Since MOZ_NATIVE_DEVICES builds against play-services-{basement,base,cast},
some ad-hoc de-duplication is necessary.
--HG--
extra : commitid : 2jNIgZpLUq2
extra : source : 0957d3435ac22765d7868cb3c7db1e0787836bc3
The code generator uses == and != to compare two instances of Class, but
it really should be using equals because two distinct instances of Class
can refer to the same class type.
Java allows a class field to have the same name as a superclass field,
but when we generate bindings for them, they'll end up with the same C++
name and cause an error. This patch makes the SDK processor filter out
any superclass fields that are hidden by a subclass field with the same
name.
Note that we are still leaking some of these, likely due to
CompositorChild and ImageBridgeChild leaking, but they are not
detected by LSan because they are reachable from the stack.
The configure option has explicitly thrown an error for more than a year now,
and it happens that the remaining way to still forcefully use it has been
broken for more than 8 months.
We try to generate a C++ constant for static final fields, but that
was failing for inaccessible fields. Now we set the field to be
accessible so that we do end up generating a C++ constant.
Right now, when we generate bindings for Java class A, and we encounter
a Java type B, we generate a corresponding C++ name only if A == B,
otherwise we generate a generic "jni::Object" C++ name. For example,
class Foo {
class Bar {
Foo getFoo(Bar bar);
}
}
In C++, Foo.Bar.getFoo would become,
class Foo {
class Bar {
jni::Object::LocalRef getFoo(Bar::Param bar);
};
};
This patch extends the code generator so that any Java class in the
chain of declared classes gets a corresponding C++ name. The above
example now becomes,
class Foo {
class Bar {
Foo::LocalRef getFoo(Bar::Param bar);
};
};
This patch also adds the new base (sic) library play-services-basement.
Note that the package names have changed too:
* play-services-base: com.google.gms -> com.google.gms.base
* play-services-basement: * -> com.google.gms
--HG--
extra : commitid : EcmxZA10rzV
extra : rebase_source : f39b361807a0b8227f3fb9a6d73e066241c8e36c
DONTBUILD because it only changes comments.
This will hopefully prevent confusion like that in bug 1215903.
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : f0a601d77b5f42b4fbe090693234f934e3becc42
Indicating a jar currently looks like the following in a jar manifest:
path/to/name.jar:
The `path/to` doesn't contain the implicit "chrome/" directory. This, in
turn, doesn't allow much flexibility to use the jar maker for what is not
necessarily under chrome/.
To use the jar maker to fill some chrome manifest for the default theme
extension, we currently use a hackish path to get to the right location,
and rely on the chrome.manifest file in the parent directory never to be
picked by the package manifest, which is a quite horrible way to do this,
but worked well enough for that specific use case.
With the need to handle system addons at the build system level, it
becomes necessary to come up with something less hackish.
What this change introduces is an additional syntax for the jar manifest,
in the following form:
[base/path] sub/path/to/name.jar:
Using this syntax, there is no implicit 'chrome' path. The `base/path` is
relative to the current DIST_SUBDIR, and the `sub/path` is relative to that
`base/path`. The distinction can be useful for build system backends.
The assumption that the "root" chrome.manifest is in the parent directory
of the implicit "chrome" directory dies, and the `base/path` is where the
root chrome.manifest is placed.
