Summary: Really sorry for the size of the patch. It's mostly automatic
s/nsIDocument/Document/ but I had to fix up in a bunch of places manually to
add the right namespacing and such.
Overall it's not a very interesting patch I think.
nsDocument.cpp turns into Document.cpp, nsIDocument.h into Document.h and
nsIDocumentInlines.h into DocumentInlines.h.
I also changed a bunch of nsCOMPtr usage to RefPtr, but not all of it.
While fixing up some of the bits I also removed some unneeded OwnerDoc() null
checks and such, but I didn't do anything riskier than that.
We want to get rid of JS_GetCompartmentPrincipals. The origin stored in CompartmentPrivate does not account for document.domain changes because that's a per-realm thing.
Fortunately we should not have waivers in any cases that involve document.domain.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D6035
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This will let us answer the following questions (in a performant way):
1) What's the compartment's origin? Necessary to implement compartment-per-origin.
2) What's the origin's site? Necessary for the new Wrap() algorithm.
3) Has any realm in the compartment set document.domain? Necessary for the new Wrap() algorithm.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D5423
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This patch creates the basic structure on how the widget scripts can be loaded
and be pointed to the Shadow Root, from the UAWidgetsChild.jsm.
The UAWidgetsClass class asks for a sandbox from Cu.getUAWidgetScope(), which
calls into XPCJSRuntime::GetUAWidgetScope(). It creates and keeps the
sandboxes, in a GCHashMap keyed to the origin, so we could reuse it if needed.
MozReview-Commit-ID: J6W4PDQWMcN
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : a62b0a22195f09cdb508df72c954e20d18c7bf68
The logic for choosing the principal here was originally written before
loadInfo had a separate principalToInherit field, and we needed to specify it
via the triggeringPrincipal instead. At that point, we had to choose a
component principal with permission to load the URI at the start of the
request.
However, now that we have a separate field for the principal to inherit, it's
only needed after access checks have passed and we know that we have a URI
which inherits a principal. In that case, the current logic causes us to
always inherit the first principal in the whitelist (which is the page
principal) for URIs (such as data: URIs) that always inherit, where we really
want to inherit the last (which is the extension principal).
MozReview-Commit-ID: EPoUNuOCwrH
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 535083e3dd4598ac4e8ea187d27d61ac2ac48476
We currently use plain extension codebase principals for most of the extension
stylesheets that we inject into content pages. Since we want the content
loaded by those stylesheets to be exempt from CSP, and can't safely use
expanded principals for their loads, we need to make plain extension codebase
principals exempt from CSP.
MozReview-Commit-ID: IIAUWU68nor
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : f7447e1d87c8d75b97de580a641fcac6333a9f27
There are several ways that expanded principals can be used as triggering
principals for requests. While that works fine for security checks, it also
sometimes causes them to be inherited, and used as result principals in
contexts where expanded principals aren't allowed.
This patch changes our inheritance behavior so that expanded principals are
downgraded to the most appropriate constituent principal when they would
otherwise be inherited.
The logic for choosing the most appropriate principal is a bit suspect, and
may eventually need to be changed to always select the last whitelist
principal, but I chose it to preserve the current principal downgrade behavior
used by XMLHttpRequest for the time being.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 9fvAKr2e2fa
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : c30df1b3851c11fed5a1d6a7fb158cec14933182
Per the CSP specification, content injected by extensions is meant to be
exempt from page CSP. This patch takes care of the most common case of content
injected by extension content scripts, which always have expanded principals
which inherit from the page principal.
In a follow-up, we'll probably need to extend the exemption to stylesheet
content loaded by extension codebase principals.
MozReview-Commit-ID: GlY887QAb5V
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 1371b4e4e7f330b7f7721d4aa169fcb52a7622d0
(Path is actually r=froydnj.)
Bug 1400459 devirtualized nsIAtom so that it is no longer a subclass of
nsISupports. This means that nsAtom is now a better name for it than nsIAtom.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 91U22X2NydP
--HG--
rename : xpcom/ds/nsIAtom.h => xpcom/ds/nsAtom.h
extra : rebase_source : ac3e904a21b8b48e74534fff964f1623ee937c67
This patch merges nsAtom into nsIAtom. For the moment, both names can be used
interchangeably due to a typedef. The patch also devirtualizes nsIAtom, by
making it not inherit from nsISupports, removing NS_DECL_NSIATOM, and dropping
the use of NS_IMETHOD_. It also removes nsIAtom's IIDs.
These changes trigger knock-on changes throughout the codebase, changing the
types of lots of things as follows.
- nsCOMPtr<nsIAtom> --> RefPtr<nsIAtom>
- nsCOMArray<nsIAtom> --> nsTArray<RefPtr<nsIAtom>>
- Count() --> Length()
- ObjectAt() --> ElementAt()
- AppendObject() --> AppendElement()
- RemoveObjectAt() --> RemoveElementAt()
- ns*Hashtable<nsISupportsHashKey, ...> -->
ns*Hashtable<nsRefPtrHashKey<nsIAtom>, ...>
- nsInterfaceHashtable<T, nsIAtom> --> nsRefPtrHashtable<T, nsIAtom>
- This requires adding a Get() method to nsRefPtrHashtable that it lacks but
nsInterfaceHashtable has.
- nsCOMPtr<nsIMutableArray> --> nsTArray<RefPtr<nsIAtom>>
- nsArrayBase::Create() --> nsTArray()
- GetLength() --> Length()
- do_QueryElementAt() --> operator[]
The patch also has some changes to Rust code that manipulates nsIAtom.
MozReview-Commit-ID: DykOl8aEnUJ
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 254404e318e94b4c93ec8d4081ff0f0fda8aa7d1
The extension policy services uses atoms internally for permission names, so
using them directly rather than strings is considerably cheaper.
MozReview-Commit-ID: Io8EuOXHKVy
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 577b4bdf7f899729e4cf92961a8e9e25bf886a72
Going through the extension policy service rather than using
WebExtensionPolicy objects directly adds a lot of unnecessary overhead to
common operations on extension principals, and also makes the code more
complicated than it needs to be.
We also use weak references to policy objects here, since principals should
ideally lose as much of their elevated privileges as possible once the
extension instance that created them has been destroyed (which is something we
couldn't handle easily when we simply tracked ID strings).
MozReview-Commit-ID: KDNvVdvLkIt
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 1b567919d2461bd0315d1a7d89f330cbd585f579
