After this change, we have ShallowSizeOf{In,Ex}cludingThis(), which don't do
anything to measure children. (They can be combined with iteration to measure
children.)
And we still have the existing single-arg SizeOf{In,Ex}cluding() functions,
which work if the entry type itself defines SizeOfExcludingThis().
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : f93de9b789c21b1b148bed9de795f663f77c9dd9
After this change, we have PLDHashTable::ShallowSizeOf{In,Ex}cludingThis(),
which don't do anything to measure children. (They can be combined with
iteration to measure children.)
This patch also removes the PL_DHashTableSizeOf{In,Ex}cludingThis() functions.
They're not necessary because the methods can be used instead.
Finally, the patch deliberately converts some SizeOfExcludingThis() calls to
SizeOfIncludingThis(). These are all done on heap pointers so this change is
valid.
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : b1d51096a8e7dcac29d7efd92e28938836ff5481
This is a particularly nice example of how iterators can be so much nicer than
Enumerate()-style functions:
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 757f75b90cb4c624143c236f9743edf158f72d66
nsBaseHashtable has both EnumerateRead() and Enumerate(). A comment claims that
the latter locks the table, but this is false, so I removed the comment. Other
than that the only notable difference between them is that they have slightly
different types for dealing with values (|UserDataType| vs |DataType&|) so I've
implemented both GetUserData() and GetData(), allowing either type to be used.
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 9d61cc8f4c14082c9f1939ff3ced2b697e043f42
The original motivation for the Iterator/RemovingIterator split was that
PLDHashTable Checker class would treat them differently. But that didn't end up
happening (see bug 1131308). So this patch merges them. This is a small code
size win now but it will become bigger when I add iterators to nsTHashTable and
nsBaseHashtable.
The only complication is that PLDHashTable::Iter() is now non-const, which is
a problem if you use it in a const method. So I added PLDHashTable::ConstIter()
which is used in just two places. It's a bit of a hack -- effectively a
const_cast -- but I don't think it's too bad.
This change reimplements nsTHashtable::Clear() using PLDHashable::Clear(). This
changes its semantics slightly -- the old version would clear the table but
leave its capacity unchanged. The new version will adjust the capacity
to the default, though the entry storage will only be re-allocated when the
first new element is added.
|mOps| is always non-null now, and there's no longer any distinction between
and uninitialized and initialized table. Yay.
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 3d1fb72aee4dd21ff20db0ff3166d4e932ade897
The added static_casts will be removed when PLDHashTable and PLDHashTable2 are
merged.
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 49dacef8a86adc088610449b6bd2ef9345af5a84
The SetOps() call is no longer necessary now that PLDHashTable has a move
constructor.
This change originally landed in one of the patches from bug 1161377, which was
subsequently backed out.
Due to Android startup regressions (bug 1163066) and plugin crashes (bug
1165155).
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 380f79e67dff4c4eaa2614f286a4d0669666b652
The destructor is "opt-in" -- there's a flag that makes it a no-op unless the
table was initialized with the initializing constructor. This will allow us to
incrementally convert existing tables from manual to automatic
initialization/finalization. This is important because some of the existing
uses are tricky (impossible?) to convert to the automatic style.
I kept all the existing PL_DHashTableAdd() calls fallible, in order to be
conservative, except for the ones in nsAtomTable.cpp which already were
followed immediately by an abort on failure.
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 526d96ab65e4d7d71197b90d086d19fbdd79b7b5
I kept all the existing PL_DHashTableAdd() calls fallible, in order to be
conservative, except for the ones in nsAtomTable.cpp which already were
followed immediately by an abort on failure.
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : eeba14d732077ef2e412f4caca852de6b6b85f55
It feels safer to use a function with a new name, rather than just changing the
behaviour of the existing function.
For most of these cases the PL_DHashTableLookup() result was checked with
PL_DHASH_ENTRY_IS_{FREE,BUSY} so the conversion was easy. A few of them
preceded that check with a useless null check, but the intent of these was
still easy to determine.
I'll do the trickier ones in subsequent patches.
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : ab37a7a30be563861ded8631771181aacf054fd4
Because (a) this is how it's usually done, (b) it allows static_cast<> instead
of reinterpret_cast<>, and (c) it will make subsequent patches easier.
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 76e67d4b6ec0e5dc898a8214b6a6b562f9e08380
