Behavior-wise this only removes the HasAttr(src) check, and adds the IsEmpty()
check to the alt attribute value, since this function is only called for <img>
and <input>.
But it also cleans up a bit.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D11194
Behavior-wise this only removes the HasAttr(src) check, and adds the IsEmpty()
check to the alt attribute value, since this function is only called for <img>
and <input>.
But it also cleans up a bit.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D11194
--HG--
extra : source : 803b224d52a0940b4fb4b3b9cffc6a1fa6e5d4ee
Behavior-wise this only removes the HasAttr(src) check, and adds the IsEmpty()
check to the alt attribute value, since this function is only called for <img>
and <input>.
But it also cleans up a bit.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D11194
This patch was written entirely by the following script:
#!/bin/bash
if [ ! -d "./.hg" ]
then
echo "Not in a source tree." 1>&2
exit 1
fi
find . -regex '.*\(ref\|crash\)test.*\.list' | while read FILENAME
do
echo "Processing ${FILENAME}."
# The following has four substitutions:
# * The first one replaces the *first* argument to fuzzy() when it doesn't
# have a - in it, by replacing it with an explicit 0-N range.
# * The second one does the same for the *second* argument to fuzzy().
# * The third does the same for the *second* argument to fuzzy-if().
# * The fourth does the same for the *third* argument to fuzzy-if().
#
# Note that this is using perl rather than sed because perl doesn't
# support non-greedy matching, which is needed for the first argument to
# fuzzy-if.
perl -pi -e 's/(fuzzy\()([^ ,()-]*)(,[^ ,()]*\))/${1}0-${2}${3}/g;s/(fuzzy\([^ ,()]*,)([^ ,()-]*)(\))/${1}0-${2}${3}/g;s/(fuzzy-if\([^ ]*?,)([^ ,()-]*)(,[^ ,()]*\))/${1}0-${2}${3}/g;s/(fuzzy-if\([^ ]*?,[^ ,()]*,)([^ ,()-]*)(\))/${1}0-${2}${3}/g' "${FILENAME}"
done
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2974
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
The clip chain API in webrender allows us to build the clip state in WR
so that it matches the gecko display list more closely. This patch throws
away ScrollingLayersHelper.* and introduces ClipManager.* which pushes
the clip state to WR using the new method. A quick summary of the new
method is below.
Each display item in gecko has a DisplayItemClipChain which is a chain
of individual clips. The individual clips are defined in WR, and the
clip ids for those clips are put into a WR clip chain using the new
define_clip_chain API. Furthermore, each clip chain can also have a
parent chain, which is used to link a DisplayItemClipChain to the parent
display item's DisplayItemClipChain. This allows the WR clip state to
closely match the structure of the gecko display list clip state,
resulting in more correct behaviour.
There are a few other major changes that are lumped into this patch and
that were tricky to separate into their own patches:
- The collapsing of WrScrollId and WrStickyId into WrClipId. On the WR
side all the clip ids are treated the same anyway. Trying to preserve
the arbitrary distinction on the gecko side was resulting in
increasingly convoluted code, with different kinds of Variant<..>
types in the method signatures. It was much simpler and resulted in a
bunch of code deletion to just collapse the types.
- Moving the "override" mechanism from WebRenderAPI to ClipManager. The
override mechanism (explained in ClipManager.h) was simplified by
moving it into ClipManager, because it removed the need for tracking
additional clip stack state in WebRenderAPI.
MozReview-Commit-ID: GGbdFyJGprK
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : baa56ff179e917b0ab5a5c186a3a415761f8050a
Many of these could probably be fuzzed but in the interests of getting
the reftest suite turned on sooner I'm doing a blanket fails-if. This
covers all the reftests where there is more fuzz with webrender on
windows than any of existing annotations account for. In some cases the
fuzz is only a few pixels more than the equivalent Linux fuzz already
annotated, but I'll clean that up in a future bug.
MozReview-Commit-ID: IaKarbnL46d
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 71889340305b0b12fa8eace722e42bb3faf14419
All of these tests have existing fuzzy annotations which cover the
differences in the WR renderings. Therefore we can remove the
fails-if(webrender) annotations and use the existing fuzzy annotations
to treat the tests as passing.
MozReview-Commit-ID: LFWha6gAP2r
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : b26a0d0cd66b6bab273251e6a2de9210417ba798
This patch:
- adds fails-if annotations for all the reftests that were consistently failing
with layers-free turned on.
- removes fails-if or reduces the range on fuzzy-if annotations for all
the reftests that were producing UNEXPECTED-PASS results with
layers-free turned on.
- adds skip-if, random-if, or fuzzy-if annotations to the reftests that
were intermittently failing due to timeout, obvious incorrectness, or
slight pixel differences, respectively.
MozReview-Commit-ID: A0Aknn6rnjj
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 420d9cf43f23a5d654fa36eec69138937d13c173
Skip tests that are expected to fail in both Stylo and Gecko modes. They would unexpectedly "pass" in styloVsGecko mode when comparing the two failures, which is not a useful result.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 3mOpjU225Q1
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 22bb5d4e3c5138ef832995eaf5716824f4707ffe
extra : source : d40fb20c9a49d0797c0eeae613a04912b12a28f7
