This patch adds an extra check for paint suppression when waiting for paint
events. This is because on some platforms (notably B2G) we can think all paints
have completed because paint suppression is in effect and as a result call the
callback too soon.
This patch use window.setTimeout(..., 0) to wait for paint suppression to finish
before preceding to check for pending paint events.
When the refresh driver is under test control, if we detect that paint events
are pending we need to force a refresh driver tick. This patch adds that tick.
I suppose we had previously never hit this situation before and never noticed
this.
This patch also rearranges the main loop so that early returns appear first and
calling the callback appears at the end.
... and a bit of grid-auto-flow, for the grid shorthand.
* Avoid using CheckEndProperty() when possible
* Distinguish between "error" and "not a <track-size>"
* Split out parsing of a <track-list>, given its initial [<line-names>?]
When we have a backwards fill and we sample at *exactly* the start of the
animation on the next refresh driver tick, when we get to
RestyleManager::ComputeStyleChangeFor (or more specifically
ElementRestyler::CaptureChange) we notice that the style hasn't changed (since
the first frame of the animation produces the same value as the backwards fill)
and end up with an empty change list. As a result we never schedule a view
manager flush and rebuild the layer. Hence, the animation never gets sent to the
compositor thread. On the next tick we're already throttling the main thread.
This patch fixes this by applying the same approach as is used for transitions,
that is, explicitly marking which animations are running on the compositor
thread so we know if we need to trigger a layer transaction or not. This should
not only be more robust than the previous code but also facilitate aligning
animations and transitions code (bug 880596).
This test reproduces a bug where we don't send an animation to the compositor
thread. The important step is the sample precisely at the start of the animation
interval.
Adds a test for transform animations with a delay where there is already
a transform specified on the element.
This test used to fail but bug 828173 fixed it. It is included here as
a regression test.
(Prior to bug 828173 we were able to fix this by triggering
ForceLayerRerendering inside nsAnimationManager::nsFlushAnimations whenever we
detected *different* style rules but canThrottleTick=true)
The issue stemmed from the fact that when an element has a transform property,
LayerIsPrerenderedDataKey would get set on the layer because in
nsDisplayTransform::ShouldPrerenderTransformedContent we would only check for
the *presence* of an animation, not whether it is running. Then in
RestyleManager::DoApplyRenderingChangeToTree we wouldn't do an invalidating
paint because TryUpdateTransformOnly() returns true since it looks at
LayerIsPrerenderedDataKey.
Bug 828173 fixes this, at least in part, by checking if an animation is running.
This bug may resurface if we put animations with a delay on the compositor
thread hence it is worth including here.
Animations with a delay are not put on the compositor thread until the end of
the delay phase. However, there is currently nothing that explicitly triggers
this transaction. It may occur due to flushes that arise from UI events but it
is not guaranteed.
This patch detects the end of a delay phase and turns off throttling for that
sample. It re-uses the mLastNotification member which is not ideal but
a subsequent patch in this queue removes this and replaces it with the approach
used for transitions.
