zach%zachlipton.com 68a56e9d2b Fix the double testing of .pm files. ... No review needed for tests at this time.		2001-11-17 17:29:06 +00:00
..
Support	We don't really need to look for fragments that are pulled in by [% INCLUDE %] or [% PROCESS %]. While removing this code bit doesn't allow us to seperatly check that those fragments exist and compile, they'll be checked atomatically when the the template that wants them is run through the process() routine by the 004template.t test. This issue was raised because bug 98707 introduced a [% BLOCK %] element and the syntax for using that is the same as for including a template fragment.	2001-11-14 03:44:07 +00:00
001compile.t	Fix the double testing of .pm files.	2001-11-17 17:29:06 +00:00
002goodperl.t	Don't rely on the TEST_VERBOSE environment variable (no longer exported from runtests.sh) and instead print to the TESTOUT file handle pulled in from Test::More. This will allow the testing backend to check for verbosity rather than having to handle it in the .t files.	2001-10-24 18:41:53 +00:00
003safesys.t	Don't rely on the TEST_VERBOSE environment variable (no longer exported from runtests.sh) and instead print to the TESTOUT file handle pulled in from Test::More. This will allow the testing backend to check for verbosity rather than having to handle it in the .t files.	2001-10-24 18:41:53 +00:00
004template.t	A few enhancements to the template test:	2001-10-27 15:27:31 +00:00
005no_tabs.t	Check templates for tabs, also.	2001-10-26 13:21:38 +00:00