No one uses syncRealTimeSpell from script even if c-c and BlueGriffon. So
we should devirtualize this
MozReview-Commit-ID: AoOb165dOFa
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : e1a9dcdfa6cfe6c918a06a2738c38a6cb9441a1d
Similar to EditorBase::ReplaceContainerWithTransaction(),
EditorBase::InsertContainerAbove() may set an attribute to newly created element
if it's specified. However, for avoiding the null check, let's make them
as references rather than pointers and treat nsGkAtoms::_empty as nullptr for
making the code safer.
This patch removes "Above" from the method name since it's redundant.
"Insert" sounds like inserting a node, and "Container" means to keep existing
children with new element in EditorBase.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 6EnkKHynYSP
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : d4b4c1a611c46a0f4d86389aab3331af565199d2
This patch renames EditorBase::MoveNode() to
EditorBase::MoveNodeWithTransaction() and redesign its parameters including
replacing a set of container node and offset in it to EditorDOMPointBase.
However, it takes magic number -1 as meaning end of the container.
Therefore, this patch adds MoveNodeToEndWithTransaction() for keeping the
callers simple.
MozReview-Commit-ID: BeTq5c7GQNN
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : b3a617a5a1a493cb0fcbefe2d9a9708b0257b1a8
The parameters of EditorBase::ReplaceContainer() are complicated. For example,
if it's specified as cloning all attributes, aAttribute and aValue are ignored
because CloneAttributes() removes all existing attributes but ReplaceContainer()
sets attributes before calling CloneAttributes(). This method has 3 modes:
1. Just replaces aOldContainer with new element.
2. #1 and clones all attributes from aOldContainer to the new element.
3. #1 and sets aAttribute of the new element to aValue.
Therefore, this patch creates 3 inline wrappers of the renamed method.
MozReview-Commit-ID: IsPu2uZuU8f
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 02a23f48a91e0c9558126552a4c8d4b12c8b76bc
First, EditorBase::DeleteSelection() is never used since
TextEditor::DeleteSelection() overrides it but does not call it. So, this patch
makes EditorBase::DeleteSelection() only returns NS_ERROR_NOT_IMPLEMENTED.
Next, EditorBase::DeleteSelectionImpl() actually removes content for
TextEditor::DeleteSelection(). So, it should be named as
DeleteSelectionWithTransaction(). However, it'll be done in the following
patch. On the other hand, its callers are EditorBase::HandleKeyPressEvent()
and EditorBase::DeleteSelectionAndPrepareToCreateNode(). Fortunately, they
can be moved to TextEditor simply. Therefore this patch moves the methods
to TextEditor for making related methods in a place.
Then, we can make the implementation of nsIEditor::TextEditor() as a non-virtual
method, TextEditor::DeleteSelectionAsAction().
MozReview-Commit-ID: KXFDhW3G9lA
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 15986979279b2cae3b61cda1bf6bf3d9e4987f3f
EditorBase::SplitNodeImpl() is called by SplitNodeTransaction::DoTransaction()
for actually splitting a node. However, "WithoutTransaction" postfix is really
redundant. Perhaps, just naming DoSplitNode() is better since "Impl" isn't
unclear and not useful if somebody wants to use it as a utility method and
there has already been EditorBase::SplitNode() which is an override of
nsIEditor::SplitNode(). It must not be good to use same name for different
purpose (EditorBase::SplitNode() creates a transaction).
MozReview-Commit-ID: Akjeyp52vVv
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : dcb29cec2749431b59068b670b68e5cd61b18588
This patch renames:
EditorBase::SplitNode() -> EditorBase::SplitNodeWithTransaction()
EditorBase::SplitNodeDeep() -> EditorBase::SplitNodeDeepWithTransaction()
HTMLEditRules::MaybeSplitAncestorsForInsert() ->
HTMLEditRules::MaybeSplitAncestorsForInsertWithTransaction()
Note it might be that some callers of those methods should be renamed too.
However, we should do it in follow up bug after landing those patches since
we can investigate it with searchfox.org after landing patches.
MozReview-Commit-ID: FfxCfaI85z5
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 143960de45791c72dbf4d436f65e55452b4f7b10
EditorBase::CreateNode() creates an element node with transaction. I.e., it's
undoable. So, if somebody would use this method as a helper method for changing
the DOM tree, that would cause unexpected undoable transaction. So, we should
make the method name clearer to avoid such bug.
MozReview-Commit-ID: GZsOGBfqog
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 8b7539a680ee88f3557acb0837fe1a021d842323
So, this patch replaces the setter with non-virtual method and removing the
getter since where is already non-virtual getter method.
MozReview-Commit-ID: Is19Yriz8t8
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : bb2f49f380ddb2e2f96e8690effd8d47d24ae0ae
It is unnecessary to get PresShell for nsStyleText, so we can return bool
instead of nsresult and can change it to static method.
MozReview-Commit-ID: LGrdcaJuLO
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : bb6b6d990741c7b478e9699ae84cc6b89a765bf7
Bug 768765 isn't enough for fix. Since Selection::GetAnchorFocusRange can
return nullptr, we should consider this condition.
And I cannot reproduce this using crash test, so I add mochitest for this.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 8Ei5YBIBuWv
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : cd11517f73179d949479716a83baec0e1f492eca
This method is not a virtual call, and also looks nicer.
This patch was mostly generated by a Python script, but I manually
cleaned up the code in a few places where statements didn't need to be
split across multiple lines any more.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 8JExxqSRc59
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : df6330a89e8d65dfe7a6fda0c8cb9f9732302efc
To reduce QI, I would like to replace nsIDOMNode with nsINode. And some
parameters in *DataTransder.cpp's methods is unused (it uses as nullptr),
so we should remove these parameters.
Also nsIDOMNodeList is unused now, so we should remove this including.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 1QTIkxDazjJ
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 3961e897fcaa96975facc822821f1e223cab358d
nsIEditor.numberOfUndoItems and nsIEditor.numberOfRedoItems are shortcut
property for nsITransactionManager.numberOfUndoItems and
nsITransactionManager.numberOfRedoItems of the editor. However, anybody
uses nsITransactionManager directly. So, we can get rid of them.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 70J0bsxDNCC
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : fd0847687fe595b257b0256a5f1faa5f2df5f972
nsITransactionListener::AddListener() and
nsITransactionListener::RemoveListener() are of course virtual methods.
Additionally, they are safe to call without grabbing the TransactionManager's
instance with local variable. Therefore, if EditorBase has methods to
add/remove transaction listener to/from its transaction manager, we don't
need EditorBase::GetTransactionManager() anymore.
So, this patch adds AddTransactionListener() and RemoveTransactionListener() to
EditorBase and TransactionManager, and remove
EditorBase::GetTransactionManager() (not nsIEditor's one).
MozReview-Commit-ID: FkPa1YgfagD
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 8ef7796136804e3d7604c5ca5417fb3379606b93
nsIEditor::EnableUndo() and nsITransactionManager::Clear(),
nsITransactionManager::SetMaxTransactionCount() are called a lot but they are
virtual and some of or all of them are called once. There should be each
non-virtual method to do what each root caller wants. Therefore, this patch
adds EditorBase::EnableUndoRedo(), EditorBase::DisableUndoRedo(),
EditorBase::ClearUndoRedo(), TransactionManager::EnableUndoRedo(),
TransactionManager::DisableUndoRedo() and TransactionManager::ClearUndoRedo().
Note that this patch makes TransactionManager won't clear mUndoStack nor
mRedoStack if mDoStack is not empty. This is checked only by
TransactionManager::SetMaxTransactionCount() but according to the comment,
TransactionManager::Clear(), TransactionManager::UndoStack() and
TransactionManager::RedoStack() should check it too.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 6qBZOQNwdhw
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 3249137f7acca0b4698713ab732774140bcc27e8
EditorBase::Undo() and EditorBase::Redo() implement only undo/redo function.
TextEditor::Undo() and TextEditor::Redo() call them with calling some
notification methods. However, this causes redundant AutoRules instance
creation and doesn't make sense to separate them under current design.
Therefore this patch merges them into TextEditor. Unfortunately, they are
XPCOM methods but we cannot implement proper overloads of non-virtual since
they are already minimized design. Fortunately, reducing only one virtual
call per undo/redo isn't so effective. So, let's keep simpler design.
Additionally, this patch makes them stop committing composition because
Chrome does not commit composition even if "undo"/"redo" is requested with
execCommand() during composition and it doesn't make sense to try to
undo/redo after committing composition since first undoable transaction
becomes the committing composition and committing composition causes
removing all transactions from redo transaction queue.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 78qlV2I9Lzk
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 545c787d47fe02bf7e085be9d3ae028816750e69
Now, both TransactionManager.h and TransactionStack.h are exposed. So,
TransactionManager::GetNumberOfUndoItems() and
TransactionManager::GetNumberOfRedoItems() can be rewritten with non-virtual
inline methods because they just return mUndoStack.GetSize() and
mRedoStack.GetSize(). Then, we can implement EditorBase::NumbeOfUndoItems(),
EditorBase::NumberOfRedoItems(), EditorBase::CanUndo() and
EditorBase::CanRedo() as inline methods.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 3CJd0VrlvFY
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 6848d80a395f1c161e10bfb50d15bd63de288095
A lot of methods take |const EditorRawDOMPoint&| as their argument. However,
some of them are called with EditorDOMPoint::AsRaw(). This is not good for
performance because:
1. Needs to create temporary instance of EditorRawDOMPoint.
2. EditorRawDOMPoint::AsRaw() may be used by simple mistake.
3. Such methods may call EditorRawDOMPoint::Offset(), however, it's not copied
to the original EditorDOMPoint instance. So, callers may need to compute
offset again.
So, such methods should be changed to template methods if they are not virtual
method and AsRaw() should be gotten rid of for prevent it looking not expensive.
MozReview-Commit-ID: DAqqW4a2EMS
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 120b920477fe6e7231271411a00994325acdb842
EditorBase::GetStartNodeAndOffset() and EditorBase::GetEndNodeAndOffset() are
just wrappers of EditorBase::GetStartPoint() and EditorBase::GetEndPoint().
They may *compute* offset in the container node even if some callers don't
need the offset. Therefore, we should get rid of them and make all callers
use EditorBase::GetStartPoint() or EditorBase::GetEndPoint() directly.
Note that EditorBase::GetStartNodeAndOffset() and
EditorBase::GetEndNodeAndOffset() returns NS_ERROR_FAILURE if
EditorBase::GetStartPoint() or EditorBase::GetEndPoint() returns not set point.
Therefore, checking the result is set equals checking the old nsresult as
an error.
MozReview-Commit-ID: JLwqRMFLjHC
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 0eb6bf4ba80e8139c6b9f36723d77d23f2b9099e
It is unnecessary to use already_AddRefed for GetDocument and GetPresShell.
Then, if we remove already_AddRefed, we can replace this with const method.
MozReview-Commit-ID: KTVS0rYrY2i
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 0199026410fc674f112c960b599a09bc7906cf85
Currently, HTMLEditor doesn't initialize caret position when it gets focus by
itself in most cases. Only when it's in designMode, it may move caret to the
first visible (not checking CSS actually).
In most cases, caret position is adjusted when EditorBase::InitializeSelection()
calls Selection::SetAncestorLimiter(). If selected range is outside of
new limiter, it moves caret to start of the new limiter. However, this is
really different behavior from the other browsers. The other browsers try
to move caret to the first editable text node or before the first editable
content such as <img>, <input>, etc.
This difference causes a serious incompatible issue with Draft.js. It doesn't
initialize caret position when it gets focus but it assumes that caret is
always set to before <br> element if there is no other content.
So, let's try to behave as what other browsers do as far as possible.
This patch makes editor behave as:
* if selection is already in the editing host except start of the editing host,
does nothing.
* if there is non-editable element before any editable node, move caret to
start of the editing host.
* if there is editable text node or element node which cannot have a text node,
move its start or before it.
* if there is no editable nodes which can contain text nodes, move caret to
start of the editing host.
Note that before applying this patch, in designMode, BeginningOfDocument() used
document element instead of <body> element. Therefore, it may set odd position
if <head> element has some text nodes with <script> or <style>. However,
this doesn't make sense and for making more consistent behavior between
designMode and contenteditable, this patch makes it use editing host (it's
<body> element if it's in designMode).
MozReview-Commit-ID: 5neYoTMq6Cc
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : c4d06b6864a221d7cd2833a007d73f7d67821e95
Everyone calls them with the shell of the current composed document, and this
allows the multi-presShell stuff to just be in UpdateCurrentStyleSources /
DoGetStyleContextNoFlush.
The only reason we need to use OwnerDoc()->GetShell() instead of the composed
doc in GetStyleContext / GetStyleContextNoFlush is Element::GetBindingURL, which
does expect to get the binding URL for stuff outside of the composed doc (and
changing that gave me a useless browser).
That's technically a behavior change on the cases that used to pass nullptr, but
I think all callers are fine with that. I could also just add a special function
for that particular case, it may be worth it.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2XlnkgdgDCK
HTMLEditRules::WillInsertBreak() started to use HTMLEditRules::MakeBasicBlock()
to wrap existing inline elements with default paragraph separator if inline
elements are children of editing host. However,
HTMLEditRules::ApplyBlockStyle() called by HTMLEditRules::MakeBasicBlock() sets
mNewNode to last new block node. So, if it wraps inline elements after caret
position, mNewNode becomes after expected caret position and
HTMLEditRules::AfterEditInner() will move caret into it.
This patch make HTMLEditRules::WillInsertBreak() reset mNewNode with
caret position after calling HTMLEditRules::MakeBasicBlock().
Additionally, this patch fixes a bug of HTMLEditor::IsVisibleBRElement().
That is, it uses only editable nodes to check if given <br> element is
visible. However, editable state is not related to this check. If <br>
element is followed by non-editable inline node (except invisible data
nodes), it always visible. This bug caused getting wrong nodes with
HTMLEditRules::GetNodesFromSelection() which is used by
HTMLEditRules::MakeBasicBlock(). Therefore, this patch also adds lots of
EditorBase::Get(Next|Previous)ElementOrText*() and
HTMLEditor::Get(Next|Previous)HTMLElementOrText*() to ignore only invisible
data nodes.
Note that even with this fix, the range of nodes computed by
HTMLEditRules::GetNodesFromSelection() is still odd if only non-editable
elements follow a <br> node which is first <br> element after the caret
position. However, what is expected by the execCommand spec is unclear.
So, automated test added by this patch checks current inconsistent behavior
for now.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2m52StwoEEH
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 6b9b2338e35c4d2e89a405fd8e1ffc7b0873ca1e
EditorBase::JoinNodeDeep() returns a DOM point which was start of right node.
Currently, this is set before actually joining the nodes. Therefore, we see
warnings since right node which becomes joined node may have less children
than left node.
This patch also makes the NS_WARNING_ASSERTION to NS_ASSERTION since no tests
hit this. So, we can use it to detect regressions.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 3RmRP588AkF
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 2cab458ffac566c81eb8d3f47e755ffacb1553d2
Since We can use EditorBase/TextEditor/HTMLEditor directly, we can
movei noscript methods in nsIEditor to each class.
Also, Init is unnecessary to use nsIDOMDocument and nsIContent since method
isn't in IDL. And some methods are unused now.
MozReview-Commit-ID: D3B6oSlcT0L
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 6cab2e6e7b4ba8cfb56d8320be24ca4afcbe55fb
extra : amend_source : 1d8c59086a9158a49dd270b64ecf8341ed4002ce
Before bug 1425091, we called RangeUpdater::SelAdjCreateNode() with point of
new node in EditorBase::CreateElement(). However, it was accidentally changed
to point *in* new element. Therefore, setting such DOM point causes warnings
in debug build and call of RangeUpdater::SelAdjCreateNode() must be failed
since the point stores wrong container node.
Additionally, this patch stops using another EditorRawDOMPoint instance which
is just redundant and renames |ret| to |newElement| for making its meaning
clearer.
MozReview-Commit-ID: Gc0YgaNLYcx
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : c2fbe2669ca8a5993e26b357f53dc38341fd6bf6
Since We can use EditorBase/TextEditor/HTMLEditor directly, we can
movei noscript methods in nsIEditor to each class.
Also, Init is unnecessary to use nsIDOMDocument and nsIContent since method
isn't in IDL. And some methods are unused now.
MozReview-Commit-ID: D3B6oSlcT0L
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : b89698f4ab56fdd97a4cd8c515a8b33f6a74a7af
I left some IgnoredErrorResults for now where people warn on failure. We could
consider adding a WarnOnError() thing or something.
MozReview-Commit-ID: L5ttZ9CGKg0
This patch makes EditorBase derived from nsISelectionListener. Then, we can
make IMEContentObserver, TextInputListener, ComposerCommandsUpdater,
TypeInState not derived from nsISelectionListener since EditorBase or
HTMLEditor can notify them of selection change directly. Additionally,
ResizerSelectionListener is not necessary anymore since it just implements
nsISelectionListener and calls only a method of HTMLEditor. So, HTMLEditor
can call it directly.
Note that the order of selection listeners may be different. However,
according to what each selection listener does, changing the order isn't
problem.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 1JXZxQcS0tP
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : c2ebe622a74001ad4e421da492dcdab8e6fe1649
Now, nobody implements nsIEditorObserver::BeforeEditAction() and
nsIEditorObserver::CancelEditAction(). So, we can remove them.
MozReview-Commit-ID: DYppLayC5oT
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 196e042234c65a43947a1aa90898901389a3a53b
Similar to TextInputListener, EditorBase should store IMEContentObserver
directly instead of via nsIEditorObserver. Then,
EditorBase::NotifyEditorObservers() can call each method directly.
Additionally, we can make IMEContentObserver not derived from nsIEditorObserver.
MozReview-Commit-ID: cNKWJe5eUC
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 4ed3b3b3180b8ee4a7c514ce1f89eba4dad64fbe
Now, EditorBase can store TextInputListener directly instead of as
nsIEditorObserver. And then, EditorBase can call its EditAction() method
directly. Therefore, we can make TextInputListener not derived from
nsIEditorObserver.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 4qPnnvReLKy
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : cde47e245c9856abf696dbaf8e26d8e4d6d98d42
mozInlineSpellChecker listens to only DidSplitNode() and DidJoinNodes().
So, EditorBase should call them directly rather than treating it as an
nsIEditActionListener since its runtime cost becomes really cheaper.
Different from EditorSpellCheck, nobody creates instance of
nsIInlineSpellChecker. So, we can now stop supporting createInstance() for it
in chrome JS and should do this since EditorBase cannot support multiple
mozInlineSpellChecker instances without nsIEditActionListener interface.
Therefore, this patch removes the entry from factory.
MozReview-Commit-ID: W1CLdsJaaB
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 2319999e4b1fc8978386c49236d5d24d78d86047
Currently, first edit action listener is always TextServicesDocument for
EditorBase::mInlineSpellChecker if spell check is enabled and it requires
only DidDeleteNode() and DidJoinNodes(). So, in most cases, EditorBase
should call only them to avoid running redundant for loops for
nsIEditActionListener methods.
This patch makes that EditorBase::AddEditActionListener() and
RemoveEditActionListener() check whether coming nsIEditActionListener is
TextServicesDocument for mInlineSpellChecker. If so, EditorBase should
store it as reference to TextServicesDocument. And when edit action occurs,
its DidDeleteNode() and DidJoinNodes() should be called directly.
Unfortunately, this patch makes TextServiceDocument's maintaining rules
complicated. However, it must be really rare case to add new edit action
listener because it's really old component.
Note that EditorSpellCheck may be created multiple instances for an editor
from chrome JS. Therefore, we need to keep TextServicesDocument being
derived from nsIEditActionListener because in such case, TextServicesDocument
for other EditorSpellCheck instances should be supported via
nsIEditActionListener even though such case makes EditorBase slower.
MozReview-Commit-ID: KtlXsBCOzKL
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 6827ed09a028f2049fd7afba2f5116d092bd14e5
EditorBase::mInlineSpellChecker is always an instance of mozInlineSpellChecker.
Fortunately, it's easy to expose mozInlineSpellChecker.h. So, making EditorBase
store it as mozInlineSpellChecker directly, EditorBase can access any of
mozInlineSpellChecker, EditorSpellCheck, mozSpellChecker and
TextServicesDocument with new accessors created by following patch.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2oyS5tPeQcg
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : a9ce2e4dbceff7ca800d34d60d56eba184298677
Most nsIEditActionListener::Will*() are not implemented, except
WillDeleteText() and WillDeleteSelection() which are implemented by
FinderHighlighter. So, we can get rid of the other Will*() from it.
This patch removes a lot of unnecessary virtual calls and copy of strong
pointers to edit action listeners of EditorBase.
MozReview-Commit-ID: EsqI2tZoBG1
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : cf78eb8d33b12ca65177b0676f6e45d02e7c0688
HTMLEditRules implements only some of nsIEditActionListener and this is always
first edit action listener. So, if we make EditorBase treat HTMLEditRules
directly before notifying edit action listeners, we can save a lot of runtime
cost (virtual calls especially unnecessary, copying array of edit action
listeners with strong pointer, redundant QIs), although the code becomes not
beautiful.
Perhaps, we should do same thing to nsTextServicesDocument and
mozInlineSpellChecker in other bugs.
MozReview-Commit-ID: Eveaxj398f2
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 0b7b66ba1002e08591e8d95ef68b216e7ce1f93b
For calling some methods of mRules from EditorBase, let's move mRules member
from TextEditor to EditorBase.
Unfortunately, TextEditRules.h depends on EditAction which is declared in
EditorBase.h and that caused unnecessary include hell of EditorBase.h. So,
let's move it to an independent header file.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 5HiSZLP9WHH
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 3e2c40385a6f3d6d1e03ef4e213434383bb37d5f
AutoMoveNodeSelNotify doesn't allow container is null. So we should reject
that parent of moving node is null.
MozReview-Commit-ID: DGNCicLJxuK
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : eea203f16d0296c74d0727f34b6ddc5c165f9092
This crashtest case hits assertion in SelAdjInsertNode due to invalid offset
point. So we check whether this is valid.
Also, SelAdjCreateNode and SelAdjInsertNode should use EditorRawDOMPoint to avoid offset calculation and check valid offset.
MozReview-Commit-ID: A1kaKEzc36e
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : c46843fdd6e9e18f49b9cedb008cda6cf3436811
Although, we don't need factory methods for DeleteRangeTransaction,
EditAggregateTransaction nor PlaceholderTransaction, for consistency with the
other transaction classes, they should have factory methods for making easier
to write the code.
For not making the performance slow down, they should be inline methods.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 7jl5yZNFYmP
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 7cd5b5e268a670b3c8855407cc72dec12d34d8ff
This patch creates factory methods for AddStyleSheetTransaction and
RemoveStyleSheetTransaction, and removes EditorBase::CreateTxnForAddStyleSheet()
and EditorBase::CreateTxnForRemoveStyleSheet() instead.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 6dnZctDtNik
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 43eaadbde06e4a0b061ea8136e12ffeccfaf5592
This patch creates two factory methods of ChangeAttributeTransaction. One is
for setting an attribute to specific value. The other is for removing an
attribute. So, EditorBase::CreateTxnForSetAttribute() and
EditorBase::CreateTxnForRemoveAttribute() are unnecessary anymore.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2fEVd3pDXsf
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 674005a5b9fc623999a0f51dc8697027970f06c9
EditorBase::CreateTxnForJoinNode() just hides what it does.
For making the caller clearer, let's create a factory method,
JoinNodeTransaction::MaybeCreate().
MozReview-Commit-ID: 8vADXdzMeuV
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 6a281aff11bfa019c292d26cadd0cd29da12753f
SplitNodeTransaction::Create() just hides what it does. For making its caller
clearer, let's create a factory method, SplitNodeTransaction::Create().
MozReview-Commit-ID: KDiC8dDrLuQ
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : ac04544e10644b8a73375fb2b786e0bc86eb56ae
EditorBaseTransaction::CreateTxnForDeleteNode() just hides what it does.
Instead, let's create a factory method, DeleteNodeTransaction::MaybeCreate()
for making callers clearer.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 8WUYN0BjKSU
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : e0ff8b8434b720dc124c770cd7371d84b949ca8d
DeleteTextTransaction should have 3 factory methods. One is, simply to create
an instance with a pair of offset and length. The others are, to create an
instance for deleting a previous or next character at offset.
The former was EditorBase::CreateTxnForDeleteText() and the latter was
EditorBase::CreateTxnForDeleteCharacter(), but this patch creates
DeleteTextTransaction::MaybeCreate() for the former,
DeleteTextTransaction::MaybeCreateForPreviousCharacter() and
DeleteTextTransaction::MaybeCreateForNextCharacter() for the latter.
MozReview-Commit-ID: DFELbmAJDo3
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 1600984c704b460e1cc09777b81df2906c154cce
EditorBase::CreateTxnForComposition() just hides what it does. For its caller,
creating a factory method, CompositionTransaction::Create(), is clearer what
it does.
Additionally, capsuling the creation in CompositionTransaction class can make
the text node information in TextComposition updated automatically. So, now,
it might be better to update them in DoTransaction() because there is a lag
between creating the transaction and calling DoTransaction(). However, this
patch doesn't want to change any existing behavior. So, this doesn't fix this
issue.
MozReview-Commit-ID: K8ci7ytwh1u
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : d468a0fc997c99f78f7eb46451082e7f1e052890
EditorBase::CreateTxnForCreateElement() just hides what it does. Let's make
the caller what it does with creating CreateElementTransaction::Create().
MozReview-Commit-ID: DYcfQV6KiUZ
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : d3f31b8db92bd3b2af464c66e064dd7b21018960
EditorBase::CreateTxnForInsertNode() just hides what it does. Let's create
InsertNodeTransaction::Create() and make the caller clearer.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2J2WV73cdsm
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 15b6391aee5beca4401e7c7a4ee8bf350a7590fd
EditorBase::CreateTxnForInsertText() just hides what it exactly does.
Rewriting it with a static factory method, InsertTextTransaction::Create()
should be clearer for its caller.
MozReview-Commit-ID: Er7Zlhtbnb0
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 9dc71b3baab839f61153b96806fac5baae5d46cb
The only caller is HTMLEditor::IsEmptyNodeImpl(). So, we can get rid of it.
MozReview-Commit-ID: GTJiXwSCrwM
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : a44b277547d0641f244ff363f5cde8ae44b13eda
Most arguments of the constructor of CompositionTransaction are now stored by
EditorBase::mComposition. So, making it take TextComposition reduces the
number of its arguments.
Note that this patch doesn't make it retrieve TextComposition with
EditorBase::GetComposition() for guaranteeing that the editor has non-nullptr
mComposition.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 3O5wL52UBUy
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 7f48465ef3f2f040e8c526fb7837060ecb6c9147
EditorBase stores a text node, offset in it and length in it of composition
string directly. However, this wastes memory space if user never uses IME
or user only sometimes uses IME. Additionally, storing all data in
TextComposition is better than current design when other classes like
CompositionTransaction wants some information of both EditorBase and
TextComposition.
This patch moves those 3 members from EditorBase to TextComposition.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 4N7wmGGfxmt
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : bd7cb37fe9631b959ec21da40c20751fec269dca
Different from RangeBoundaryBase, EditorDOMPointBase can store only child node.
I.e., mOffset may be invalid until its Offset() is called. So,
GetChildAtOffset() isn't good name. It should be just GetChild().
Similarly, GetNextSiblingOfChildAtOffset() and
GetPreviousSiblingOfChildAtOffset() should be renamed to GetNextSiblingOfChild()
and GetPreviousSiblingOfChild().
MozReview-Commit-ID: WpkPmDwkrL
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 2be1fcbee129f4c96e9b166be5a924845340708f
EditorDOMPointBase::Container() may return nullptr. So, it should be renamed
to GetContainer().
Then, the method name becomes longer and a lot of callers access the result
directly. So, there should be following methods to make the callers shorter:
- GetContainerAsContent() to return the container as nsIContent*.
- GetContainerAsElement() to return the container as dom::Element*.
- GetContainerAsText() to return the container as dom::Text.
- GetContainerAsDOMNode() to return the container as nsIDOMNode*.
- CanContainerHaveChildren() to check if the container can have child nodes.
- IsInDataNode() to check if the point is in a data node including text node.
- IsInTextNode() to check if the point is in a text node.
- IsContainerHTMLElement() to check if the container is specific HTML element.
- IsContainerAnyOfHTMLElements() to check if the container is one of the
specified HTML elements.
MozReview-Commit-ID: LkN2WBbCPj0
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 9da1e70d4c74f7ad573e244cf6c7b21a0c7b4410
Editor code sometimes sets a DOM point to end of a node. In this case, we
need to write |Set(node, node->Length())|. So, it should have
|void SetToEndOf(const nsINode* aContainer)| for making meaning of the code
clearer.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 91shMCD2d84
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 3401af50aabc1b677deeae664e8c56506182d28c
Even after EditorBase::DeleteSelectionAndCreateElement() creates a new element,
it tries to collapse selection with |pointToInsert| which is outdated after
inserting new element.
So, it should recompute the caret position with new DOM tree.
MozReview-Commit-ID: DKh2uhItIol
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : c0c30e1c809784af64e87596b471c472350857a8
Some methods of editor retrieves anchor and focus of selection. However, there
are no methods which directly access RangeBoundary of anchor and focus.
This patch adds it for making editor code simpler and avoiding unnecessary
child offset computation.
MozReview-Commit-ID: EvepQpFMi8S
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 38f3c506db5c9d8790bbd625d552bfbc8d99cebc
Although nsIEditActionListener::WillInsertNode() nobody implements actually,
we should remove it in a follow up bug.
nsIEditActionListener::DidInsertNode() is implemented only by HTMLEditRules.
So, if we make it not use nsIEditActionListener, we can remove it too.
However, keep it for now.
On the other hand, they don't need to receive index of the insertion point.
WillInsertNode() needs next sibling of the insert point, but DidInsertNode()
needs nothing because listener can compute it with new inserted node.
MozReview-Commit-ID: GiTKkVyZJlN
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 9ee38c28217d25d1a3f79b0b458c7b2121350a76
EditorBase::CreateTxnForInsertNode() and EditorBase::InsertNode() should take
|const EditorRawDOMPoint&| as an argument specifying point to insert.
MozReview-Commit-ID: KhK19xS7wXb
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : f7b08b7d049eef8a9c03ee681e53e8d469915b15
Like CreateNodeTransaction, InsertNodeTransaction should use EditorRawDOMPoint
for temporary variable and arguments of its methods and should use RangeBoudary
to store it as its member.
MozReview-Commit-ID: FCGY8x97egb
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : bd5ce45944b8b367afc9b782e881727061d83035
While moving children of a container to another container, mutation observer
may move children before moving and/or move node immediately after the
insertion point. Therefore, EditorBase should store all children which
should be moved with a local variable. Then, move one by one carefully.
E.g., if a child before being moved is moved to different container, it
shouldn't be moved because JS already handles it as expected for the web
app. If next sibling of the insertion point has been moved, EditorBase
should stop moving the remaining children because it may move children to
odd position and it may cause dataloss.
This patch creates EditorBase::MoveChildren() and it moves children carefully
with above checks. Additionally, making its callers simpler, this patch also
creates EditorBase::MovePreviousSiblings() and MoveAllChildren().
MozReview-Commit-ID: FJDdSqXIlqD
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 54bded29dbbd9547339a2c6e1a1264e22fbdc740
No one uses nsIInlineSpellChecker.spellCheckAfterEditorChange from script.
So I think we can mark this interface as noscript.
Since this method is scriptable, we need QI to get nsIDOMNode. If we can
change to noscript, it can reduce QI to get nsIDOMNode.
MozReview-Commit-ID: GC0WuFyTlaZ
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 16ca9fc548e86747ac17407be48295c709174fb5
First of all, this patches fixes a bug of EditorBase::CreateNode(). It takes
|EditorRawDOMPoint&| but it should be |const EditorRawDOMPoint&| for making
callers can specify temporary instances.
Next, this patch creates |SplitNodeResult| stack class for result of
EditorBase::SplitNodeDeep(). SplitNodeDeep() needs to return previous node
and next node of split point. They are called as left node and right node,
but these calls are really different term usage. Therefore, this patch names:
aOutLeftNode -> SplitNodeResult::GetPreviousNode()
aOutRightNode -> SplitNodeResult::GetNextNode()
and also declares SplitNodeResult::GetLeftNode() and
SplitNodeResult::GetRightNode() which are same meaning as left/right node of
other splitting methods.
Additionally, of course, this patch makes SplitNodeDeep() use
|const EditorRawDOMPoint&| to receive the start point of right node.
MozReview-Commit-ID: FnJpeKgtzm4
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 3829e5528ef837b13fed305e0df1dbbf00e02a07
Make the loop in EditorBase::SplitNodeDeep() use EditorDOMPoint for making the
code simpler.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 3do3rWV4eIh
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 480a5b5b133d8a735bda6ddec07e4edf9ef34035
Now, we can merge two if blocks in the loop of EditorBase::SplitNodeDeep() and
get rid of |didSplit| variable.
MozReview-Commit-ID: LJZHF6x2GLR
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 5f58508f6fc0928236252670c85383a13200fc2c
This doesn't change any meaning of the loop.
It is a bug if the loop meets orphan node before meeting the most ancestor
node to be split which is given as aNode. So, we can check it before trying
to split it.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 1TD7WHCoZh1
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 17b8d7b3db458e29fb52be5cedb900560e1b70a4
EmptyContainers::yes and EmptyContainers::no are not so clear name what they
mean.
They means whether NodeSplitDeep() creates or won't create empty nodes when
split point is at start edge or end edge of an element.
This patch renames them to SplitAtEdges::eDoNotCreateEmptyContainer and
SplitAtEdges::eAllowToCreateEmptyContainer and make
HTMLEditor::InsertNodeAtPoint() use it instead of an bool argument.
Additionally, the argument of NodeSplitDeep() is now not optional because
this difference is really important when you read around the callers.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 9hpMRkVDvCg
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : ee892361d66c9c9c5ed45ee9d3321474257ac417
nsIEditActionListner::DidSplitNode() takes 4 arguments, the right node,
old offset in the old right node before splitting, the new left node and
nsresult.
Computing offset for this doesn't make sense because it's always same as
the length of the left node. Additionally, nobody currently use nsersult.
So, we can get rid of it now.
Fortunately, nobody including comm-central and BlueGriffon implements
WillSplitNode(). So, we can get rid of it. However, removing interface
method should be done in a follow up bug. So, we can remove offset computation
in EditorBase::SplitNode() completely in the future.
MozReview-Commit-ID: JWj34SjBNJh
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : f0e1ed0e466dc8217c1a0ab1722790883a7efd1f
EditorBase::CreateTxnForSplitNode() and EditorBase::SplitNode() takes a set of
container and offset in it for specifying a point to split.
Instead, they should take EditorRawDOMPoint for specifying start of right node.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 5VwS8oudzIT
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 727948e5cf95f0713019f57ae9a007b85569fa56
Make SplitNodeTransaction stores start of existing right node (which will be
split) instead of split point as a pair of the right node and offset in it.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2DIpJGSuNaC
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 13949bdddc30c59462e7fea7fadf29f015ab8d3a
EditorBaseSplitNodeImpl() should be clean up with EditorDOMPoint which should
be an argument to point the first point of right node (existing split node).
MozReview-Commit-ID: DN0yHm9G9yT
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 256b4e2125e831b7be9e5c4aefc6f04c80e3c1f5
An overload of EditorBase::GetNextNode() takes a set of container, child node
and offset of the child in the container. Replacing it with EditorRawDOMPoint
makes the caller simpler.
Additionally, it has two bool arguments, one is for searching if editable node,
the other is for searching if in same block. So, they can be hidden with
some human readable inline methods.
When I was creating this patch, I realized that
GetNextNodeInternal(const EditorRawDOMPoint& aPoint) may return
aPoint.GetChildAtOffset(). I.e., it starts to search from the specified point
rather than next node. On the other hand, GetNextNodeInternal(nsINode& aNode)
never returns aNode itself. So, it there is better name instead of "Next",
we should take it. But I have no better idea. So, this patch just explains
the difference with comments in EditorBase.h.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 4Lb6o9SJuhy
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : d20d728eae69659ef448b6679ae8f73d64c2d7e9
An overload of EditorBase::GetPriorNode() takes a set of container, child node
and offset of the child in the container. Replacing it with EditorRawDOMPoint
makes the caller simpler.
Additionally, it has two bool arguments, one is for searching if editable node,
the other is for searching if in same block. So, they can be hidden with
some human readable inline methods.
Finally, "Prior" isn't a term of DOM. So, let's use "Previous" instead.
MozReview-Commit-ID: A9uKzHaikY9
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 15bfdfde0ad89a5331d6c8a24351741eeef476d5
EditorBase::InsertTextImpl() takes |nsCOMPtr<nsINode>*|, |nsCOMPtr<nsIContent>*|
and |int32_t| as in/out arguments for container, child and offset of the child
in the container. But this makes the callers really hard to read and ugly.
So, we should make the method take |const EditorRawDOMPoint&| argument as input
and |EditorRawDOMPoint*| as out argument.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2ijIfGl4Zo7
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : b309d9bdc04aac620f138769ba18ad7e4597fe6c
EditorBase::FindBetterInsertionPoint() now use 3 in/out arguments. This is
really ugly and making the callers hard to read. So, let's make it take an
argument whose type is |const EditorRawDOMPoint&| and return other
EditorRawDOMPoint instance.
Additionally, this fixes bugs of text node length checks in the method.
Basically, this shouldn't affect to any actual behavior, though. That is
because text node shouldn't be able to have string longer than INT32_MAX.
MozReview-Commit-ID: FClUQSJzd8c
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 3e2fbd345015f7068c7e35a94c31731e7936009f
EditorBase::CreateNode() should take EditorRawDOMPoint as insertion point of
the new element instead of a set of container, child and offset of the child
in the container.
This patch initializes EditorRawDOMPoint with original 3 arguments as far as
possible. If the relation of them are broken, MOZ_ASSERT in RawRangeBoundary
constructor detects existing bugs.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2N55S6pRv7k
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 2b14a7715815ca0007635b8f791ca9edbe5b65f1
nsIEditActionListener::WillCreateElement() and
nsIEditActionListener::DidCreateElement() are implemented only by m-c.
So, we can remove a set of container node and offset in it from their argument.
Instead, WillCreateElement() should take a node which will be next sibling of
the new node.
Note that only implementation of them is, HTMLEditRules::DidCreateElement().
So, we can get rid of them and can call HTMLEditRules::DidCreateElement()
directly from EditorBase::CreateNode(). However, such change should be done
in another bug which checks all nsIEditActionListener method implementations.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 4LQEs2WwrVC
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : ee1bee1413c578b2873a291c712b8ef46221db0f
The constructor of CreateElementTransaction now takes EditorRawDOMPoint instead
of a set of container node and offset in it. So, its only user,
EditorBase::CreateTxnForCreateElement(), should take EditorRawDOMPoint too.
MozReview-Commit-ID: A8QfPM3LRii
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 4a99e5cb58230649d19faca788a330fe02eb6bb1
The constructor of CreateElementTransaction should use EditorRawDOMPoint to
receive insertion point of the new element. Then, it should be stored with
RangeBoundary. With this change, CreateElementTransaction doesn't need to
compute child node at insertion point.
Additionally, this creates InsertNode() method. Current code works differently
when DoTransaction() is called and RedoTransaction() is called.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 8ujhmzn65Wg
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 30cc045a30a3836f211d11e5f70a85804f44a72a
In some places, editor computes index from child node for collapsing selection
at the child node. However, it's expensive. Therefore, editor should use
Selection::Collapse(const RawRangeBoundary&) as far as possible.
MozReview-Commit-ID: LF2MwASuXzZ
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : b7afc35c0d9d88845391b6f18de57cbff1935ae4
EditorUtils::IsDescendantOf() current takes a pointer to offset or a pointer to
child content if the caller needs to know the child of the most ancestor node.
However, some callers should get a child as EditorDOMPoint or EditorRawDOMPoint.
Then, they can be used for some editor methods which need to take child node
for performance optimization.
This patch makes EditorUtils::IsDescendantOf() as only two overloads. One takes
pointer to EditorRawDOMPoint as optional out argument. The other takes pointer
to EditorDOMPoint as an out param.
Additionally, this creates new constructor of AutoTrackDOMPoint for making it
can treat EditorDOMPoint directly.
MozReview-Commit-ID: IsAGTUvKI19
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 97469a21b974c6a1dd515ab472bbc4a88c1899c8
RangeBoundaryBase shouldn't compute mRef when it's initialized with offset.
E.g., some users of the template class may initialize it with a container and
offset in it but it may not refer mRef or may refer after modifying offset.
On the other hand, RangeBoundaryBase::InvalidateOffset() is a special method.
It assumes that mRef is always initialized when it's called but can be
invalidate mOffset until retrieved actually. This is necessary for
nsRange::mStart and nsRange::mEnd since the offset may be changed when
some nodes are inserted before the referring node.
So, now, InvalidateOffset() should be a protected method and make nsRange a
friend class of RangeBoundaryBase. Then, when nsRange sets mStart and/or mEnd,
nsRange itself should guarantee that their mRefs are initialized.
MozReview-Commit-ID: Alr4YkDXIND
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 7e6828374db7989ae91b9e485571ec553f7435af
A lot of methods in editor returns a child offset with an out param when it
returns its container and offset in the container. This is ugly hack for
performance of nsINode::IndexOf(). However, there are a lot of regression
since the relation between offset and child node can be broken really easily.
So, we should make EditorDOMPoint as a subclass of RangeBoundary and manage
a set of container, reference child and its offset in it (e.g.,
SetNextSibling() added by this patch).
Note that RangeBoundary's performance is not good for temporary use if we set
a point with offset, it immediately retrieves mRef. The following patch will
improve this performance.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 7mcJ1P1OjVr
--HG--
rename : editor/libeditor/EditorUtils.h => editor/libeditor/EditorDOMPoint.h
extra : rebase_source : 785094fcfc592d9e5b48cbc36ed225dbb8bb4111
Currently, HTMLEditRules::WillInsertBreak() checks if the editing host can
contain a <p> element as a child or a descendant. However, this is not enough.
If an inline element has a block element which can contain a <p> element,
current implementation considers to insert a <br>. This is possible when
* The editing host is an unknown element including user defined element.
* The editing host is an inline element and its children and/or descendants
were added by JS. E.g., <span contenteditable> element can have <div>
element.
I think that we should consider to insert a <br> element when:
- There is no block ancestors in the editing host.
- The editing host is the only block element and it cannot contain <p> element
or the default paragraph separator is <br> element.
- The nearest block ancestor isn't a single-line container declared in the
execCommand spec and there are no block elements which can contain <p>
element.
Note that Chromium checks if CSS box of ancestors is block too. However,
it must be out of scope of this bug.
MozReview-Commit-ID: HdjU9t83Nd1
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 7030671268a610613359b5d8ae5d126e120f59bd
Since if the container is not a container node like a text node or the offset
is same as the length, child at the offset can be nullptr.
MozReview-Commit-ID: DCnFwUjNgk7
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 48823390645d79db391dcaf64dab59e754b680a5
Editor sometimes extracts atom to string to compare element name.
It is unnecessary to use atom directly.
MozReview-Commit-ID: FEvyiIeaozs
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 4418d0c82fa4fedd814b914f2cf3a86d74ad9835
