When TV runs the reftest harness against an individual reftest, and the specified reftest
is in a sub-directory of its manifest location, the harness currently fails to run the
requested test, on Windows only. For example, the pathname in findManifest might be
"css-multicol\multicol-nested-002.xht", on Windows. Using posixpath changes pathname to
"css-multicol/multicol-nested-002.xht", regardless of platform, and that seems to work
everywhere.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32361
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
The idea is that we should only generate concreate-binding (wrap methods, etc)
machinery for an interface by default if we have reason to expect that the
interface is used as the primary interface for some objects. Two clear signals
that would indicate that are the interface being a leaf interface (with no
descendants) and the interface having a constructor. Other cases would require
a 'concrete' annotation in Bindings.conf.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32208
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
The only different part is to resolve intrinsic image size. This patch
implements explicit requirements of the spec, but an edge case is tricky.
It's not clear per spec what the intrinsic image size is for an SVG
without explicit width/height, something like:
<svg>
<image href="data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'><rect width='40' height='90' fill='red' /></svg>"/>
</svg>
Chrome treats the intrinsic size of the href svg as the default size of
a replaced element (300x150), our image/VectorImage.cpp doesn't resolve
size in this case.
We can handle this particular case in some seperate bug if necessary, I think.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32415
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Currently, `nsISelectionDisplay::DISPLAY_ALL` is used only by `HTMLEditor`.
And only when it's set, `nsImageFrame::ShouldDisplaySelection()` returns `false`
if only its `mContent` is selected. However, this is based on an assumption,
that is, when only one `<img>` is selected in an HTML editor, it's target of
resizers. However, this is completely wrong. Web apps can disable resizers
with `document.execCommand("enableObjectResizing", false, false)` and now,
it's disabled by default.
Therefore, this patch makes the method check whether its `mContent` is
target of resizers at the moment.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32449
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
- Follow Gtk and get theme button text color directly from "button" CSS node instead of "button label"
- Provide new -moz-gtk-buttonactivetext color for active/pressed button text color
- Replace ButtonText color with -moz-gtk-buttonactivetext when it's appropriate
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D30566
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
We previously (in bug 1491235) adjusted some utility code to make
layout-contained frames behave as if they have no baseline.
But that's not sufficient. To make frames fully report lack-of-a-baseline,
we now do the following for layout-contained frames, as of this patch:
(a) We now leave the ReflowOutput outparam's BlockStartAscent member at its
default value (which is what we do for frames without a baseline like
e.g. nsCheckboxRadioFrame and nsHTMLCanvasFrame). And if the parent cares
about the baseline, it'll then ask directly, using a baseline getter.
(b) We now return 'false' in more implementations of bool-returning
baseline-getter-methods (where 'false' indicates 'no baseline').
(c) We now return the margin-box-bottom edge, in the nscoord-returning
'GetLogicalBaseline()' getter method. (We typically do this by deferring
to the inherited method, which ultimately comes from nsFrame's
implementation). It's appropriate to use the margin-box-bottom edge when
there's no baseline, per the definition of 'vertical-align: baseline',
here: https://drafts.csswg.org/css2/visudet.html#propdef-vertical-align
Depends on D32182
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32183
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
In particular:
- In contain-layout-suppress-baseline-002.html, the test currently indirectly
relies on the 50px-tall-canvas being the tallest thing in each flex
container. This isn't robustly true (and in fact on windows, the textarea is
taller at 50.8px tall). So I'm adjusting this test so that it no longer has a
hardcoded flex container size and no longer depends on this.
- In contain-layout-baseline-005.html and its reference case, we need to
explicitly specify 'vertical-align:baseline' to test baseline-alignment,
because some of its tested form controls have other UA-stylesheet-provided
default values of 'vertical-align'.
(e.g. <select multiple> defaults to 'vertical-align:text-bottom")
- Also: in that same test, we need to reduce the width of the an <input>
textfield -- otherwise, it and the other elements on its line may not fit and
may linewrap, which prevents us from effectively testing baseline-alignment
on the linewrapped element.
- In contain-layout-button-001.html, the expectation was not correct. Before
this patch, the test expects that a layout-contained button will have the
same baseline as an empty button, and that's an invalid expectation. An empty
button uses a point inside of its content-box as its baseline, whereas a
layout-contained element *has no baseline*, which means that it does
'vertical-align:baseline' alignment by aligning its own margin-bottom edge
with the parent's baseline, per
https://drafts.csswg.org/css2/visudet.html#propdef-vertical-align
So, I'm amending the test to have this expectation and updating its meta tags
to reference the updated expectation and with a reference to that spec text.
Firefox fails the amended contain-layout-button-001.html test, so this patch
adds a .ini file to reflect that failure. The next patch in this series will
fix our implementation to make us pass the test, and will remove the .ini file.
Chrome also fails the amended contain-layout-button-001.html tests, and I filed
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=965740 on them with an
explanation.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32182
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This includes style system and layout update. I add 3 extra reftests
because the original tests use ray() function as the offset-path, but we
don't support it. It'd be better to add tests using a different type of
offset-path.
The spec issue about the serialization:
https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/issues/340
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32212
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
D29542 fixed the bogus checks that was making nested pseudo-elements match
author rules. This adds tests and ends up being just a cleanup, though as it
turns out we it also fixes an issue with ::slotted() matched from
Element.matches.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D27529
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
We previously (in bug 1491235) adjusted some utility code to make
layout-contained frames behave as if they have no baseline.
But that's not sufficient. To make frames fully report lack-of-a-baseline,
we now do the following for layout-contained frames, as of this patch:
(a) We now leave the ReflowOutput outparam's BlockStartAscent member at its
default value (which is what we do for frames without a baseline like
e.g. nsCheckboxRadioFrame and nsHTMLCanvasFrame). And if the parent cares
about the baseline, it'll then ask directly, using a baseline getter.
(b) We now return 'false' in more implementations of bool-returning
baseline-getter-methods (where 'false' indicates 'no baseline').
(c) We now return the margin-box-bottom edge, in the nscoord-returning
'GetLogicalBaseline()' getter method. (We typically do this by deferring
to the inherited method, which ultimately comes from nsFrame's
implementation). It's appropriate to use the margin-box-bottom edge when
there's no baseline, per the definition of 'vertical-align: baseline',
here: https://drafts.csswg.org/css2/visudet.html#propdef-vertical-align
Depends on D32182
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32183
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
ScrollToShowRect calls nsIScrollableFrame::ScrollTo with an nsRange which
will be used to constrain the final scroll position so that if snapping needs
to happen we need to ignore the given range not to constrain the final
destination position in the range.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D31948
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
I think these should hold, everything that runs under them should just schedule
other stuff to some later date:
* Synth mouse events -> scheduled as refresh driver observers.
* Scroll events -> Scheduled as well.
* Caret state change events -> Also scheduled after last patch.
* IME and accessibility stuff -> I don't think they can reenter layout.
We can always revert this if it causes troubles, plus it shouldn't crash on
release so should be fine.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D31090
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Instead, post the event for the next turn of the event loop.
In this case, what killed the frame is ActionBarHandler.jsm via
Selection.toString().
Depends on D31088
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D31089
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
ScrollToShowRect calls nsIScrollableFrame::ScrollTo with an nsRange which
will be used to constrain the final scroll position so that if snapping needs
to happen we need to ignore the given range not to constrain the final
destination position in the range.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D31948
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
The relevant definition in the spec;
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-device-adapt/#min-scale-max-scale
Before this change, if both of initial-scale and maximum-scale are negative,
both values are clamped to 0.25. Whereas with this change, negative scale
values are treated as if it's not specified so that initial-scale value is
automatically calculated based on the layout viewport size.
negative-initial-and-maximum-scale.html is a test case for the case.
Also with this change, initial-scale values are going to be clamped to the
range [0.25, 10] during parsing it so that initial-scale-0.html and
initial-scale-100.html need to be modified, now the former is scaled by 0.25x,
the latter is scaled by 10x.
(Before this change, initial-scale=0 and initial-scale=100 were treated as
invalid scale values in nsViewportInfo::ConstrainViewportValues[1])
[1] https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/6c9f60f8cc064a1005cd8141ecd526578ae9da7a/dom/base/nsViewportInfo.cpp#15,19
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32098
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
And with some tidying some comments and removing stray #include "gfxPrefs.h"
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D31468
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
gfxPrefs Live preferences are almost identical to StaticPrefs.
We leave aside for now those that set a custom change callback as this feature isn't yet supported in StaticPrefs.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D31256
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This patch contains two isolated changes related to upcoming picture
caching improvements. Specifically:
* Determine the blit reason for stacking contexts with clips
earlier, during scene building. This simplifies the code and
allows better detection of redundant stacking contexts.
* Centralize the code for pushing batch instances into a small
number of places. This will simplify the switch to adding
a single primitive to multiple batch lists, in the case of
dirty regions with different batchers.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D31898
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
ScrollToShowRect already considers that possibility, so not doing it on the
caller is a bug.
Ideally scroll observers shouldn't be able to run script, more to that in a
second.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D31088
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
It was introduced in bug 1352096 to reduce complexity with Stylo (apparently).
Right now it doesn't look like it reduces any complexity, and it's a bit
annoying with some of the patches that I'm writing at the moment.
So unless there's any objection I think it should go away.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D31708
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This will save us some time from figuring out what's the best thing to do in
bug 1552587, so that other patches I have in flight (mainly bug 1552708) can
land, since we cannot add a single byte to nsStyleDisplay right now otherwise.
The code removed here is well isolated and not that complicated, so it seems to
me that should be easy to bring back should we have an emergency (and I commit
to doing that while preserving the nsStyleDisplay size limit if we need to :)).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32026
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
