gecko-dev/dom/clients/manager
Andrew Sutherland a212459d62 Bug 1544232 - Limit lifetime extension of SWs by SWs to the sender's lifetime. r=edenchuang
This patch introduces an explicit concept of lifetimes with mechanisms
in place so that actions taken by Clients (windows or non-ServiceWorker
orkers) will extend the lifetime of a ServiceWorker, but a ServiceWorker
cannot extend the life of another ServiceWorker.

The areas of concern are:
- ServiceWorker.postMessage: With ServiceWorkers exposed on workers and
  the ability to access other registrations via ServiceWorkerContainer
  being exposed, ServiceWorkers can message other ServiceWorkers.  It's
  essential that they never be allowed to give a ServiceWorker a
  lifetime longer than their own.
- ServiceWorkerRegistration.update(): Requesting an update of a
  registration should not allow any installed/updated ServiceWorker to
  have a lifetime longer than the ServiceWorker creating the request.
- ServiceWorkerContainer.register(): Requesting the installation of a
  new ServiceWorker should likewise constrain the lifetime of the newly
  installed ServiceWorker.

Note that in cases where we would potentially spawn a ServiceWorker,
whether it be in response to postMessage or as part of an install or
update, a key criteria is whether the lifetime extends far enough into
the future for us to believe the ServiceWorker can accomplish anything.
Currently we have a constant of 5 seconds against a normal full
lifetime of 30 seconds (before 30 second grace period).  So once a SW
has < 5 seconds of lifetime left, it won't be able to spawn a SW.  Note
that in the case of install/update, we do not prevent the creation of
the job at this time, instead the job will fail during the check script
evaluation step as failure to spawn the ServiceWorker is equivalent to
a script load failure.

A somewhat ugly part of this implementation is that because Bug 1853706
is not yet implemented, our actors that are fundamentally associated
with a global don't have an inherent understanding of their relationship
to that global.  So we approximate that by:
- For postMessage, we always have a ServiceWorkerDescriptor if we are
  being messaged by a ServiceWorker, allowing us direct lookup.
- ServiceWorkerRegistration.update(): In a previous patch in the stack
  we had ServiceWorkerRegistrationProxy latch the ClientInfo of its
  owning global when it was created.  Note that in the case of a
  ServiceWorker's own registration, this will be created at startup
  before the worker hits the execution ready state.
  - Note that because we have at most one live
    ServiceWorkerRegistration per global at a time, and the
    registration is fundamentally associated with the
    ServiceWorkerGlobalScope, that registration and its proxy will
    remain alive for the duration of the global.
- ServiceWorkerContainer.register(): We already were sending the client
  info along with the register call (as well as all other calls on the
  container).

Looking up the ServiceWorker from its client is not something that was
really intended.  This is further complicated by ServiceWorkerManager
being authoritative for ServiceWorkers on the parent process main thread
whereas the ClientManagerService is authoritative on PBackground and
actor-centric, making sketchy multi-threaded maps not really an option.

Looking up the ServiceWorker from a ServiceWorkerDescriptor is intended,
but the primary intent in those cases is so that the recipient of such a
descriptor can easily create a ServiceWorker instance that is
live-updating (by way of its owning ServiceWorkerRegistration; we don't
have IPC actors directly for ServiceWorkers, just the registration).
Adding the descriptor to clients until Bug 1853706 is implemented would
be an exceedingly ugly workaround because it would greatly complicate
the existing plumbing code, and a lot of the code is confusing enough
as-is.

This patch initially adopted an approach of encoding the scope of a
ServiceWorker as its client URL, but it turns out web extension
ServiceWorker support (reasonably) assumed the URL would be the script
URL so the original behavior was restored and when performing our
lookup we just check all registrations associated with the given
origin.  This is okay because register and update calls are inherently
expensive, rare operations and the overhead of the additional checks is
marginal.  Additionally, we can remove this logic once Bug 1853706 is
implemented.

As part of that initial scope tunneling was that, as noted above, we
do sample the ClientInfo for a ServiceWorker's own registration before
the worker is execution-ready.  And prior to this patch, we only would
populate the URL during execution-ready because for most globals, we
can't possibly know the URL when the ClientSource is created.  However,
for ServiceWorkers we can.  Because we also want to know what the id of
the ServiceWorker client would be, we also change the creation of the
ServiceWorker ClientSource so that it uses a ClientInfo created by the
authoritative ServiceWorkerPrivate in its Initialize method.

A minor retained hack is that because the worker scriptloader propagates
its CSP structure onto its ClientInfo (but not its ClientSource, which
feels weird, but makes sense) and that does get sent via register(), we
do also need to normalize the ClientInfo in the parent when we do
equality checking to have it ignore the CSP.

Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D180915
2024-10-24 03:02:42 +00:00
..
ClientChannelHelper.cpp
ClientChannelHelper.h
ClientHandle.cpp
ClientHandle.h
ClientHandleChild.cpp
ClientHandleChild.h
ClientHandleOpChild.cpp
ClientHandleOpChild.h
ClientHandleOpParent.cpp
ClientHandleOpParent.h
ClientHandleParent.cpp
ClientHandleParent.h
ClientInfo.cpp Bug 1544232 - Limit lifetime extension of SWs by SWs to the sender's lifetime. r=edenchuang 2024-10-24 03:02:42 +00:00
ClientInfo.h Bug 1544232 - Limit lifetime extension of SWs by SWs to the sender's lifetime. r=edenchuang 2024-10-24 03:02:42 +00:00
ClientIPCTypes.ipdlh Bug 1544232 - Limit lifetime extension of SWs by SWs to the sender's lifetime. r=edenchuang 2024-10-24 03:02:42 +00:00
ClientIPCUtils.h
ClientManager.cpp Bug 1544232 - Limit lifetime extension of SWs by SWs to the sender's lifetime. r=edenchuang 2024-10-24 03:02:42 +00:00
ClientManager.h
ClientManagerActors.cpp
ClientManagerActors.h
ClientManagerChild.cpp
ClientManagerChild.h
ClientManagerOpChild.cpp
ClientManagerOpChild.h
ClientManagerOpParent.cpp
ClientManagerOpParent.h
ClientManagerParent.cpp
ClientManagerParent.h
ClientManagerService.cpp
ClientManagerService.h
ClientNavigateOpChild.cpp
ClientNavigateOpChild.h
ClientNavigateOpParent.cpp
ClientNavigateOpParent.h
ClientOpenWindowUtils.cpp
ClientOpenWindowUtils.h
ClientOpPromise.h
ClientPrincipalUtils.cpp
ClientPrincipalUtils.h
ClientSource.cpp Bug 1544232 - Limit lifetime extension of SWs by SWs to the sender's lifetime. r=edenchuang 2024-10-24 03:02:42 +00:00
ClientSource.h
ClientSourceChild.cpp
ClientSourceChild.h
ClientSourceOpChild.cpp
ClientSourceOpChild.h
ClientSourceOpParent.cpp
ClientSourceOpParent.h
ClientSourceParent.cpp Bug 1544232 - Limit lifetime extension of SWs by SWs to the sender's lifetime. r=edenchuang 2024-10-24 03:02:42 +00:00
ClientSourceParent.h
ClientState.cpp
ClientState.h Bug 1113522 - Expose ServiceWorker in Workers. r=dom-worker-reviewers,webidl,edenchuang,emilio 2024-10-24 03:02:37 +00:00
ClientThing.h
ClientValidation.cpp
ClientValidation.h
moz.build
PClientHandle.ipdl
PClientHandleOp.ipdl
PClientManager.ipdl
PClientManagerOp.ipdl
PClientNavigateOp.ipdl
PClientSource.ipdl
PClientSourceOp.ipdl