DocShells are associated with outer DOM Windows, rather than Documents, so
having the getter on the document is a bit odd to begin with. But it's also
considerably less convenient, since most of the times when we want a docShell
from JS, we're dealing most directly with a window, and have to detour through
the document to get it.
MozReview-Commit-ID: LUj1H9nG3QL
--HG--
extra : source : fcfb99baa0f0fb60a7c420a712c6ae7c72576871
extra : histedit_source : 5be9b7b29a52a4b8376ee0bdfc5c08b12e3c775a
DocShells are associated with outer DOM Windows, rather than Documents, so
having the getter on the document is a bit odd to begin with. But it's also
considerably less convenient, since most of the times when we want a docShell
from JS, we're dealing most directly with a window, and have to detour through
the document to get it.
MozReview-Commit-ID: LUj1H9nG3QL
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : a13c59d1a5ed000187c7fd8e7339408ad6e2dee6
These issues were previously ignored due to the nature of our global import
rules. They need to be fixed before that rule can be updated.
MozReview-Commit-ID: DCChktTc5TW
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : cffb1c9762191c579d1397c8169e6e7635d229da
extra : histedit_source : dea59ddd2daaae52069c5faceae9149a4f08dd73
This removes some discovery pane tests which are obsolete. The discovery pane
page that it tests uses InstallTrigger, rather than mozAddonManager as we use
in production, and fails when used with WebExtensions.
The other tests have been updated to use WebExtensions, and some relevant
PopupNotifications bugs have been fixed so that they actually pass.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 1g0n73vhncp
--HG--
rename : toolkit/mozapps/extensions/test/browser/addons/browser_dragdrop1/install.rdf => toolkit/mozapps/extensions/test/browser/addons/browser_dragdrop1/manifest.json
rename : toolkit/mozapps/extensions/test/browser/addons/browser_dragdrop2/install.rdf => toolkit/mozapps/extensions/test/browser/addons/browser_dragdrop2/manifest.json
rename : toolkit/mozapps/extensions/test/browser/addons/browser_dragdrop_incompat/install.rdf => toolkit/mozapps/extensions/test/browser/addons/browser_dragdrop_incompat/manifest.json
extra : rebase_source : 0334268d0476227d084fb81bc8455deb186e6bd1
As described in the bug, this is intended as a temporary solution to
enable some experiments. If this becomes a real feature, UX will
put some thought into a better startup experience.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 4DGMHj29M3e
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : a108fd58d4703c3110790f99e4936e6fee323cd2
This patch was autogenerated by my decomponents.py
It covers almost every file with the extension js, jsm, html, py,
xhtml, or xul.
It removes blank lines after removed lines, when the removed lines are
preceded by either blank lines or the start of a new block. The "start
of a new block" is defined fairly hackily: either the line starts with
//, ends with */, ends with {, <![CDATA[, """ or '''. The first two
cover comments, the third one covers JS, the fourth covers JS embedded
in XUL, and the final two cover JS embedded in Python. This also
applies if the removed line was the first line of the file.
It covers the pattern matching cases like "var {classes: Cc,
interfaces: Ci, utils: Cu, results: Cr} = Components;". It'll remove
the entire thing if they are all either Ci, Cr, Cc or Cu, or it will
remove the appropriate ones and leave the residue behind. If there's
only one behind, then it will turn it into a normal, non-pattern
matching variable definition. (For instance, "const { classes: Cc,
Constructor: CC, interfaces: Ci, utils: Cu } = Components" becomes
"const CC = Components.Constructor".)
MozReview-Commit-ID: DeSHcClQ7cG
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : d9c41878036c1ef7766ef5e91a7005025bc1d72b
This was done using the following script:
37e3803c7a/processors/chromeutils-import.jsm
MozReview-Commit-ID: 1Nc3XDu0wGl
--HG--
extra : source : 12fc4dee861c812fd2bd032c63ef17af61800c70
extra : intermediate-source : 34c999fa006bffe8705cf50c54708aa21a962e62
extra : histedit_source : b2be2c5e5d226e6c347312456a6ae339c1e634b0
This was done using the following script:
37e3803c7a/processors/chromeutils-import.jsm
MozReview-Commit-ID: 1Nc3XDu0wGl
--HG--
extra : source : 12fc4dee861c812fd2bd032c63ef17af61800c70
This was done using the following script:
37e3803c7a/processors/chromeutils-import.jsm
MozReview-Commit-ID: 1Nc3XDu0wGl
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : c004a023389f1f6bf3d2f3efe93c13d423b23ccd
Currently, if an extension requests one or more optional permissions,
and those permissions do not cause a prompt to be displayed,
the framework will reject that request and not grant any permissions.
This should be the opposite in that we should grant permission to
those optional permissions event though no prompt is displayed.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 6SeyFSv92Lo
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 08ba28ca7920c9d37af28afa24d9602813b4470b
We are moving app menu doorhangers and badges out from window-
specific code into a jsm, in order to simplify the work that
the new app udpate UI has to do. Since browser-addons.js also
consumes the badge system, this ensures that it also uses the
jsm store.
MozReview-Commit-ID: Fb5Fsja0RcA
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : c979e361aba54692f89e79317e4958b65c8b4722
1. Use the right strings in permission dialogs
2. Don't show permissions dialogs for non-promptable permissions
3. Enable dialogs by default
MozReview-Commit-ID: JJdxxcP7IeU
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : b5525cbae3822f3e2727788fd63580e6d5bd8293
With this patch, permissions are not actually applied,
but the permissions api is in place.
MozReview-Commit-ID: CTaXz5sa1xy
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : d5cc18abbae6809b196f8497ff91608d662d5030
extra : source : e4c13d11e401ae3bd40be3a5a7fb0aaf95c992bb