TODO ==== A collection of ideas and notes about stuff to implement in future versions. "#NNN" occurrences refer to bug tracker issues at: https://code.google.com/p/psutil/issues/list HIGHER PRIORITY =============== * #387: system-wide connections (netstat). * OpenBSD support. * #371: CPU temperature (apparently OSX and Linux only; on Linux it requires lm-sensors lib). * #250: net ifaces speed. * (Linux) resource limit get/set - see man prlimit. * Process.name on Windows is slow: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6587036/ * Windows binary for Python 3.3 64-bit. * #269: expose network ifaces RX/TW queues. LOWER PRIORITY ============== * #355: Android support. * #276: GNU/Hurd support. * NetBSD support? * DranflyBSD support? * AIX support? * examples/pidof.py (same as 'pidof' cli tool) * examples/pstree.py (same as 'pstree' cli tool) * get_threads() should also return thread names in order to implement it * examples/taskmgr-gui.py (using tk). * system-wide # open file descriptors: * https://jira.hyperic.com/browse/SIGAR-30 * http://www.netadmintools.com/part295.html * Number of system threads. * Windows: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms684824(v=vs.85).aspx * #357: what CPU a process is on. * thread names: * https://code.google.com/p/plcrashreporter/issues/detail?id=65 DEBATABLE ========= * [Linux]: process cgroups (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cgroups). They look similar to prlimit() in terms of functionality but uglier (they should allow limiting per-process network IO resources though, which is great). Needs further reading. * cpu_percent(): current default interval is 0.1 so that by default it will produce a meaningful value. It represents a trap in case the user iterates over multiple processes though, as it introduces a big slowdown. Should it default to 0.0? * Rename connection ntuple's fields 'local_address', 'remote_address' to 'laddr', 'raddr' (note in accordance with http://bugs.python.org/issue17675) * Process per-cpus percent (XXX Windows only?), see: https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/psutil/ErrKTxAbu50 * Should we expose OS constants (psutil.WINDOWS, psutil.OSX etc.)? * Python 3.3. exposed different sched.h functions: http://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/3.3.html#os http://bugs.python.org/issue12655 http://docs.python.org/dev/library/os.html#interface-to-the-scheduler It might be worth to take a look and figure out whether we can include some of those in psutil. Also, we can probably reimplement wait_pid() on POSIX which is currently implemented as a busy-loop. * Certain systems (XXX figure out which ones exactly) provide CPU times about process children. On those systems Process.get_cpu_times() might return a (user, system, user_children, system_children) ntuple.