We currently determine if we need refresh driver ticks when composing style
but sometimes we might not need ticks for composing style but we might need
one more tick in order to queue a final end event. Currently, this doesn't
seem to be a problem because FlushAnimations calls Animation::Tick where we
queue up events. When we remove the call to Animation::Tick from
FlushAnimations in order to make FlushAnimations purely responsible for
posting restyles, however, we will create a situation where we might mark an
animation collection as no longer needing refreshes and not simultaneously
queueing the corresponding event. If another animation collection is deleted in
the meantime we may trigger the code that causes us to disassociate from the
refresh driver and the corresponding event will never be dispatched.
Long-term (bug 1195180) we will check if it we can stop observing the refresh
driver and queue events in the same step. Until then, this patch adds a method
to detect this particular situation and uses it to avoid unregistering from
the refresh driver while we still have end events to queue.
The patch removes 455 occurrences of FAIL_ON_WARNINGS from moz.build files, and
adds 78 instances of ALLOW_COMPILER_WARNINGS. About half of those 78 are in
code we control and which should be removable with a little effort.
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 82e3387abfbd5f1471e953961d301d3d97ed2973
Now KeyframeEffect.SetTiming() updates the owning animation timing and relavance, so
we don't need to call each methods respectively for the animation any more.
We currently have a series of methods that clobber various bits of animation
state to force animations on layers to be updated. This aligns closely with
the restyle code introduced in this patch series.
By re-using RequestRestyle when updating animations on layers, not only should
we be able to simplify the code somewhat but, in future, we should also be able
to have Animation objects use the same mechanism to update layers during
a regular tick.
For example, currently we have a bug where when an animation starts after
a delay with the same value as the backwards fill then we don't send the
animation to the compositor right away (see
https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/d6ea652c579992daa9041cc9718bb7c6abefbc91/layout/style/test/test_animations_omta.html#287).
By adding this Restyle::Layer value we should be able to fix that in future.
In preparation for ultimately being able to run animations without a manager,
this patch moves the request restyle code from FlushAnimations to
Animation::Tick. (Ultimately most of this functionality should move to the
KeyframeEffect but for now Animation is fine.)
We want to move the newly-introduced RequestRestyle call from FlushAnimations
to Animation::Tick. However, nsAnimationManager::CheckAnimationRule calls
Animation::Tick so this would cause us to start posting animation restyles
within a restyle.
Typically, Animations have an effect (currently there is only one type of
effect: KeyframeEffectReadOnly) and when there is any change in timing they
pass it down to their effect. However, the Animation is dependent on the
duration of the effect for determining if it is "finished" or not. As a result,
when an effect's timing changes, the owning Animation needs to know.
(The way this *should* work is that effects should tell their animation or
trigger some chain of events that causes animation's to update themselves.
However, the current implementation of effects is fairly primitive and does
not do this or even have a reference to the owning Animation. When we
implement the script API for updating the timing properties of effects we will
have to fix this but for now it is up to code in layout/style to update the
Animation when it touches the corresponding effect's timing.)
nsAnimationManager::CheckAnimationRule currently does this by calling
Animation::Tick() which ensures the Animation's finished state is updated
accordingly.
Ultimately we want to ensure that Animation::Tick is called exactly once per
frame (and at the appropriate point in that frame) so we'd like to remove this
call from CheckAnimationRule.
This patch achieves that by:
* Making Animation::SetEffect update the animation's timing - this is necessary
for animations that are created by CheckAnimationRule and will be
necessary when once we make Animation.effect writeable from script anyway.
* Calling Animation::SetEffect even for the case when we are updating the
existing effect.
Another side-effect of calling Animation::Tick within
nsAnimationManager::CheckAnimationRule is that CSSAnimation::Tick queues
events. There are some tests (e.g. layout/style/test/test_animations.html) that
assume that animationstart events are dispatched immediately when new
animations are created. That will change with bug 1134163 but for now we
should maintain this existing behavior since changing this might introduce
compatibility issues that are best dealt with as a separate bug rather than
blocking this refactoring. To that end, this patch also explicitly queues
animationstart events for newly-created animations.
KeyframeEffectReadOnly uses IsFinishedTransition to exclude finished transitions
from certain tests. This check, however, is redundant in each case.
This is because any effect marked as IsFinishedTransition will have the
following properties:
- owning animation's PlayState() == Finished or Idle
- animation phase = after or null
- progress = null (this is because transitions don't fill forwards)
Animation::ComposeStyle uses IsFinishedTransition to skip doing work for
transitions that have run their course. We can, however, generalize this to
cover all animations that are not currently contributing to the animated
style--that is animations that are not "in effect".
We need to add this check *after* we update aNeedsRefreshes since an animation
that is not "in effect" because it has a delay and no backwards fill (in this
case it will have a play state of "running") still needs refreshes.
Previously we used IsFinishedTransition so that if the only animations present
are finished transitions we could throttle the tick. In fact, this probably
shouldn't even be necessary since we shouldn't be calling CanThrottle if
AnimationCollection::mNeedsRefreshes is false. However, so long as we're
performing this test it turns out we can generalize this further and throttle
ticks for all finished animations that are not newly finished, regardless of
whether they are running on the compositor or not (although this method won't
be called unless the animation property could be run on the compositor anyway).
This method is somewhat confusing. For one, it is not strictly limited to
animations that are running on the compositor. It appears to only return true
when the animation is running on the compositor but the mIsRunningOnCompositor
flag doesn't get cleared when the animation finishes (bug 1151694). As a result
this method also deals with animations that are now running on the main thread.
This patch makes us deal with such animations more consistently.
This patch also reworks this method so that it's hopefully a little easier to
follow and a little more consistent since I spent several hours trying to
understand the different combinations of inputs this method could take and what
question it was trying to answer.
The long-term plan is to drop the mozilla::css namespace altogether. Before we
go to much further with refactoring code in AnimationCommon, we should drop
usage of the mozilla::css namespace. Specifically, this patch moves the
CommonAnimationManager and AnimValuesStyleRule classes to the mozilla namespace.
This patch prepares the way for script-generated events by making
event dispatch a separate process that happens after sampling animations.
This will allow us to sample animations from their associated timeline
(removing the need for a further manager to tracker script-generated
animations).
Furthermore, once we sample animations from timelines the order in which they
are sampled is likely to be more or less random so by making event dispatch at
separate step, we have an opportunity to sort the events and dispatch in
a consistent and sensible order. It also ensures that event callbacks will
not be run until all animations (including transitions) have been updated
ensuring they see a consistent view of timing properties.
This patch only affects event handling for CSS animations. Transitions will
be dealt with in a subsequent patch.
The long-term plan is to drop the mozilla::css namespace altogether. Before we
go to much further with refactoring code in AnimationCommon, we should drop
usage of the mozilla::css namespace. Specifically, this patch moves the
CommonAnimationManager and AnimValuesStyleRule classes to the mozilla namespace.
This patch prepares the way for script-generated events by making
event dispatch a separate process that happens after sampling animations.
This will allow us to sample animations from their associated timeline
(removing the need for a further manager to tracker script-generated
animations).
Furthermore, once we sample animations from timelines the order in which they
are sampled is likely to be more or less random so by making event dispatch at
separate step, we have an opportunity to sort the events and dispatch in
a consistent and sensible order. It also ensures that event callbacks will
not be run until all animations (including transitions) have been updated
ensuring they see a consistent view of timing properties.
This patch only affects event handling for CSS animations. Transitions will
be dealt with in a subsequent patch.
The bulk of this commit was generated by running:
run-clang-tidy.py \
-checks='-*,llvm-namespace-comment' \
-header-filter=^/.../mozilla-central/.* \
-fix
We'll likely address this as part of bug 1151731 when we sample animations from
their timeline.
--HG--
extra : commitid : 9g00bBtDIue
extra : rebase_source : 12d9de2524eb3133bef5a5bcf4c84d4759ccbbca
This patch also removes the (commented-out) play() method from the
AnimationTimeline.webidl since it has been removed from the spec.
--HG--
extra : commitid : 20j8RFhPyP9
extra : rebase_source : 9eb5376f3ad9f4a4a0a214bdbe5593f682316d5b
We only store relevant animations on the timeline. Relevant animations are
any animations that are running or yet to run ("current animations") or
which have finished but are still applying a fill mode ("in effect animations").
AnimationTimeline.getAnimations() only ever returns relevant animations so
this is the minimum set we need to keep track of. Keeping track of any more
than this would prevent us from garbage-collecting any no longer relevant
animations since we keep a strong reference to this animations.
The reason we keep a strong reference is that if an animation is attached to
a timeline, even if there are no references to it from script or markup it
needs to be kept alive in order to dispatch events or resolve promises. An
irrelevant animation however is not going to do either of these things without
outside intervention so we don't need to keep it alive.
--HG--
extra : commitid : WLEUccOqAk
extra : rebase_source : 5c3c987d6c95ca7072c6178349dc113d2f1e5053
This is in anticipation of adding Animation::SetTimeline(). Once we set the
timeline out of band, there's a chance that getting it could return null so
this patch makes the WebIDL and method name reflect that.
--HG--
extra : commitid : FSiwvrGRV1v
extra : rebase_source : 4c4004f58bbfd340642277b0a0b547a7de692dac
The connection between an Animation and an AnimationTimeline is optional. That
is, it is possible to have an Animation without an AnimationTimeline. Until now
we have often just assumed the timeline will be set but eventually we need to
support the possibility of the timeline being null. Indeed, later in this patch
series we will set the timeline out-of-band (i.e. not in the constructor) using
SetTimeline which opens up the possibility that timeline will be null for
a period of time.
This patch paves the way for having an optional timeline by storing the global
used for, e.g. creating promises, on the Animation object itself.
--HG--
extra : commitid : Ew9Zp4t36lV
extra : rebase_source : 16c9de9525a3562ff10e41fdf1602384a4e366e3
This is needed not only for supporting other kinds of timelines, but also for
when we come to implement SetTimeline(AnimationTimeline* aTimeline).
--HG--
extra : commitid : B836jCSbgNL
extra : rebase_source : 2592e66b2a9009f85ec0189ebecf5dba3c9bf8e0
This is not strictly necessary yet but we will want to implement methods
like GetAnimations() on the base class, AnimationTimeline, so we may as well do
that now rather than adding that code to DocumentTimeline and moving it later.
--HG--
extra : commitid : 7GU6Dr9lnPO
extra : rebase_source : d5e788874c72c422b57efbdb81404c79df6d505b
Having created composite ordering methods for the different kinds of animations
this patch adds a Comparator class so that they can be used to sort an
array of such animations.
This patch uses this Comparator object to sort the results returned by
Element.getAnimations. For this case, the order in which we create animations
and transitions happens to almost perfectly correspond with the composite
ordering defined so that no sorting is necessary.
One exception is that some -moz-* transitions may be created after transitions
that they should sort before when sorting by transition property. In this
case the sorting added in this patch should ensure they are returned in the
correct sequence.
Unfortunately, we can't easily test this since the test files we have are
intended to be cross-browser (where -moz-* properties won't be supported).
Once we implement AnimationTimeline.getAnimations (bug 1150810) we'll have
a better opportunity to test this sorting. For now, the added tests in this
patch just serve as a regression test that the sorting hasn't upset the
already correct order (and an interop test in future once we move them to
web-platform-tests).
--HG--
extra : commitid : KkfoSE69B0F
extra : rebase_source : ee4e47f44281504eb4d35e0f6cc3392ee0cffb94