Original regression was by bug 1362858, and bug 1418629 wasn't enough to fix.
By bug 1362858, we use `CHAR_CLASS_SEPARATOR` in additional to DOM word separator. But some characters such as single quote, `@` and etc are `CHAR_CLASS_SEPARATOR`, so we may check spell by incomplete word.
We shouldn't separate word by characters that is email part, URL part or conditional punctuation.
And I also update test cases for this situation. `<textarea>` is better for spell checking since it can has multiple anonymous text nodes.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D39829
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Since JSWindowActors don't have direct access to synchronous messaging,
ChromeScript callers are going to need to migrate to asynchronous messaging
and queries instead.
Since there's no comparable API to sendQuery for frame message managers, this
patch adds a stub that uses synchronous messaging, but makes the API appear
asynchronous, and migrates callers to use it instead of direct synchronous
messaging. This will be replaced with a true synchronous API in the actor
migration.
Fortunately, most of the time, this actually leads to simpler code. The
`sendQuery` API doesn't have the odd return value semantics of
`sendSyncMessage`, and can usually just be used as a drop-in replacement. Many
of the `sendSyncMessage` callers don't actually use the result, and can just
be changed to `sendAsyncMessage`. And many of the existing async messaging
users can be changed to just use `sendQuery` rather than sending messages and
adding response listeners.
However, the APZ code is an exception. It relies on intricate properties of
the event loop, and doesn't have an easy way to slot in promise handlers, so I
migrated it to using sync messaging via process message managers instead.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D35055
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : d5707e87f293a831a5cf2e0b0a7e977090267f78
extra : source : 75ebd6fce136ab3bd0e591c2b8b2d06d3b5bf923
This seems to be regression by bug 1362858.
Actually, single quotation mark is always separator for spellchecker after
landing bug 1462858. When user tries to input "doesn't", "'" becomes separator
for spellchecker. Then "doesn" will be misspell word.
So we shouldn't mark single quotation mark as separator if user is inputting
word.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D29153
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This enables the editor directory to be linted, and fixes the remaining issues raised by ESLint. Various rules were fixed here including, no-shadow, no-undef, no-unused-vars and others.
I've generally gone conservative, disabling rules where it doesn't make sense to fix them (e.g. sometimes suggests use-services for tests, but it is only used once, or within a Chrome script).
Depends on D5585
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D5587
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
These are all automatically generated by ESLint with the --fix option.
Depends on D5584
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D5585
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Also block-disables no-multi-spaces for test_resizers_resizing_elements.html
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D5584
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
DocShells are associated with outer DOM Windows, rather than Documents, so
having the getter on the document is a bit odd to begin with. But it's also
considerably less convenient, since most of the times when we want a docShell
from JS, we're dealing most directly with a window, and have to detour through
the document to get it.
MozReview-Commit-ID: LUj1H9nG3QL
--HG--
extra : source : fcfb99baa0f0fb60a7c420a712c6ae7c72576871
extra : histedit_source : 5be9b7b29a52a4b8376ee0bdfc5c08b12e3c775a
DocShells are associated with outer DOM Windows, rather than Documents, so
having the getter on the document is a bit odd to begin with. But it's also
considerably less convenient, since most of the times when we want a docShell
from JS, we're dealing most directly with a window, and have to detour through
the document to get it.
MozReview-Commit-ID: LUj1H9nG3QL
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : a13c59d1a5ed000187c7fd8e7339408ad6e2dee6
We expose the relevant APIs on textarea and input elements anyway
(chromeonly). The QIs will throw on a non-input or non-textarea element, but
none of these consumers expect that to happen.
