Per spec these should just go directly to the expando object; we were ignoring them instead.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D16930
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This warning (as an error) is showing up with this patch due to the new
use of AddEventListenerOptions in ChromeUtilsBinding.h. That header is
included in some codegen units which have this warning enabled, which
revealed the issue.
I believe the warning is spurious in this case, but fixing it doesn't
seem like a big deal. Requesting review from Boris, as he added the
comment 6 years ago.
Depends on D20015
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D20824
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Consequently, this removes:
- MOZ_LIBPRIO, which is now always enabled.
- non_msvc_compiler, which is now always true.
- The cl.py wrapper, since it's not used anymore.
- CL_INCLUDES_PREFIX, which was only used for the cl.py wrapper.
- NONASCII, which was only there to ensure CL_INCLUDES_PREFIX still
worked in non-ASCII cases.
This however keeps a large part of detecting and configuring for MSVC,
because we still do need it for at least headers, libraries, and midl.
Depends on D19614
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D19615
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
When we mark call expressions as breakpoints, we want to make it as likely
as possible that the call has its own unique positon. The existing logic
means that it is more likely that the beginning of a call will align
with the start of an expression statement or other debuggable step point.
By using the property-access location, we're less likely to collide.
Thid also adds a new bytecodes that were missed in the original code that
added this position handling logic.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D17661
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
When we mark call expressions as breakpoints, we want to make it as likely
as possible that the call has its own unique positon. The existing logic
means that it is more likely that the beginning of a call will align
with the start of an expression statement or other debuggable step point.
By using the property-access location, we're less likely to collide.
Thid also adds a new bytecodes that were missed in the original code that
added this position handling logic.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D17661
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
The class contains original full referrer and referrer policy will be
applied to the referrer.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D17923
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
With these changes, XBL just runs in the window scope of whatever document it's
attached to. Since (outside of tests and "remote XUL") we no longer attach XBL
to web documents, this is fine. And "remote XUL" already ran without the XBL
scope.
Native anonymous content, which used to be placed in the XBL scope to hide it
from the page, is now placed in the unprivileged junk scope, so it stays hidden
from the page.
dom/xbl/test/test_bug944407.xul is being removed because we are changing the
behavior it's trying to test for. Since we now always put the XBL in the same
scope as the page, script is enabled for the XBL if and only if it's enabled for
the page.
dom/base/test/test_bug419527.xhtml, dom/events/test/test_bug391568.xhtml,
dom/xbl/test/test_bug1086996.xhtml are being switched to a chrome test because
otherwise the XBL can't see the getAnonymousNodes method.
All the XBL bits are being removed from test_interfaces because we no longer
have a separate XBL scope to test the behavior of.
js/xpconnect/tests/mochitest/test_nac.xhtml is being removed because XBL no
longer has access to NAC unless the page it's attached to does too, so the test
doesn't really make sense.
layout/xul/test/test_bug1197913.xul is being switched to a chrome test because
its XUL elements use bindings that rely on APIs that are not exposed to normal
web content.
layout/reftests/bugs/495385-2f.xhtml is being removed because I can't think of
a sane way to test that in the new world, short of running the reftest as
chrome. And it doesn't seem worthwhile to look for a way to do that.
dom/xbl/test/test_bug1098628_throw_from_construct.xhtml now needs to
expectUncaughtException(), because the exception is now being thrown in Window
scope.
dom/xbl/test/test_bug1359859.xhtml needs to expectUncaughtException() as needed
and not use XPCNativeWrapper (which it doesn't need to anyway now).
dom/xbl/test/test_bug389322.xhtml, dom/xbl/test/test_bug400705.xhtml,
dom/xbl/test/test_bug401907.xhtml, dom/xbl/test/test_bug403162.xhtml,
dom/xbl/test/test_bug526178.xhtml, dom/xbl/test/test_bug639338.xhtml don't need
to use XPCNativeWrapper anymore.
dom/xbl/test/test_bug821850.html is being removed because it exists only to test XBL scopes.
dom/xbl/test/file_bug950909.xml is being changed to work without a separate XBL
scope (though whether the test still makes sense at that point is a bit questionable).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D19260
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
I am not a huge fan of the UnwrapReflectorToISupports setup here. Maybe we
should introduce two differently-named methods that make it somewhat clear what
the limitations of not taking a JSContext are? I couldn't think of sane
naming...
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D17885
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
