We do this because we will be introducing more privileged content processes
and we want to be able to distinguish them.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D30274
--HG--
rename : browser/base/content/test/tabs/browser_new_tab_in_privileged_process_pref.js => browser/base/content/test/tabs/browser_new_tab_in_privilegedabout_process_pref.js
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
The requestor should be ourselves: the toplevel docshell that the tabgroup does
not need to look in when doing the search.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32422
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Previously the `WebNavigationChild` would keep track of when triggering its
`nsIWebNavigation`, `goForward`, `goBack`, `gotoIndex`, and `loadURI` methods.
It's `nsIWebNavigation` instance is always an `nsIDocShell` and as part of
porting `OnStateChange` and `OnLocationChange` events from
`WebProgressChild`/`RemoteWebProgress` to `BrowserChild`/`BrowserParent`, this
informations needs to be available from the `BrowserChild`. As it stands, it is
currently an expando property on the `WebProgressChild`.
Instead of introducing yet another XPCOM interface for the WebProgressChild, we
now store this information directly on the `nsDocShell`. Furthermore, instead
of having the `WebNavigationChild` manage this part of the `nsDocShell`'s
state, we can have the `nsDocShell` manage this state itself so it is always
consistent.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D28124
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Previously the `WebNavigationChild` would keep track of when triggering its
`nsIWebNavigation`, `goForward`, `goBack`, `gotoIndex`, and `loadURI` methods.
It's `nsIWebNavigation` instance is always an `nsIDocShell` and as part of
porting `OnStateChange` and `OnLocationChange` events from
`WebProgressChild`/`RemoteWebProgress` to `BrowserChild`/`BrowserParent`, this
informations needs to be available from the `BrowserChild`. As it stands, it is
currently an expando property on the `WebProgressChild`.
Instead of introducing yet another XPCOM interface for the WebProgressChild, we
now store this information directly on the `nsDocShell`. Furthermore, instead
of having the `WebNavigationChild` manage this part of the `nsDocShell`'s
state, we can have the `nsDocShell` manage this state itself so it is always
consistent.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D28124
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This bug will use the browsing context to notify content tab to mute/unmute media, instead of using MessageManager. We would use the top level canonical browsing context to
set the media mute property for the top level window and propagate it to other top level windows in other processes.
If we don't do so, we're not able to mute/unmute media in the different process when we we enable Fission, because the current way we use can only notify one process and would cause the media on other process can't be muted/unmuted.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32077
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Previously the `WebNavigationChild` would keep track of when triggering its
`nsIWebNavigation`, `goForward`, `goBack`, `gotoIndex`, and `loadURI` methods.
It's `nsIWebNavigation` instance is always an `nsIDocShell` and as part of
porting `OnStateChange` and `OnLocationChange` events from
`WebProgressChild`/`RemoteWebProgress` to `BrowserChild`/`BrowserParent`, this
informations needs to be available from the `BrowserChild`. As it stands, it is
currently an expando property on the `WebProgressChild`.
Instead of introducing yet another XPCOM interface for the WebProgressChild, we
now store this information directly on the `nsDocShell`. Furthermore, instead
of having the `WebNavigationChild` manage this part of the `nsDocShell`'s
state, we can have the `nsDocShell` manage this state itself so it is always
consistent.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D28124
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Previously the `WebNavigationChild` would keep track of when triggering its
`nsIWebNavigation`, `goForward`, `goBack`, `gotoIndex`, and `loadURI` methods.
It's `nsIWebNavigation` instance is always an `nsIDocShell` and as part of
porting `OnStateChange` and `OnLocationChange` events from
`WebProgressChild`/`RemoteWebProgress` to `BrowserChild`/`BrowserParent`, this
informations needs to be available from the `BrowserChild`. As it stands, it is
currently an expando property on the `WebProgressChild`.
Instead of introducing yet another XPCOM interface for the WebProgressChild, we
now store this information directly on the `nsDocShell`. Furthermore, instead
of having the `WebNavigationChild` manage this part of the `nsDocShell`'s
state, we can have the `nsDocShell` manage this state itself so it is always
consistent.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D28124
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Still having lots of issues with tests failing, but need to get this
landed for various reasons. Followup to pref on at Bug 1550571.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D30563
We shouldn't be creating browsing contexts in chrome. Add
assertion (behind pref that guards the rest of this patch set) to make
sure that doesn't happen.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D30561
In order to not have detach called on non-existent BrowsingContexts,
we need to hold browsing contexts alive until the lifetime of
ContentChild has ended.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D29782
When changing processes and therefore destroying/rebuilding
frameloaders, add ability to keep the browsing context around and add
it to the new frameloader.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D26267
If an XPIDL interface has a method or attribute that is [notxpcom],
then it is implicitly treated as [builtinclass], even if it is not
marked as such. For clarity, this patch goes through and marks every
place that relies on this behavior (aside from some test code).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D30714
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
`nsIDocumentStateListener` is a scriptable interface and each method may run
any script. So, we should mark them as `can_run_script`. Then, we need to
mark a lot of editing methods because we need to mark
`EditorBase::EndTransactionInternal()` and `EditorBase::DoTransactionInternal()`
as `MOZ_CAN_RUN_SCRIPT`.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D30360
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This is essentially equal to restoring cached children and removing
current children from a BrowsingContext, which is the correct
behaviour. It would've been better if the current children were
removed in a more transparent manner, but it is more important to
remove an assert that too eagerly triggers.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D29945
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
