For conforming to our coding rules, |result| of nsresult variants should be renamed to |rv|.
MozReview-Commit-ID: Bk8CyLAnvXQ
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : dd3dc34a032f22abf3fd7f85556b47ffbeec55b2
Currently, editor code uses following style (or similar style) in a lot of places:
if (foo)
{
}
else
{
}
This patch fixes this as conforming to our coding rules, i.e., it becomes:
if (foo) {
} else {
}
Additionally, this fixes other odd control statements in the files which include above issue because it's difficult to find following issues with searching the files:
* if (foo) bar;
* if (foo) { bar; }
* if (foo)
bar;
Finally, if it becomes much simpler than current code, this patch rewrites existing code with "early return style". But this case is only a few places because this is risky.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2Gs26goWXrF
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 603f9003a3566b3203bdeb27dc73ac33502d2853
In our coding rules, variable names of nsresult should be rv. Indeed, when you see |rv| in the code, you must assume that its type if nsresult.
However, a lot of code under editor/ uses |res| for the variables of nsresult. Let's replace |res| with |rv|.
And this patch improves following points:
1. When |rv| is set in both |if| and |else| block and they are check outside of them, this moves the check into each |if| and |else| block because even if the failure is notified with warning, you cannot see which case was performed and failed. This change makes it clear.
2. When |return rv;| returns non-error code because |rv| is checked with NS_ENSURE_SUCCESS() immediately before, setting replacing it with |return NS_OK;| is clearer.
3. Move declaration of |nsresult rv| into smaller scope as far as possible. This prevents setting rv to unexpected value and easier to check its value at reading the code.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 9MAqj7sFey3
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 0fd316b851ea616b3a95d8c1afc111ff55e11993
If the user tries to insert text without moving the cursor, the
invisible break will become visible, which from the user's perspective
means an extra line break was inserted for no reason.
The IsVisBreak change here is a bit scary, because it may result in
unexpected behavior changes, but it seems to improve correctness. If it
turns out to cause problems, it can be added as a special case to
GetGoodSelPointForNode instead.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 7SRQYHYtJvF
If the user tries to insert text without moving the cursor, the
invisible break will become visible, which from the user's perspective
means an extra line break was inserted for no reason.
The IsVisBreak change here is a bit scary, because it may result in
unexpected behavior changes, but it seems to improve correctness. If it
turns out to cause problems, it can be added as a special case to
GetGoodSelPointForNode instead.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 7SRQYHYtJvF
This patch also renames:
EditorInputEventDispatcher -> mozilla::EditorInputEventDispatcher
And some variable names are renamed from aEditor or mEditor to aEditorBase or mEditorBase for making their types clearer.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 2FCXWpLMn8e
--HG--
rename : editor/libeditor/nsEditor.cpp => editor/libeditor/EditorBase.cpp
rename : editor/libeditor/nsEditor.h => editor/libeditor/EditorBase.h
This patch renames:
ResizerSelectionListener -> mozilla::ResizerSelectionListener
ResizerMouseMotionListener -> mozilla::ResizerMouseMotionListener
DocumentResizeEventListener -> mozilla::DocumentResizeEventListener
And making the header file name HTMLEditorObjectResizerUtils.h because it doesn't define specific class related to its file name and should be clearer that it's related to HTMLEditor.
MozReview-Commit-ID: GOJyEwtFdJV
--HG--
rename : editor/libeditor/nsHTMLObjectResizer.h => editor/libeditor/HTMLEditorObjectResizerUtils.h
