This is necessary to facilitate the transition to cloning attributes instead of reparsing them.
MozReview-Commit-ID: Gyd1tD6ldly
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 777cfed750c95c448f953a6ec98026481997e227
Disable 461917-1.xhtml under dom/xul/crashtests/ because I cannot reproduce
it locally.
Annotate assert-if on some crashtests (bug 1370830). Other modifications are
all removal of fails-if.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 6Q2A5M5rOry
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : b282a919fcda6287fe2eaa6b139a11f2663ad578
In gecko style backend, nsXBLPrototypeResources calls GatherRuleProcessor()
after all the XBL stylesheets are loaded. We use ServoStyleSet to implement
the similar functionality for stylo.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 431XGFALtDY
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 34327d71e1c88717463b2e8f7dfbda804aca0664
We'll need the bound element to get PresContext in a later patch.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2Gcb0yKgbTH
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 6549eb726c32e25bea6045027805492984521d48
The <content> in an XBL document could be injected into documents with
different style backend types. Therefore, we need to set the XBL document's
style backend to the same as the bound document's so that the style
attribute of the content can be processed by the correct backend. <marquee>
elements in xbl-marquee.xml is one such example.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 7M33zlbZqNF
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 363fd7c2bc91e959fbcfb288bdc1b65cfd1bba97
We assume those XBL documents without a bound document use gecko style
backend. Their backend type will be explicitly set when loading in Part 6.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 5c5xtYFvgAD
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 578b50953d98ffa5280dac3440979e2aba7519cb
Currently, attribute and child arrays (implemented in dom/base/nsAttrAndChildArray.h) start out empty. When cloning, the array ends up being resized multiple times in order to add the attributes and children that are being cloned from the original node. This would be quicker if the array was initialized to the correct size in the first place so that resizes are not necessary.
However, preallocating space for children is only necessary when performing a deep clone. Therefore, an additional parameter is being added to the Clone, CopyInnerTo, and CloneDocHelper methods to indicate whether preallocation of children should happen. Attributes are copied either way, so that part of the array is preallocated in both cases.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 3iVezeAKXnI
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 9c3deec6d7aafd6411044d623d4863637b45fd58
The test doesn't verify that the exceptions are reported to the browser console,
but I manually checked that they are. Adding a test for that part could be
pretty annoying.
The test doesn't verify that the exceptions are reported to the browser console,
but I manually checked that they are. Adding a test for that part could be
pretty annoying.
It's not only inefficient, but also prone to buggyness. Since styles may not be
up-to-date when it happens.
Post a reconstruct instead, which ensures a style flush happens before running
frame construction.
MozReview-Commit-ID: DrakHsJv5fY
Signed-off-by: Emilio Cobos Álvarez <emilio@crisal.io>
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 11900af908654336cc2391ab9480542c5474e38f
This patch is generated by the following sed script:
find . ! -wholename '*/.hg*' -type f \( -iname '*.html' -o -iname '*.xhtml' -o -iname '*.xul' -o -iname '*.js' \) -exec sed -i -e 's/\(\(text\|application\)\/javascript\);version=1.[0-9]/\1/g' {} \;
MozReview-Commit-ID: AzhtdwJwVNg
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : e8f90249454c0779d926f87777f457352961748d
I noticed that our current behavior in ContentRangeInserted is incorrect. Unlike
ContentInserted (where this code lived originally), ContentRangeInserted takes a
start and end element. I'm not sure if we ever take that path for new content that
needs style, but it seemed sketchy. And generally, it seems nice to just always
style new content the same way (though we still need to style NAC by the subtree
root, since it hasn't been attached to the parent yet).
For situations where there is indeed only one unstyled child, the traversal
overhead should be neglible, since we special-case the single-element in
parallel.rs to avoid calling into rayon.
Being more explicit about what we want here also makes us more robust against
the other handful of callpaths that can take us into
nsCSSFrameConstructor::{ContentRangeInserted,ContentAppended}. Currently we
can call StyleNewSubtree on an already-styled element via RecreateFramesForContent,
which triggers an assertion in the servo traversal.
MozReview-Commit-ID: DqCGh90deHH
