Looks like an oversight from all the way back to bug 806506.
Depends on D48538
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D48539
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
People keep adding useless null-checks and it was not clear what the consensus
was from bug 1441165, but this should be unobjectionable I guess.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D46781
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
People keep adding useless null-checks and it was not clear what the consensus
was from bug 1441165, but this should be unobjectionable I guess.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D46781
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
I need this to make style invalidation work with Shadow Parts in a way that's
fast. If something in the ancestor shadow root or any of its ancestor changes,
that makes a ::part() selector change, I don't want to walk the whole shadow
tree over and over in order to find the parts that I need to restyle.
Unfortunately we cannot just use the mutation observer setup from ShadowRoot
since, unlike for slotted elements, there's no restriction of where a part can
appear in the shadow tree.
That means that the regular nsIMutationObserver notifications don't quite cut
it, since we'd get notified only of subtree roots and we'd need to tree-walk
around in order to figure out if we have any new part.
I thought that I was going to be able to share more code with other bits if I
moved them away from nsIMutationObserver, thus bug 1554498, but in the end it
was not the case, so here's the "without bug 1554498" version of the patch.
The patch on top of that bug (that as I mention in the commit message I'm
ambivalent about whether we should land or not) should be pretty similar either
way.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32641
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Because it states more clearly what the functions and the constant are
about.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D31615
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Additionally, this patch makes `nsContentUtils::DispatchXULCommand()` because
it guarantees the lifetime of **only** `PresShell` in it. So, we need to check
the lifetime of each argument at each caller here.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D29199
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
The change to the EventTargetChainItem constructor is because we're changing mTarget to be const (to avoid taking extra stack refs to the EventTarget), so have to set it in the constructor instead of setting it after creating the object.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D25813
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
It won't change then, even when removed from the UA Widget. It also gives us an
extra node bit.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D20560
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Summary: Really sorry for the size of the patch. It's mostly automatic
s/nsIDocument/Document/ but I had to fix up in a bunch of places manually to
add the right namespacing and such.
Overall it's not a very interesting patch I think.
nsDocument.cpp turns into Document.cpp, nsIDocument.h into Document.h and
nsIDocumentInlines.h into DocumentInlines.h.
I also changed a bunch of nsCOMPtr usage to RefPtr, but not all of it.
While fixing up some of the bits I also removed some unneeded OwnerDoc() null
checks and such, but I didn't do anything riskier than that.
Add a WindowProxyHolder type and generate binding code that takes or returns it whenever
the WebIDL refers to the WindowProxy type. This patch just makes the WindowProxyHolder
hold a strong reference to a nsPIDOMWindowOuter.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D12650
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
There's a few subtle behavior changes here, which I'll try to break down in the
commit message.
The biggest one is the EditableDescendantCount stuff going away. This
was added in bug 1181130, to prevent clicking on the non-editable div from
selecting the editable div inside. This is problematic for multiple reasons:
* First, I don't think non-editable regions of an editable element should
be user-select: all.
* Second, it just doesn't work in Shadow DOM (the editable descendant count is
not kept up-to-date when not in the uncomposed doc), so nested
contenteditables behave differently inside vs. outside a Shadow Tree.
* Third, I think it's user hostile to just entirely disable selection if you
have a contenteditable descendant as a child of a user-select: all thing.
WebKit behaves like this patch in the following test-case (though not Blink):
https://crisal.io/tmp/user-select-all-contenteditable-descendant.html
Edge doesn't seem to support user-select: all at all (no pun intended).
But we don't allow to select anything at all which looks wrong.
* Fourth, it's not tested at all (which explains how we broke it in Shadow DOM
and not even notice...).
In any case I've verified that this doesn't regress the editor from that bug. If
this regresses anything we can fix it as outlined in the first bullet point
above, which should also make us more compatible with other UAs in that
test-case.
The other change is `all` not overriding everything else. So, something like:
<div style="-webkit-user-select: all">All <div style="-webkit-user-select: none">None</div></div>
Totally ignores the -webkit-user-select: none declaration in Firefox before this
change. This doesn't match any other UA nor the spec, and this patch aligns us
with WebKit / Blink.
This in turn makes us not need -moz-text anymore, whose only purpose was to
avoid this.
This also fixes a variety of bugs uncovered by the previous changes, like the
SetIgnoreUserModify(false) call in editor being completely useless, since
presShell->SetCaretEnabled ended in nsCaret::SetVisible, which overrode it.
This in turn uncovered even more bugs, from bugs in the caret painting code,
like not checking -moz-user-modify on the right frame if you're the last frame
of a line, to even funnier bits where before this patch you show the caret but
can't write at all...
In any case, the new setup I came up with is that when you're editing (the
selection is focused on an editable node) moving the caret forces it to end up
in an editable node, thus jumping over non-editable ones.
This has the nice effect of not completely disabling selection of
-moz-user-select: all elements that have editable descendants (which was a very
ad-hoc hack for bug 1181130, and somewhat broken per the above), and also
not needing the -moz-user-select: all for non-editable bits in contenteditable.css
at all.
This also fixes issues with br-skipping like not being able to insert content in
the following test-case:
<div contenteditable="true"><span contenteditable="false">xyz </span><br>editable</div>
If you start moving to the left from the second line, for example.
I think this yields way better behavior in all the relevant test-cases from bug
1181130 / bug 1109968 / bug 1132768, shouldn't cause any regression, and the
complexity is significantly reduced in some places.
There's still some other broken bits that this patch doesn't fix, but I'll file
follow-ups for those.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D12687
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
There's a few subtle behavior changes here, which I'll try to break down in the
commit message.
The biggest one is the EditableDescendantCount stuff going away. This
was added in bug 1181130, to prevent clicking on the non-editable div from
selecting the editable div inside. This is problematic for multiple reasons:
* First, I don't think non-editable regions of an editable element should
be user-select: all.
* Second, it just doesn't work in Shadow DOM (the editable descendant count is
not kept up-to-date when not in the uncomposed doc), so nested
contenteditables behave differently inside vs. outside a Shadow Tree.
* Third, I think it's user hostile to just entirely disable selection if you
have a contenteditable descendant as a child of a user-select: all thing.
WebKit behaves like this patch in the following test-case (though not Blink):
https://crisal.io/tmp/user-select-all-contenteditable-descendant.html
Edge doesn't seem to support user-select: all at all (no pun intended).
But we don't allow to select anything at all which looks wrong.
* Fourth, it's not tested at all (which explains how we broke it in Shadow DOM
and not even notice...).
In any case I've verified that this doesn't regress the editor from that bug. If
this regresses anything we can fix it as outlined in the first bullet point
above, which should also make us more compatible with other UAs in that
test-case.
The other change is `all` not overriding everything else. So, something like:
<div style="-webkit-user-select: all">All <div style="-webkit-user-select: none">None</div></div>
Totally ignores the -webkit-user-select: none declaration in Firefox before this
change. This doesn't match any other UA nor the spec, and this patch aligns us
with WebKit / Blink.
This in turn makes us not need -moz-text anymore, whose only purpose was to
avoid this.
This also fixes a variety of bugs uncovered by the previous changes, like the
SetIgnoreUserModify(false) call in editor being completely useless, since
presShell->SetCaretEnabled ended in nsCaret::SetVisible, which overrode it.
This in turn uncovered even more bugs, from bugs in the caret painting code,
like not checking -moz-user-modify on the right frame if you're the last frame
of a line, to even funnier bits where before this patch you show the caret but
can't write at all...
In any case, the new setup I came up with is that when you're editing (the
selection is focused on an editable node) moving the caret forces it to end up
in an editable node, thus jumping over non-editable ones.
This has the nice effect of not completely disabling selection of
-moz-user-select: all elements that have editable descendants (which was a very
ad-hoc hack for bug 1181130, and somewhat broken per the above), and also
not needing the -moz-user-select: all for non-editable bits in contenteditable.css
at all.
This also fixes issues with br-skipping like not being able to insert content in
the following test-case:
<div contenteditable="true"><span contenteditable="false">xyz </span><br>editable</div>
If you start moving to the left from the second line, for example.
I think this yields way better behavior in all the relevant test-cases from bug
1181130 / bug 1109968 / bug 1132768, shouldn't cause any regression, and the
complexity is significantly reduced in some places.
There's still some other broken bits that this patch doesn't fix, but I'll file
follow-ups for those.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D12687
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Various places in dom/ use the pattern:
already_AddRefed<NodeInfo> ni = ...;
which is supposed to be disallowed by our static analysis code, but
isn't, for whatever reason. To fix our static analysis code, we need to
eliminate instances of the above pattern.
Unfortunately, eliminating this pattern requires restructuring how Nodes
are created. Most Node subclasses take `already_AddRefed<NodeInfo>&` in
their constructors, and a few accept `already_AddRefed<NodeInfo>&&`. We
need to enforce the latter pattern consistently, which requires changing
dozens of source files.
While trying to repro bug 1484293 I noticed that this assertion failed:
https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/ef8b3886cb173d5534b954b6fb7eb2d94a9473d0/dom/base/ShadowRoot.cpp#160
(during unlink, while unbinding the kids)
We rely on GetComposedDoc returning the right thing during unbind to cleanup
some stuff (see bug 1473637 for example), so it should probably be correct all
the time, regardless of whether something is unlinked or not.
Also this makes GetComposedDoc() much faster, which is nice too, since we call
it somewhat often.
I removed NodeHasRelevantHoverRules, since it's unused (was used by the old
style system).
I moved the SetIsConnected(false) call for the shadow root to before unbinding
the kids for consistency with what Element does with the uncomposed doc flag,
now that the children's connectedness doesn't depend on the shadow root's.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D3715
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
While trying to repro bug 1484293 I noticed that this assertion failed:
https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/ef8b3886cb173d5534b954b6fb7eb2d94a9473d0/dom/base/ShadowRoot.cpp#160
(during unlink, while unbinding the kids)
We rely on GetComposedDoc returning the right thing during unbind to cleanup
some stuff (see bug 1473637 for example), so it should probably be correct all
the time, regardless of whether something is unlinked or not.
Also this makes GetComposedDoc() much faster, which is nice too, since we call
it somewhat often.
I removed NodeHasRelevantHoverRules, since it's unused (was used by the old
style system).
I moved the SetIsConnected(false) call for the shadow root to before unbinding
the kids for consistency with what Element does with the uncomposed doc flag,
now that the children's connectedness doesn't depend on the shadow root's.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D3715
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
The DOM elements within the UA Widget Shadow DOM should have its reflectors in
the UA Widget Scope. This is done by calling nsINode::IsInUAWidget() which
would check its containing shadow and its UA Widget bit.
To prevent JS access of the DOM element before it is in the
UA Widget Shadom DOM tree, various DOM methods are set to inaccessible to
UA Widget script. It would need to use the two special methods in ShadowRoot
instead to insert the DOM directly into the shadow tree.
MozReview-Commit-ID: Jz9iCaVIoij
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : b7b17be68dcde00cfeb207cb39cf16b486f2ab02
