This patch splits FontTableURI and BlobURL in 2 classes:
FontTableURIProtocolHandler and BlobURLProtocolHandler
both under mozilla::dom.
It also removes a memory reporter because that report is already covered by the
BlobURL one.
--HG--
rename : dom/file/nsHostObjectProtocolHandler.cpp => dom/file/BlobURLProtocolHandler.cpp
rename : dom/file/nsHostObjectProtocolHandler.h => dom/file/BlobURLProtocolHandler.h
This was done automatically replacing:
s/mozilla::Move/std::move/
s/ Move(/ std::move(/
s/(Move(/(std::move(/
Removing the 'using mozilla::Move;' lines.
And then with a few manual fixups, see the bug for the split series..
MozReview-Commit-ID: Jxze3adipUh
In order to have useful Wayland builds we need ability to switch
between GL backends run-time - to use EGL backend for Wayland and GLX backend for X11.
GL_PROVIDER_GLX is used exclusively for GLX GL backend, so let's replace GL_PROVIDER_GLX
build-time check by more general MOZ_X11 check which determines X11 dependent code
and it's valid for both X11 and Wayland builds.
MozReview-Commit-ID: HYobrHveoaP
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 2d359355ee747f5898d27d8a28d66114f4135f5b
It has greatly regressed with recent AMD drivers, providing worse performance than the software decoder under most circumstances.
MozReview-Commit-ID: Jtabi1qhoYF
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 555e3bfdad18753079ccdcdd10261d68bbdaaad1
Any more specific work that is happening in these methods will have its own
specific category labeling in that specific code. The instances touched in this
patch are more on the outside and don't really know what kind of code is going
to be running inside.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 47NO1DZzkdH
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 344c380ddaaf42a1fd820a26b762c61ee9e2d524
Any more specific work that is happening in these methods will have its own
specific category labeling in that specific code. The instances touched in this
patch are more on the outside and don't really know what kind of code is going
to be running inside.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 47NO1DZzkdH
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : f807c14bf6a592e0c651e15b63d1e7d63e4b0159
Any more specific work that is happening in these methods will have its own
specific category labeling in that specific code. The instances touched in this
patch are more on the outside and don't really know what kind of code is going
to be running inside.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 47NO1DZzkdH
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 35362bc94068103367f46b23a14cb3831cd86990
The ceiling was introduced in bug 549190 for improve the consistency of
underline positioning. However, removing ceiling now doesn't seem to
regress the testcases in that bug, probably thanks to improvement in
other part.
The ceiling here causes us to have different font metrics than other
browsers on Windows, and can lead to webcompat issue. We also don't do
this for other backends. So it's probably better removing it in favor
of rounding.
There are several test changes:
* min-intrinsic-with-percents-across-elements.html changes result due to
height of wrapping div in reference page depends on line height, so a
fixed line height is set to work around the issue.
* 368020-1.html changes result because a slightly different line-height
triggers bug 1462514. It is changed to use fixed line-height to work
around the issue.
* 456147.xul is disabled because it compares XUL against HTML page, but
XUL has different approach to position text in its elements than HTML.
Specifically, XUL elements don't seem to respect line height while
HTML elements do. The original line height in the file was probably
chosen to make the HTML match XUL, so it seems to be non-trivial to
fix it in a platform-independent way.
* sizing-orthog-{vlr,vrl}-in-htb-{008,020}.xht fails due to text in <p>
after the testing block shifts 1px up for unknown reason.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2WJG1AigWl1
--HG--
extra : source : 653c6b7480997c4e1dbead5f0441bc06a0605b7a
The ceiling was introduced in bug 549190 for improve the consistency of
underline positioning. However, removing ceiling now doesn't seem to
regress the testcases in that bug, probably thanks to improvement in
other part.
The ceiling here causes us to have different font metrics than other
browsers on Windows, and can lead to webcompat issue. We also don't do
this for other backends. So it's probably better removing it in favor
of rounding.
There are several test changes:
* min-intrinsic-with-percents-across-elements.html changes result due to
height of wrapping div in reference page depends on line height, so a
fixed line height is set to work around the issue.
* 368020-1.html changes result because a slightly different line-height
triggers bug 1462514. It is changed to use fixed line-height to work
around the issue.
* 456147.xul is disabled because it compares XUL against HTML page, but
XUL has different approach to position text in its elements than HTML.
Specifically, XUL elements don't seem to respect line height while
HTML elements do. The original line height in the file was probably
chosen to make the HTML match XUL, so it seems to be non-trivial to
fix it in a platform-independent way.
* sizing-orthog-{vlr,vrl}-in-htb-{008,020}.xht fails due to text in <p>
after the testing block shifts 1px up for unknown reason.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2WJG1AigWl1
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 540e68ffff618a6dc3c14b3702b2c042988061a3
The ceiling was introduced in bug 549190 for improve the consistency of
underline positioning. However, removing ceiling now doesn't seem to
regress the testcases in that bug, probably thanks to improvement in
other part.
The ceiling here causes us to have different font metrics than other
browsers on Windows, and can lead to webcompat issue. We also don't do
this for other backends. So it's probably better removing it in favor
of rounding.
There are several test changes:
* min-intrinsic-with-percents-across-elements.html changes result due to
height of wrapping div in reference page depends on line height, so a
fixed line height is set to work around the issue.
* 368020-1.html changes result because a slightly different line-height
triggers bug 1462514. It is changed to use fixed line-height to work
around the issue.
* 456147.xul is disabled because it compares XUL against HTML page, but
XUL has different approach to position text in its elements than HTML.
Specifically, XUL elements don't seem to respect line height while
HTML elements do. The original line height in the file was probably
chosen to make the HTML match XUL, so it seems to be non-trivial to
fix it in a platform-independent way.
* sizing-orthog-{vlr,vrl}-in-htb-{008,020}.xht fails due to text in <p>
after the testing block shifts 1px up for unknown reason.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2WJG1AigWl1
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 6c61fa95a3b01e7b439be46a2498b4f893d8b84b
