- `Array.map` becomes `Array.from`
- Array copying via `Array.slice` becomes `Array.from`.
- `Array.forEach` that did not rely on closures becomes `for`-`of` loops.
- Anything else: `Array.X` becomes `Array.prototype.X`.
Complex cases:
dom/bindings/test/TestInterfaceJS.js and
dom/bindings/test/test_exception_options_from_jsimplemented.html
use `Array.indexOf` to generate an error with a specific error message.
Switched to `Array.prototype.forEach` to generate the same error.
js/src/jit-test/tests/basic/exception-column-number.js
In this test `Array.indexOf()` is used to generate an error. Since the
exact message doesn't matter, I switched to `Array.from()`.
Intentionally not changed:
editor/libeditor/tests/browserscope/lib/richtext/richtext/js/range.js
Did not modify because this is 3rd-party code and the code uses
feature detection as a fall back when Array generics are not used.
testing/talos/talos/tests/dromaeo/lib/mootools.js
Did not modify because mootools adds the `Array.slice` method to the
`Array` object.
Not changed because they check the implementation of Array generics:
js/src/jit-test/tests/basic/arrayNatives.js
js/src/jit-test/tests/basic/bug563243.js
js/src/jit-test/tests/basic/bug618853.js
js/src/jit-test/tests/basic/bug830967.js
js/src/jit-test/tests/jaeger/recompile/bug656753.js
js/src/jit-test/tests/self-hosting/alternate-static-and-instance-array-extras.js
js/src/tests/non262/Array/generics.js
js/src/tests/non262/Array/regress-415540.js
js/src/tests/non262/extensions/regress-355497.js
js/src/tests/non262/extensions/typedarray-set-neutering.js
Depends on D27802
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D27803
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
If we have an animation with multiple transform-like properties, it
seems getOMTAStyle(transform) returns an empty string at 50% on
Android x86_64 opt with e10s, so we cannot pass this test case. We
temporarily disable this test case on this platform.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D24103
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This also adds the missing preference in test_transition_per_property.html.
Depends on D22567
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D22568
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
The GeckoView test app doesn't handle visited link history, so disable
a couple tests that rely on that.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D17698
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
But some test cases are skipped, they will be enabled in bug 1456679.
MozReview-Commit-ID: HLxPjkf6KjY
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 55c24d34a53423a921060a431ac941b068407eb9
The Firefox fired excessive animationiteration event.
But We fixed specification in order to prevent firing the animationiteration when animation is start.
For detail, See https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/68
MozReview-Commit-ID: 391DRxSpq86
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 38e6710da4d9ad7422d6313eeae2803402a51b24
If all of animations on an element are paused, finished or zero playback rate,
we don't send those animations to the compositor.
Also in this change, we send zero active duration animations to the compositor
in the same way as normail animations.
MozReview-Commit-ID: CHjv6Buy5fa
To send animations to compositor in the delay phase we need to
modify Animation::IsPlaying returning true in the delay phase.
Note about background-position-in-delay.html:
After this patch, background-position animation also creates an active layer
from its delay phase.
Also note about test cases in test_animations_omta.html:
After landing bug 1279071, getOMTAStyle() returns the style value only
specified by animations, also in this patch we don't apply any opacity or
transform values in the delay phase, as a result we can't tell animating
value during delay phase on the compositor.
MozReview-Commit-ID: ILYKig3c08d
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 5715c1f9ec43da3c8374f08cdca82e2ca29fe474
When requesting restyles we take special care to detect when an animation has
newly finished so we perform the necessary restyle to represent the fill state.
However, we should really explicitly pull the animation off the layer at this
point by requesting a layer update. (That is, when an animation is
newly-finished we should use RestyleType::Layer instead of
RestyleType::Standard. Currently we just use RestyleType::Standard.)
In this bug we plan to move restyle requests down to the effect (since it is
the *effect* that is restyled). However, only the Animation has the notion of
"finished" or not so we detect this particular case in the Animation and
request the layer update there. We already request layer updates in the
Animation for other situations such as pausing so doing *layer* updates in the
Animation and regular restyles in the effect is not inconsistent.
This patch also tweaks test_animations_omta.html since it was previously
erroneously testing that a finished animation was still running on the
compositor.
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 3cd1abe2a10370e90cde64b4b42b27326082f6f0
This patch updates the logic in nsTransitionManager::FlushTransitions that deals
with detecting newly-started (i.e. when the delay phase has just finished) or
newly-finished animations. The existing logic had the following behavior:
* Calling SetIsFinishedTransition for newly-finished transitions.
This is no longer needed since by this point all consumers of
IsFinishedTransition have been updated to use alternative means for testing
if an animation is relevant.
* Setting transitionStartedOrEnded to true so that we would post an animation
restyle.
We can achieve this same effect by simplying updating the canThrottleTick
flag using the result of calling Animation::CanThrottle on each animation.
Animation::CanThrottle will return false for a newly-started or
newly-finished animation (it returns false for a newly-started animation
since the animation's mIsRunningOnCompositor flag won't yet be true at that
point.)
* Updating the animation generation for newly-started and newly-finished
animations in order to trigger a layer update.
At least that appears to be the intention of this code. However, it currently
has no effect since the animation generation on the pres context is not
incremented in any context I could find where a newly started/finished
animation might be detected.
For this third case, this patch adds tests to ensure that transitions are
correctly added and removed from the compositor when they start and finish.
This is because most of the existing tests in test_animations_omta.html cover
only CSS animations.
As noted in the comments in the test, if a tick lands at the exact beginning of
a transition we will typically not send it to the layer until the following tick
because the RestyleManager will filter out the seemingly redundant change (i.e.
no change to the computed style). Presumably updating the animation generation
was intended to avoid this.
This same behavior is true of CSS animations (and the same kind of comment
appears elsewhere in test_animations_omta.html). Long-term this is probably
worth fixing so that when a transition is triggered we get it to the compositor
one tick earlier which should improve responsiveness when the main thread is
busy and the interval between ticks is long. Furthermore, we should do the same
for both all type of animations, not just transitions.
Currently, however, this patch preserves the existing behavior and helps narrow
the difference between transitions and animations so we can apply this
optimization to both.
AnimationCollection::HasAnimationOfProperty uses IsFinishedTransition to filter
out transitions that should otherwise be ignored. This is used in the following
places:
1. nsLayoutUtils::HasAnimations
The is only used by nsIFrame::BuildDisplayListForStackingContext to see if
there are any opacity animations
For this case, simply returning *current* animations would be sufficient
(since finished but filling animations should have already filled in the
display opacity)
2. CommonAnimationManager::GetAnimationsForCompositor
This should really only return *current* animations--that is, animations that
are running or scheduled to run. Finished animations never run on the
compositor. Indeed, only *playing* animations run on the compositor but, as
we will see in some of the cases below, it is sometimes useful to know that
an animation *will* run on the compositor in the near future (e.g. so we can
pre-render content).
The places where GetAnimationsForCompositor is used are:
- When building layers to add animations to layers in nsDisplayList--in this
case we skip any animations that aren't playing so if
GetAnimationsForCompositor only returned current animations that would be
more than sufficient.
- In nsLayoutUtils::HasAnimationsForCompositor. This in turn is used:
- In ChooseScaleAndSetTransform to see if the transform is being animated
on the compositor. If so, it calls
nsLayoutUtils::ComputeSuitableScaleForAnimation (which also calls
GetAnimationsForCompositor) and passes the result to
GetMinAndMaxScaleForAnimationProperty which we have already adjusted in
part 4 of this patch series to only deal with *relevant* animations
Relevant animations include both current animations and in effect
animations but we don't run forwards-filling animations on the compositor
so GetAnimationsForCompositor should NOT return them. Current animations
should be enough. In fact, playing animations should be enough but we
might want to pre-render layers at a suitable size during their delay
phase so returning current animations is probably ok.
- In nsDisplayListBuilder::MarkOutOfFlowFrameForDisplay to add a fuzz
factor to the overflow rect for frames undergoing a transform animation
on the compositor. In this case too current animations should be
sufficient.
- In nsDisplayOpacity::NeedsActiveLayer to say "yes" if we are animating
opacity on the compositor. Presumably in this case it would be good to
say "yes" if the animation is in the delay phase too (as it currently
does). After the animation is finished, we should drop the layer, i.e.
current animations should be sufficient.
- In nsDisplayTransform::ShouldPrerenderTransformedContent. As with
nsDisplayOpacity::NeedsActiveLayer, we only need to pre-render
transformed content for animations that are current.
- In nsDisplayTransform::GetLayerState. As with
nsDisplayOpacity::NeedsActiveLayer, we only need to return active here
for current animations.
- In nsIFrame::IsTransformed. Here we test the display style to see if
there is a transform and also check if transform is being animated on the
compositor. As a result, we really only need HasAnimationsForCompositor
to return true for animations that are playing--otherwise the display
style will tell us if we're transformed or not. Returning true for all
current compositor animations (which is a superset of playing), however,
should not cause problems (we already return true for even more than
that).
- In nsIFrame::HasOpacityInternal which is much the same as
nsIFrame::IsTransformed and hence current should be fine.
3. AnimationCollection::CanThrottleAnimation
Here, HasAnimationOfProperty is used when looking for animations that would
disqualify us from throttling the animation by having an out-of-date layer
generation or being a transform animation that affects scroll and so requires
that we do the occasional main thread sample to update scrollbars.
It would seem like current animations are enough here too. One interesting
case is where we *had* a compositor animation but it has finished or been
cancelled. In that case, the animation won't be current and we should not
throttle the animation since we need to take it off its layer.
It turns out checking for current animations is still ok in this case too.
The reasoning is as follows:
- If the animation is newly-finished, we'll pick that up in
Animation::CanThrottle and return false then.
- If the animation is newly-idle then there are two cases:
If the cancelled animation was the only compositor animation then
AnimationCollection::CanPerformOnCompositorThread will notice that there
are no playing compositor animations and return false and
AnimationCollection::CanThrottleAnimation will never be called.
If there are other compositor animations running, then
AnimationCollection::CanThrottleAnimation will still return false because
whatever cancelled the animation will update the animation generation and
we'll notice the mismatch between the layer animation generation and the
animation generation on the collection.
Based on the above analysis it appears that making
AnimationCollection::HasAnimationOfProperty return only current animations (and
simulatneously renaming it to HasCurrentAnimationOfProperty) is safe. Indeed, in
effect, we already do this for transitions but not for animations. This patch
generalizes this behavior to all animations.
This patch also updates test_animations_omta.html since it was incorrectly
testing that a finished opacity animation was still running on the compositor.
Finished animations should not run on the compositor and the changes in this
patch cause that to happen. The reason we don't just update this test to check
for RunningOn.MainThread is that for opacity animations, unlike transform
animations, we can't detect if an opacity on a layer was set by animation or
not. As a result, for opacity animations we typically test the opacity on
either the main thread or compositor in order to allow for the case where an
animation-set opacity is still lingering on the compositor.
This patch (after stepping through the call graph) affects the following
places:
* CommonAnimationManager::GetAnimationsForCompositor, which is used
only by nsDisplayListBuilder::AddAnimationsAndTransitionsToLayer,
which already checks the individual animations (so really no change)
* AnimationPlayerCollection::CanThrottleAnimation
* ActiveLayerTracker::IsStyleAnimated
* nsLayoutUtils::HasAnimationsForCompositor
* nsLayoutUtils::HasAnimations (which is used only to check whether we
can make the 0-opacity optimization)
I believe it makes sense to change all of these locations (although in
the long term we want to throttle (or similar) more animations).
Without this patch, I believe we're forcing the creation of an opacity
layer because we think we have animations to send to it.
This is the main patch for the bug; it makes us use the mechanism added
in bug 1125455 to avoid sending animations that aren't currently
applying to the compositor.
Patch 7 is needed to make this code rerun in all the cases where we need
to rerun it, though.
This patch contains two changes:
(1) The addition of refVisitedLink and the use of
waitForVisitedLinkColoring() on it.
(2) Changing the URL of the visited lisks (both visitedLink and
refVisitedLink) from "" to window.top.location.href, since the
former doesn't work for Android mochitests while it does work on
Linux mochitest-e10s.
I tested locally that without the patch I get the failures, and with the
patch the failures go away, using:
./mach mochitest-plain --e10s --setpref layers.acceleration.force-enabled=true --setpref layers.offmainthreadcomposition.async-animations=true layout/style/test/test_animations_omta.html
Further, when running (and passing), I checked that
waitForVisitedLinkColoring() does go through one setTimeout cycle.
Also, I tested that if I effectively revert
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/d13154302d77 by changing the
third parameter to the GetContext call in
nsStyleSet::ResolveStyleWithReplacement to be nullptr instead of
visitedRuleNode, I get the failure:
TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | layout/style/test/test_animations_omta.html | visited link background color after animation-only flush - got rgb(255, 255, 0), expected rgb(0, 0, 255)
which confirms that the test is still testing what it was designed to
test.
Note that (at this stage) some of the tests in both files fail (which I
have verified locally), as noted by the todos and FIXMEs in the test,
which will be removed in later patches in this bug, as the failures are
fixed.
Note that (at this stage) some of the tests in both files fail (which I
have verified locally), as noted by the todos and FIXMEs in the test,
which will be removed in later patches in this bug, as the failures are
fixed.
Note that this means that when we start transitions, we post restyles
that are processed during the current restyling operation, rather than
in a later phase. This depends on patch 11, which makes the transition
manager skip style changes that it posts while starting transitions, to
ensure that this doesn't lead to an infinite loop. This also depends on
patch 16, which only consumes restyle data for the primary frame, to
ensure that the animation restyles posted are processed properly. It
also depends on patch 14, which makes us retain data on finished
transitions, to avoid triggering extra transitions on descendants when
both an ancestor and a descendant transition an inherited property, and
the descendant does so faster.
This fixes a known failure in layout/style/test/test_animations.html and
test_animations_omta.html (as visible in the patch). I believe this is
because this patch changes us to compute keyframe values for animations
on top of a style context *with* animation data rather than one without,
which means what we're computing them on top of changes each time. (The
purpose of patch 3 was to avoid this in the case where avoiding it
matters, i.e., implicit 0% and 100% keyframes.)
We use new_div, check_events etc. in a number of animation-related mochitests
and with this bug we'll want to use them in a few more. This patch factors them
out into animation_utils.js and tidies them up a little.
The added test passes locally on Linux with OMT compositing and OMT
animations enabled. However, it also passes without the patch because
the calls to FlushAnimations and FlushTransitions from
PresShell::FlushPendingNotifications cover up the damage done by bugs in
the animation-only style flush.
Unfortunately due to lack of global history on B2G and not running OMT
animations tests on any other platforms, the new test won't actually run
in automation right now.
This patch removes the check that skipped queueing events for animations
without keyframes since the spec indicates such animations should dispatch
events.
There is a further correctness fix here for the case where a keyframes rule
is modified using the CSSOM so that it becomes empty. Previously when we
came to create the new animation rules we would end up setting
ElementAnimations::mNeedRefreshes to false since we check if the keyframes
rule is empty and if it is we would skip all further processing (including
setting mNeedsRefreshes).
That means that:
(a) We may end up unregistering from the refresh observer so we would never
dispatch the end event for such an animation.
(b) If the animation was running on the compositor we may never remove it from
the compositor or may not do it in a timely fashion.
To fix both these problems, this patch removes the check for an empty keyframes
rule so that mNeedsRefreshes is set in this case.
This patch simply re-arranges the order of arguments to omta_is_approx so that
the delta sits along side the values being compared.
This, I think, makes more sense and also is more consistent when converting
tests from test_animations.html to test_animations_omta.html since the
"RunningOn" parameter is consistently inserted in the second-to-last position
just before the description for both omta_is and omta_is_approx.
This patch removes the line from new_div that forced a style flush. This was
very confusing because:
* It behaved differently to new_div in test_animations.html so copying tests
over was more complex (particularly when registering for events is involved).
* It meant after setting up initial style using new_div you could just call
waitForPaints but if you updated style using elem.style you'd need to call
waitForPaintsFlushed.
In adjusting test_animations_omta.html we are able to simplify the tests
somewhat. This patch also adds a few additional checks that waiting to update
the compositor does not produce different results.
This patch moves some test utility methods from test_animations_omta.html to
animation_utils.js. It also renames addAsyncTest to addAsyncAnimTest and
likewise for a few other methods.
