I'm taking the opportunity to remove isDefaultHandlerApp messaging as the
content-side calls were removed in bug 1353029.
Depends on D59788
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D59789
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
I'm taking the opportunity to remove isDefaultHandlerApp messaging as the
content-side calls were removed in bug 1353029.
Depends on D59788
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D59789
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This patch was generated with a script. It doesn't include all files:
- Files that use the preprocessor or fail to parse are skipped
- Files that are loaded as JSMs but don't use the .jsm extension are skipped (those will be renamed in Bug 1609269)
It was generated with the following command using d855222aa2/no-this-property-read.js:
```
hg revert --all &&
cp .gitignore .rgignore &&
rg --files-without-match -g '*.jsm' '^#endif|^#include|^#filter' | jscodeshift --stdin --transform ~/Code/jsm-rewrites/no-this-property-read.js --ignore-pattern ./mobile/android/modules/Sanitizer.jsm --ignore-pattern ./js/xpconnect/tests/unit/syntax_error.jsm &&
./mach eslint `hg st | rg '^M ' | sed 's/^M //'`
```
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D60187
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Screenshots is now part of the browser first-run experience so get rid of
the onboarding slides embedded in screenshots. This means fewer strings
that need to be ported to fluent.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58815
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Screenshots is now part of the browser first-run experience so get rid of
the onboarding slides embedded in screenshots. This means fewer strings
that need to be ported to fluent.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58815
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This patch does the following:
1. Add a WindowGlobalChild IPC method - GetContentBlockingEvents. Documents can use the method
retrieve content blocking events stored in the parent process.
2. Update nsIDocShell::GetHasTrackingContentBlocked to return a promise.
3. Replace API in report-site-issue to use the promise-based GetHasTrackingContentBlocked API
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D56204
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
`AutoEditActionDataSetter` is created in the stack when editor's public method
is called and that guarantees lifetime of global objects in editor such as
editor itself, selection controller, etc.
The dispatcher of `beforeinput` event returns `NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED`
if an event is actually dispatched but canceled. The reason why it's an error
is, editor code must stop handling anything when any methods return error.
So, returning an error code is reasonable in editor module. But when it's
filtered by `EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult()` at return statement of public
methods, it's converted to `NS_SUCCESS_DOM_NO_OPERATION`. This avoids throwing
new exception, but editor class users in C++ can distinguish whether each edit
action is canceled or handled. The reason why we should not throw new
exception from XPCOM API is, without taking care of each caller may break some
our UI (especially for avoiding to break comm-central). Therefore, this patch
does not make XPCOM methods return error code when `beforeinput` event is
canceled.
In most cases, immediately after creating `AutoEditActionDataSetter` is good
timing to dispatch `beforeinput` event since editor has not touched the DOM
yet. If `beforeinput` requires `data` or `dataTransfer`, methods need to
dispatch `beforeinput` event after that. Alhtough this is not a good thing
from point of view of consistency of the code. However, I have no better
idea.
Note 1: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order
between `keypress` and `beforeinput` (dispatching `beforeinput` event after
`keypress` event). However, we follow all other browsers' behavior so that it
must be safe and the spec should be updated for backward compatibility.
Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/220
Note 2: Our implementation does NOT conform to the spec about event order
between `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`. Our behavior is same as
Safari, but different from Chrome. This might cause web-compat issues.
However, our behavior does make sense from point of view of consistency of
event spec. Additionally, at both `compositionupdate` and `beforeinput`,
composition string in editor has not been modified yet. Therefore, this
may not cause web-compat issues (and I hope so).
Spec issue: https://github.com/w3c/input-events/issues/49
Note that this patch makes editor detect bugs that `beforeinput` event hasn't
been handled yet when it dispatches `input` event or modifying `data` and
`dataTransfer` value are modified after dispatching `beforeinput` event with
`MOZ_ASSERT`s.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D58127
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
