Mostly renaming for clarity, as the gradient parsing code is a bit hairy.
This also changes -webkit- gradients, which is, I think, the right thing to do
(otherwise I need to give up on the type system and sprinkle parse_non_negatives
around, which would be unfortunate).
I filed https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1008112 on
Chromium still accepting negative radii for those, so will wait to submit the
patch for review until they reply there with their intentions.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D47141
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Doesn't recognize all the edge cases, but I think this should be good enough.
Let me know if you think something common is missing.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D47469
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Doesn't recognize all the edge cases, but I think this should be good enough.
Let me know if you think something common is missing.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D47469
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Now all test cases for individual transform properties work fine on GeckoView.
Depends on D47200
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D47201
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Also, update the serialization by the shorter perference because this is
a new feature and using older syntax doesn't make sense.
Besides, use `cssOffset` for web animation IDL attribute name.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D45607
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
People keep adding useless null-checks and it was not clear what the consensus
was from bug 1441165, but this should be unobjectionable I guess.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D46781
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Now that we count them, I think we should do this.
This property is pretty painful for various reasons:
* It's a pretty awkward non-standard property.
* Has a pretty short name, so people use it instead of the standard
alternatives.
* We cannot really even implement it easily anyhow, without breaking a whole
bunch of stuff, because pages do things like:
```
myelement {
zoom: 0.5;
-moz-transform: scale(0.5);
transform-origin: 0 0;
}
```
For now this is only recorded when CSS use counters are enabled (Nightly for
now), but I want to change it once bug 1578661 is in central.
The hope is that this warning slightly raises awareness of this property not
being standard. You get a CSS parsing error in the console, but those are
usually too noisy and disabled by default.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D46430
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
By reporting the properties in MappedAttrParser that we used to (the test relies
on counting those), and by adjusting the histogram name to the new thing.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D44697
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
We only have two counters enabled, just for testing, and they just count from
the SVG mapped attribute code. That's not great, and they mostly complicate the
next few patches.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D44695
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
By reporting the properties in MappedAttrParser that we used to (the test relies
on counting those), and by adjusting the histogram name to the new thing.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D44697
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
We only have two counters enabled, just for testing, and they just count from
the SVG mapped attribute code. That's not great, and they mostly complicate the
next few patches.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D44695
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
By reporting the properties in MappedAttrParser that we used to (the test relies
on counting those), and by adjusting the histogram name to the new thing.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D44697
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
We only have two counters enabled, just for testing, and they just count from
the SVG mapped attribute code. That's not great, and they mostly complicate the
next few patches.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D44695
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
By reporting the properties in MappedAttrParser that we used to (the test relies
on counting those), and by adjusting the histogram name to the new thing.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D44697
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
We only have two counters enabled, just for testing, and they just count from
the SVG mapped attribute code. That's not great, and they mostly complicate the
next few patches.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D44695
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
When we call nsContentUtils::IsPatternMatching, we swallow JS engine errors
unconditionally returning true.
This is bad, because if it happens in one of the value sets that arguably
shouldn't change the state of the element, we end up returning an arbitrary
value (true) which may or may not match the previous state of the element.
Handle error explicitly instead, by not updating the state.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D45727
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
justify-items' initial value is `legacy` and the computed value depends on the
parent's value.
We don't use flex / grid in the scrollbars, so just avoid asserting about this
property.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D45673
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Stylo's Gecko wrapper duplicated some logic from the C++ side so
that the Rust compiler would be able to optimize better. Now that
we have xLTO, this kind of manual inlining should not be neccessary
anymore.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D43765
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
The wpt will be updated in
https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/18866.
Besides, there are some other test cases use text-decoration, so we
have to update them as well. The rule is: if the test case is not related to
old `text-decoration` longhand, we use `text-decoration-line` instead.
If the test case is for testing the change of `text-decoration` from
longhand to shorthand, we should use the correct serialization.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D44909
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
