This will make it easier to adapt to IPC.
The trickiest part here was to make script tasks spawn new layout tasks
directly instead of having the pipeline do it for them. The latter
approach will not work in multiprocess mode, because layout and script
must run in the same address space and the pipeline cannot inject tasks
into another process.
r? @larsbergstrom
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: e06eaa0064f49bc215e3851f0a3686e1191b356a
This was the preferred pattern between the deprecation of Vec::from_elem and
the addition of the count argument to the vec![] macro.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 556c0e1509cb48b90f492bcf0f25d0ed14b015d1
This removes the possibility of a panic by checking a constraint at compile
time rather than at run time.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: d7cf58d6f15c1b96884a5aef210a5c5d244abf54
I found them helpful; I imagine others might as well.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 9e02ef93478c41a3fc6971611b358da6f73625d6
Recently, I found myself reading through the Python codegen scripts that
live in 'components/script/dom/bindings/*' and noticed that there were
many tidy violations: unnecessary semicolons, weird spacing, unused
variables, lack of license headers, etc. Considering these files are now
living in our tree and mostly maintained directly by contributors of
Servo (as opposed to being from upstream), I feel these files should not
be excluded from our normal tidy process. This commit removes the
blacklist on these files and fixes all tidy violations.
I added these subdirectories to the blacklist because they appear to be
maintained upstream somewhere else:
* "components/script/dom/bindings/codegen/parser/*",
* "components/script/dom/bindings/codegen/ply/*",
Also, I added a few '# noqa' comments which tells us to ignore the
flake8 errors for that line; they are mostly for unused/undefined
variables. I chose to ignore these (instead of fixing them) to make the
work for this commit simpler for me.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 2d2a340633dcc73e458a8454b78e26ba93511d37
Since I made unsafe code opt-in in layout, the unsafe code in this module has
been reduced to a single unsafe impl, so there is no reason to allow it in
the entire module.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: ce81745a8ece10a81b3caaf80da41d7824c5105a
Now that NativeDisplay can be shared between the compositor and the
paint task, we can move the LayerBuffer cache to the compositor. This
allows surfaces to be potentially reused between different paint tasks
and will eventually allow OpenGL contexts to be preserved between
instances of GL rasterization.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 10b0d8c537c226400a617d28e8a060f9ca53d242
--HG--
rename : servo/components/gfx/buffer_map.rs => servo/components/compositing/buffer_map.rs
My previous attempt (1303dd6e2e1af39b13b57986f154a67f9e7490e7) was foiled by
a typo that made the requirement only apply to the next item.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 5386b0122c52a2e869065676d46b242a4ddd1726
Fixes jumpiness on lots of Web sites.
r? @mbrubeck
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: bbcd42773342a587a8515f34bdc3ca69a380c0a8
This fixes the panic by rebasing #6189, and also makes cached messages appear once more.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: c04b7bbf6e5efe2e5217b69c9680e4e91bbd6ecd
I wrote this patch that makes the test from #6542 render as expected but I am not confident it is actually the right fix. Should the padding be included in the 'ascent' metric for images, or am I just introducing a bug that happens to offset the one I'm trying to fix?
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0688488a7fd3caee423968b33d6c19d79f94d29a
I've tested this manually, by clicking on the "baz" in code like
```js
var a = document.body.appendChild(document.createElement("a"));
a.textContent = "bar ";
a.setAttribute("href", "http://www.yahoo.com");
var b = a.appendChild(document.createElement("a"));
b.textContent = "baz";
```
but I've not found a way to write an automated test.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 1618a9e73d662159ed36f35bca6ea36fa0e58d90
Remove an unused import. This prevents a compiler warning in ```util```.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: a0db2cf1bb720130aabd0d755e9432bd17063740
This improves the encapsulation and consistency in our WebGL
implementation.
Also allows to implement new methods such as `getShaderSource()`.
It will also allow us to use `delete()` in the destructors of them (note
that we will probably want to keep track of them from the context before).
Some concerns:
**Trait method repetition**:
I'm aware that the traits `WebGL{Buffer,Renderbuffer,Framebuffer,Texture}Helpers` are basically the same, but `delete()` and `id()` methods are everywhere. I've thought something like:
```rust
pub trait WebGLIdentifiable {
type WebGLId; // id is sometimes i32 (see WebGLUniformLocation)
fn id(&self) -> Self::WebGLId;
}
pub trait WebGLBindable {
fn bind(&self);
}
pub trait WebGLDeletable {
fn delete(&self);
}
```
But I'd want to know your opinion first.
**`renderer` repetition**:
Thought of moving the field: `renderer: Sender<CanvasMsg>` to `WebGLObject`, but I think it makes it way more complicated to read, and also a bit unnecessary, at least IMO (`WebGLObject` will never interact with the field directly). It would also mean that all `WebGLObject`s should have one, which is true at this moment, but maybe not with WebGL 2, for example.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 0f8095b950dd144497919cfea65a1f154ed3ae9a
This allows us to get rid of the raw pointers and unsafe dereferencing in
the parallel layout implementation.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: a3821bf24094bf5bb2a9553e66b69da3b6430aa5
Reduces the size of `properties::cascade` from over 100K of code to
under 5K. Due to the improved I-cache utilization, improves ARM scaling
on 4 cores by 15%.
r? @SimonSapin (feel free to punt to someone else if you like)
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: 6386addb01dfec4bda38f99e534516ddf5ff77aa
I've never see it result in a speedup. Actually, I don't think I've seen
it result in anything better than a 50% slowdown. The arithmetic
intensity is just too low, at least with the current algorithm.
Parallel DL building can still be enabled with a debug flag if the
algorithm is improved.
r? @metajack
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: b876a54dce091e161b87340130446597dd864732
Didn't touch mozjs or rust-mozjs because implementing that in the code generator didn't seem too easy. I'm using the same workaround that the TextDecoder does.
Using the OsRng should be the right choice here? As the OS keeps state for us we wouldn't need to have a global rng instance to keep around.
Fixes#4666.
Source-Repo: https://github.com/servo/servo
Source-Revision: c0222628264423a67bf98775be83dcf2f85211ab
