit unwrapping stage as
shown by the cut
> > and paste code. My question is whether the same preamble in NativeJavaMethod
is a valid bug
> > fix.
> >
> > ThanX,
> >
> > Mukund Balasubramanian
> >
> > Norris Boyd wrote:
> >
> > > Do your objects that implement Wrapper also implement Scriptable? From
simple inspection
> > > of the code I'd think that both the constructor and method cases would go
through
> > > NativeJavaMethod.coerceType, which should unwrap. However, Scriptable
objects are picked
> > > off and handled before any unwrapping is considered.
> > >
> > > --N
> > >
> > > Mukund Balasubramanian wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yup,
> > > > Here it is - Line numbers 173-178 are cut and paste from
> > > > NativeJavaConstructor.java inside NativeJavaMethod.java
> > > >
> > > > /*** Call in NativeJavaMethod.java
> > > > public Object call(Context cx, Scriptable scope, Scriptable thisObj,
> > > > Object[] args)
> > > > throws JavaScriptException
> > > > {
> > > > // Eliminate useless args[0] and unwrap if required
> > > > for (int i = 0; i < args.length; i++) {
> > > > if (args[i] instanceof Wrapper) {
> > > > args[i] = ((Wrapper)args[i]).unwrap();
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > // Find a method that matches the types given.
> > > > if (methods.length == 0) {
> > > > ****/
> > > >
> > > > Is this correct ? I presume it is because of the fact that the
constructor
> > > > does this.
> > > >
> > > > Any luck with my other question regarding generalizing the WrapHandler
to all
> > > > objects (including those returned by scriptable) and not only those
returned
> > > > through nativeJava***
> > > >
> > > > ThanX,
> > > >
> > > > Mukund Balasubramanian
> > > >
> > > > Norris Boyd wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Could you post your proposed patch?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Norris
> > > > >
> > > > > Mukund Balasubramanian wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > I am trying to play around with writing a custom WrapHandler for
my
> > > > > > Java objects in Rhino. I found WrapHandler very useful.
> > > > > > Now I am stuck at a point where, even though my wrappers
implement
> > > > > > "Wrapper", they get unwrapped only on calles to Constructors using
> > > > > > Liveconnect. Normal methods dont seem to be doing any unwrapping.
> > > > > > Managed to build rhino with a bug fix (cut and paste code from
> > > > > > NativeJavaConstructor to NativeJavamethod), and it works.
> > > > > > Just wanted to verify if it is a known bug (while I wait for
> > > > > > bugzilla to mail me a passwd).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > BTW, also found something interesting, WrapHandler gets called only
when
> > > > > > the object is returned from NativeJava***, not ANY Object. Is that
the
> > > > > > way it is supposed to work ??
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ThanX for any help,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mukund Balasubramanian
Subject:
[Rhino] Script compiler bug?
Date:
Tue, 12 Dec 2000 22:08:23 GMT
From:
dave russo <d-russo@ti.com>
Organization:
Deja.com
Newsgroups:
netscape.public.mozilla.jseng
The following script does not seem to compile properly (using Rhino
1.5R1):
test.js:
var test = {};
test.foo = function () { print('foo')}
test.bar = function () { print('bar')}
After compiling test.js ("java org.mozilla.javascript.tools.jsc.Main
test.js"):
js> loadClass('test')
js> test.foo()
bar
js> load('test.js')
js> test.foo()
foo
Note that changing test.js to read:
var test = {};
test.foo = function foo() { print('foo')}
test.bar = function bar() { print('bar')}
Works around the problem. Is there a problem with anonymous functions?
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
