gecko-dev/layout/xul
Robert O'Callahan 7c34e38876 Bug 733607. Restructure logic to compute snapped bounds of display items in layer coordinates. Moves responsibility for computing snapped bounds from within the display items to callers of GetBounds/GetOpaqueRegion. r=tnikkel
Previously we snapped the results of nsDisplayItem::GetBounds and
nsDisplayItem::GetOpaqueRegion internally. By tracking which display items were
inside transforms, we disabled snapping quite conservatively whenever an ancestor
had a transform, which is undesirable.

With this patch, we don't snap inside GetBounds or GetOpaqueRegion, but just return
a boolean flag indicating whether the item will draw with snapping or not. This flag
is conservative so that "true" means we will snap (if the graphics context has a transform
that allows snapping), but "false" means we might or might not snap (so it's always safe
to return false).

FrameLayerBuilder takes over responsibility for snapping item bounds. When it converts
display item bounds to layer pixel coordinates, it checks the snap flag returned from
the display item and checks whether the transform when we draw into the layer will be
a known scale (the ContainerParameters scale factors) plus integer translation. If both
are true, we snap the item bounds when converting to layer pixel coordinates. With
this approach, we can snap item bounds even when the items have ancestors with active
transforms.
2012-04-10 23:24:18 +12:00
..
base Bug 733607. Restructure logic to compute snapped bounds of display items in layer coordinates. Moves responsibility for computing snapped bounds from within the display items to callers of GetBounds/GetOpaqueRegion. r=tnikkel 2012-04-10 23:24:18 +12:00
test Bug 703774 Cast the result of getAttribute() as Number before comparing the values r=enn 2012-03-29 00:20:13 +09:00