This requires replacing inclusions of it with inclusions of more specific prefs
files.
The exception is that StaticPrefsAll.h, which is equivalent to StaticPrefs.h,
and is used in `Codegen.py` because doing something smarter is tricky and
suitable for a follow-up. As a result, any change to StaticPrefList.yaml will
still trigger recompilation of all the generated DOM bindings files, but that's
still a big improvement over trigger recompilation of every file that uses
static prefs.
Most of the changes in this commit are very boring. The only changes that are
not boring are modules/libpref/*, Codegen.py, and ServoBindings.toml.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D39138
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Fall back to using Google's DNS server to determine the associated local
addresses for web applications that are not loaded over the network. This
includes the loopback address, which is frequently used in the unit tests.
Provide a separate function for setting the target for the default local
address lookup.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D37331
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling specifies that the default route is the route
used to reach the origin rather than the one used to reach the internet, so
update the IP routing to reflect this. This addresses issues in which the
wrong IP address is used on machines with multiple network interfaces.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D36831
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This is what Chrome and Safari do.
See https://webcompat.com/issues/20701#issuecomment-436054739
So for exmaple, if there are two viewport meta tags like this;
<meta name="viewport" content="width=980">
<meta name="viewport" content="initial-scale=1,maximum-scale=1">
We will use "initial-scale=1,maximum-scale=1". Before this change we used to
use merged "width=980,initial-scale=1,maximum-scale=1".
Another example is to replace the content of a single viewport meta tag like this;
<meta id="viewport" name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
what will happen when this tag is replaced by below;
<meta id="viewport" name="viewport" content="width=1080">
We will use the replacing one (i.e. "width=1080"), before this change, we used
to use merged "width=1080,initial-scale=1".
As of this commit, we don't properly remove corresponding viewport meta data
when a) viewport meta tag is detached from document and b) `name` attribute is
changed from 'viewport'. These cases will be handled in subsequent commits.
Note that we no longer store invididual viewport meta data in Document::mHeaderData
so that nsIDOMWindowUtils.getDocumentMetadata doesn't work any more for the
invididual viewport meta data, but there is no use cases for them other than
two test cases which are removed in this commit.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D38922
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
We found there is a mp3 where the size is empty in its ID3 header, which makes mp3 parser think of that we haven't parsed the header yet, and then skip unnecessary bytes again and again.
We should use `Maybe` to know whether we finish parsing the size or not.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D39252
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
These files exist because they were the proof-of-concept first step for
splitting the static prefs header files. Now that those header files can be
generated from a script, we need to move the `accessibility.*` prefs into the
YAML file.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D39132
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This is what other browsers do, and it does make sense to me, it's useless to
try to scroll a frame with no scroll range in a given direction.
I think all callers of this function should be treated like this, so this is
more like a RFC / feedback request than a patch per se.
The wheel handling code already checks scroll range, so there's no difference of
behavior in that case, if I'm reading the code right.
There are a few other functions that check the result of
GetPerceivedScrollingDirections(), but I think if we change this we should
change this consistently.
I also think that if we do this we should rename the method to something like
GetAvailableScrollingDirections() or such.
Anyhow, wdyt? I should also add a test for this if we go with this.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D38991
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
The work from bug 1510569 that has ported the majority of the `nsIWebProgress`
event handlers from `WebProgressChild`/`RemoteWebProgress` to
`BrowserChild`/`BrowserParent` was not properly propogating the events in the
responsive design mode case. The `BrowserParent` assumed that its frame element
was an `nsIBrowser`, but in RDM it is an `<iframe mozbrowser>` which does not
implement `nsIBrowser`. In the RDM case we now walk up the document in the
`BrowserParent` tree to find the `<xul:browser>` and call the event handlers on
that instead.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D38916
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Now that the functionality we we wanted to preserve has been moved out of
XULDocument, we can start loading XUL files as XHTML. This will allow
the removal of XULDocument once we are confident that everything is working
correctly as XHTML.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D38694
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This is what other browsers do, and it does make sense to me, it's useless to
try to scroll a frame with no scroll range in a given direction.
I think all callers of this function should be treated like this, so this is
more like a RFC / feedback request than a patch per se.
The wheel handling code already checks scroll range, so there's no difference of
behavior in that case, if I'm reading the code right.
There are a few other functions that check the result of
GetPerceivedScrollingDirections(), but I think if we change this we should
change this consistently.
I also think that if we do this we should rename the method to something like
GetAvailableScrollingDirections() or such.
Anyhow, wdyt? I should also add a test for this if we go with this.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D38991
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This stops a potential race when multiple media playback threads attempt to
launch the RDD process and setup the IPC connections between
RemoteDecoderManager{Child|Parent} at the same time.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D39120
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
