We previously (in bug 1491235) adjusted some utility code to make
layout-contained frames behave as if they have no baseline.
But that's not sufficient. To make frames fully report lack-of-a-baseline,
we now do the following for layout-contained frames, as of this patch:
(a) We now leave the ReflowOutput outparam's BlockStartAscent member at its
default value (which is what we do for frames without a baseline like
e.g. nsCheckboxRadioFrame and nsHTMLCanvasFrame). And if the parent cares
about the baseline, it'll then ask directly, using a baseline getter.
(b) We now return 'false' in more implementations of bool-returning
baseline-getter-methods (where 'false' indicates 'no baseline').
(c) We now return the margin-box-bottom edge, in the nscoord-returning
'GetLogicalBaseline()' getter method. (We typically do this by deferring
to the inherited method, which ultimately comes from nsFrame's
implementation). It's appropriate to use the margin-box-bottom edge when
there's no baseline, per the definition of 'vertical-align: baseline',
here: https://drafts.csswg.org/css2/visudet.html#propdef-vertical-align
Depends on D32182
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32183
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
We previously (in bug 1491235) adjusted some utility code to make
layout-contained frames behave as if they have no baseline.
But that's not sufficient. To make frames fully report lack-of-a-baseline,
we now do the following for layout-contained frames, as of this patch:
(a) We now leave the ReflowOutput outparam's BlockStartAscent member at its
default value (which is what we do for frames without a baseline like
e.g. nsCheckboxRadioFrame and nsHTMLCanvasFrame). And if the parent cares
about the baseline, it'll then ask directly, using a baseline getter.
(b) We now return 'false' in more implementations of bool-returning
baseline-getter-methods (where 'false' indicates 'no baseline').
(c) We now return the margin-box-bottom edge, in the nscoord-returning
'GetLogicalBaseline()' getter method. (We typically do this by deferring
to the inherited method, which ultimately comes from nsFrame's
implementation). It's appropriate to use the margin-box-bottom edge when
there's no baseline, per the definition of 'vertical-align: baseline',
here: https://drafts.csswg.org/css2/visudet.html#propdef-vertical-align
Depends on D32182
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32183
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Additionally, this patch makes `nsFrame.h` stop including `nsIPresShell.h`
and makes each users include `mozilla/PresShell.h` instead. So, this improves
rebuild performance of `nsIPresShell.h` (and `mozilla/PresShell.h` in the
future).
Note that due to `nsIFrame::PresShell()`, `mozilla::` prefix is necessary for
`PresShell` in a lot of classes which are derived from `nsIFrame` even in
`.cpp` files.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D27476
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
- Remove expectation that 'preventScroll.html' fails.
- Use '[NoInterfaceObject] interface' workaround to simulate missing 'mixin' support.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D26922
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This is more consistent with what the Rust bits of the style system do, and
removes a pointer from ComputedStyle which is always nice.
This also aligns the Rust bits with the C++ bits re. not treating xul pseudos as
anonymous boxes. See the comment in nsTreeStyleCache.cpp regarding those.
Can't wait for XUL trees to die.
Depends on D19001
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D19002
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Summary: Really sorry for the size of the patch. It's mostly automatic
s/nsIDocument/Document/ but I had to fix up in a bunch of places manually to
add the right namespacing and such.
Overall it's not a very interesting patch I think.
nsDocument.cpp turns into Document.cpp, nsIDocument.h into Document.h and
nsIDocumentInlines.h into DocumentInlines.h.
I also changed a bunch of nsCOMPtr usage to RefPtr, but not all of it.
While fixing up some of the bits I also removed some unneeded OwnerDoc() null
checks and such, but I didn't do anything riskier than that.
This builds on bug 1428676 and introduces StyleAppearance, which replaces the
NS_THEME_* constants.
Really sorry for the size of the patch.
There's a non-trivial change in the gtk theme, which I submitted separately as
bug 1478385.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2361
MozReview-Commit-ID: DiSmMWK7Krp
It's not needed anymore, since we tag the pseudo-elements at creation time for
styling.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2330
MozReview-Commit-ID: 7j4DVEHXYIC
This patch basically does:
* remove StyleSetHandle and its corresponding files
* revisit #includes of related header files and change correspondingly
* change nsIPresShell::mStyleSet to be UniquePtr<ServoStyleSet>
* change the creating path of ServoStyleSet to pass UniquePtr
* change other mentions of StyleSetHandle to ServoStyleSet*
* remove AsServo() calls on ServoStyleSet
Some unfortunate bits:
* some methods of (Servo)StyleSet only accepts ServoStyleSheet while
many places call into the methods with StyleSheet, so there are many
->AsServo() added to sheets
MozReview-Commit-ID: K4zYnuhOurA
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 459e8efeb171adad089d94272e143e8c244bd279
extra : source : 65ba2f174fcf7dba4e59c00ee8908b1bd0820a48
I left some IgnoredErrorResults for now where people warn on failure. We could
consider adding a WarnOnError() thing or something.
MozReview-Commit-ID: L5ttZ9CGKg0
This patch was generated automatically by the "modeline.py" script, available
here: https://github.com/amccreight/moz-source-tools/blob/master/modeline.py
For every file that is modified in this patch, the changes are as follows:
(1) The patch changes the file to use the exact C++ mode lines from the
Mozilla coding style guide, available here:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Developer_guide/Coding_Style#Mode_Line
(2) The patch deletes any blank lines between the mode line & the MPL
boilerplate comment.
(3) If the file previously had the mode lines and MPL boilerplate in a
single contiguous C++ comment, then the patch splits them into
separate C++ comments, to match the boilerplate in the coding style.
MozReview-Commit-ID: EuRsDue63tK
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : 3356d4b80ff6213935192e87cdbc9103fec6084c
(Path is actually r=froydnj.)
Bug 1400459 devirtualized nsIAtom so that it is no longer a subclass of
nsISupports. This means that nsAtom is now a better name for it than nsIAtom.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 91U22X2NydP
--HG--
rename : xpcom/ds/nsIAtom.h => xpcom/ds/nsAtom.h
extra : rebase_source : ac3e904a21b8b48e74534fff964f1623ee937c67
nsReflowStatus::IsEmpty() assertions are added after DISPLAY_REFLOW in the
beginning of the Reflow().
A few Reflow() implementations have Reset() calls at the end which are left
in place by this patch (with an explanatory comment added to each). These
ending Reset()s are only needed for cases where a non-splittable frame
passes its own nsReflowStatus to a child's reflow method. Just in case the
child leaves a "not fully complete" value in the nsReflowStatus, the
non-splittable parent frame must clear out the nsReflowStatus before
returning, so that its own parent doesn't then try to split it.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 6Jj3jfMAqj4
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : e1fe6a775ad97e16a6d7cc224634ff962ccb0fbf
The failure mode in the attached crashtest is an inconsistency in the flattened
tree. Specifically, we null out mVideoControls in an nsVideoFrame, but defer
the UnbindFromTree call on that NAC element, which measn that its mParent still
points to the nsVideoFrame's mContent. Because all this stuff runs off of script
runners, and the anonymous content destroyer is not guaranteed to run before
other potential script runners, we end up running arbitrary script while the
tree mismatch exists. This script calls back into ProcessPendingRestyles, which
causes trouble.
We could build a separate deferral mechanism, but it's not clear that we actually
need to defer the unbind anymore. The deferred unbind was added in bug 489008,
which predated a lot of simplifications in layout/dom interaction.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 1JYAhiXKVJC
