There are a number of failures, for which I've filed separate bugs.
And then a lot of fuzziness. I manually inspected the reftest analyzer
results on try pushes to distinguish failures vs fuzziness.
Depends on D34537
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D34538
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This patch removes the dom.webcomponents.shadowdom.enabled pref and all its
references, including the following functions:
* nsContentUtils::IsShadowDOMEnabled()
* nsIDocument::IsShadowDOMEnabled()
* nsDocument::IsShadowDOMEnabled(JSContext* aCx, JSObject* aGlobal)
* nsDocument::IsShadowDOMEnabled(const nsINode* aNode)
* nsTextNode::IsShadowDOMEnabled(JSContext* aCx, JSObject* aObject)
This function is renamed and updated to nsDocument::IsCallerChromeOrAddon():
* nsDocument::IsShadowDOMEnabledAndCallerIsChromeOrAddon(JSContext* aCx, JSObject* aObject)
I didn't change the tests that load Shadow DOM tests in an iframe, in the interest of keeping hg annotation history.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D11183
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This patch removes the dom.webcomponents.shadowdom.enabled pref and all its
references, including the following functions:
* nsContentUtils::IsShadowDOMEnabled()
* nsIDocument::IsShadowDOMEnabled()
* nsDocument::IsShadowDOMEnabled(JSContext* aCx, JSObject* aGlobal)
* nsDocument::IsShadowDOMEnabled(const nsINode* aNode)
* nsTextNode::IsShadowDOMEnabled(JSContext* aCx, JSObject* aObject)
This function is renamed and updated to nsDocument::IsCallerChromeOrAddon():
* nsDocument::IsShadowDOMEnabledAndCallerIsChromeOrAddon(JSContext* aCx, JSObject* aObject)
I didn't change the tests that load Shadow DOM tests in an iframe, in the interest of keeping hg annotation history.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D11183
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
To avoid trimming pixels at the top / left.
This makes it closer to non-WR[1], and fixes both the checkboxes getting
cut off and the master password field.
[1]: non-WR at least at 124 scaling on a hiDPI display is still perfect, though I saw nin symmetric borders at other resolutions, so we might be able to improve here further.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D7251
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This patch was written entirely by the following script:
#!/bin/bash
if [ ! -d "./.hg" ]
then
echo "Not in a source tree." 1>&2
exit 1
fi
find . -regex '.*\(ref\|crash\)test.*\.list' | while read FILENAME
do
echo "Processing ${FILENAME}."
# The following has four substitutions:
# * The first one replaces the *first* argument to fuzzy() when it doesn't
# have a - in it, by replacing it with an explicit 0-N range.
# * The second one does the same for the *second* argument to fuzzy().
# * The third does the same for the *second* argument to fuzzy-if().
# * The fourth does the same for the *third* argument to fuzzy-if().
#
# Note that this is using perl rather than sed because perl doesn't
# support non-greedy matching, which is needed for the first argument to
# fuzzy-if.
perl -pi -e 's/(fuzzy\()([^ ,()-]*)(,[^ ,()]*\))/${1}0-${2}${3}/g;s/(fuzzy\([^ ,()]*,)([^ ,()-]*)(\))/${1}0-${2}${3}/g;s/(fuzzy-if\([^ ]*?,)([^ ,()-]*)(,[^ ,()]*\))/${1}0-${2}${3}/g;s/(fuzzy-if\([^ ]*?,[^ ,()]*,)([^ ,()-]*)(\))/${1}0-${2}${3}/g' "${FILENAME}"
done
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2974
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This covers all the reftests that have lower fuzz (or zero fuzz) and
were producing an UNEXPECTED-PASS result with webrender on windows. In
many cases I just adjusted the lower bound of the existing webrender
fuzz. In other cases existing fails-if conditions had to be tweaked to
exclude webrender.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 49LvS0vuYWR
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : d194e24affb87fe4560a127ff4016f9c38f414fd
Many of these could probably be fuzzed but in the interests of getting
the reftest suite turned on sooner I'm doing a blanket fails-if. This
covers all the reftests where there is more fuzz with webrender on
windows than any of existing annotations account for. In some cases the
fuzz is only a few pixels more than the equivalent Linux fuzz already
annotated, but I'll clean that up in a future bug.
MozReview-Commit-ID: IaKarbnL46d
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 71889340305b0b12fa8eace722e42bb3faf14419
This is enough to get the stylo-enabled build green.
There's still some orange in WPT with stylo disabled (due to interfaces not
exposed and that) that I'll update tomorrow.
Will send a different patch on top of this for that, though I'll land together.
MozReview-Commit-ID: CsN5CM93RUz
Most of the Shadow DOM related code are behind "dom.webcomponents.enabled" and
this pref is only used by Shadow DOM right now, so we should rename it to
"dom.webcomponents.shadowdom.enabled"
MozReview-Commit-ID: er1c7AsSSW
The prior epsilon (2px) seems like an arbitrarily chosen value, which must have
been large enough to allow for small sizing differences on our continuous
integration platforms. But it's not quite large enough to handle sizing
differences on my local linux machine (I'm guessing due to font differences).
Note that this doesn't reduce the sensitivity of the test. In the test's
anticipated failure mode (when font inflation fails to apply on some element),
the sizing differences are an order of magnitude larger than this amended
epsilon.
MozReview-Commit-ID: Iz7jqRvFh8w
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 573e42c3237b11d6747ed45bc3ae3d86aeb0a4b3
This patch:
- adds fails-if annotations for all the reftests that were consistently failing
with layers-free turned on.
- removes fails-if or reduces the range on fuzzy-if annotations for all
the reftests that were producing UNEXPECTED-PASS results with
layers-free turned on.
- adds skip-if, random-if, or fuzzy-if annotations to the reftests that
were intermittently failing due to timeout, obvious incorrectness, or
slight pixel differences, respectively.
MozReview-Commit-ID: A0Aknn6rnjj
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 420d9cf43f23a5d654fa36eec69138937d13c173
Skip tests that are expected to fail in both Stylo and Gecko modes. They would unexpectedly "pass" in styloVsGecko mode when comparing the two failures, which is not a useful result.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 3mOpjU225Q1
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 22bb5d4e3c5138ef832995eaf5716824f4707ffe
extra : source : d40fb20c9a49d0797c0eeae613a04912b12a28f7
Skip tests that are expected to fail in both Stylo and Gecko modes. They would unexpectedly "pass" in styloVsGecko mode when comparing the two failures, which is not a useful result.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 3mOpjU225Q1
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 0c307639c3626af3b6b43e05d3ee73d08b3f47ce
Using namespace id fixes this issue because in Gecko, the pref of MathML
(as well as SVG) works in the way that we choose a different namespace
id (the disabled id) for the elements. Those ids are mapped to the same
namespace atom as normal ids, which means if we use the atom, we would
treat the elements like normal mathml elements.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 9YBBokbP04M
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 397f09db41a22bfa34e4abe26ad10027dab83d0d
