mirror of
https://github.com/mozilla/gecko-dev.git
synced 2024-11-23 21:01:08 +00:00
82db67a6be
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D191480
124 lines
5.6 KiB
ReStructuredText
124 lines
5.6 KiB
ReStructuredText
Partial Update Generation
|
|
=========================
|
|
|
|
Overview
|
|
--------
|
|
|
|
Windows, Mac and Linux releases have partial updates, to reduce
|
|
the file size end-users have to download in order to receive new
|
|
versions. These are created using a docker image, some Python,
|
|
``mbsdiff``, and the tools in ``tools/update-packaging``
|
|
|
|
The task has been called 'Funsize' for quite some time. This might
|
|
make sense depending on what brands of chocolate bar are available
|
|
near you.
|
|
|
|
How the Task Works
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
Funsize uses a docker image that's built in-tree, named funsize-update-generator.
|
|
The image contains some Python to examine the task definition and determine
|
|
what needs to be done, but it downloads tools like ``mar`` and ``mbsdiff``
|
|
from either locations specified in the task definition, or default mozilla-central
|
|
locations.
|
|
|
|
The 'extra' section of the task definition contains most of the payload, under
|
|
the 'funsize' key. In here is a list of partials that this specific task will
|
|
generate, and each entry includes the earlier (or 'from') version, and the most
|
|
recent (or 'to') version, which for most releases will likely be a taskcluster
|
|
artifact.
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: json
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
"to_mar": "https://tc.net/api/queue/v1/task/EWtBFqVuT-WqG3tGLxWhmA/artifacts/public/build/ach/target.complete.mar",
|
|
"product": "Firefox",
|
|
"dest_mar": "target-60.0b8.partial.mar",
|
|
"locale": "ach",
|
|
"from_mar": "http://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/candidates/60.0b8-candidates/build1/update/linux-i686/ach/firefox-60.0b8.complete.mar",
|
|
"update_number": 2,
|
|
"platform": "linux32",
|
|
"previousVersion": "60.0b8",
|
|
"previousBuildNumber": "1",
|
|
"branch": "mozilla-beta"
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
The 'update number' indicates how many released versions there are between 'to' and the current 'from'.
|
|
For example, if we are building a partial update for the current nightly from the previous one, the update
|
|
number will be 1. For the release before that, it will be 2. This lets us use generic output artifact
|
|
names that we can rename in the later ``beetmover`` tasks.
|
|
|
|
Inside the task, for each partial it has been told to generate, it will download, unpack and virus
|
|
scan the 'from_mar' and 'to_mar', download the tools, and run ``make_incremental_update.sh`` from
|
|
``tools/update-packaging``.
|
|
|
|
If a scope is given for a set of temporary S3 credentials, the task will use a caching script,
|
|
to allow reuse of the diffs made for larger files. Some of the larger files are not localised,
|
|
and this allows us to save a lot of compute time.
|
|
|
|
For Releases
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
Partials are made as part of the ``promote`` task group. The previous
|
|
versions used to create the update are specified in ship-it by
|
|
Release Management.
|
|
|
|
Nightly Partials
|
|
----------------
|
|
|
|
Since nightly releases don't appear in ship-it, the partials to create
|
|
are determined in the decision task. This was controversial, and so here
|
|
are the assumptions and reasons, so that when an alternative solution is
|
|
discovered, we can assess it in context:
|
|
|
|
1. Balrog is the source of truth for previous nightly releases.
|
|
2. Re-running a task should produce the same results.
|
|
3. A task's input and output should be specified in the definition.
|
|
4. A task transform should avoid external dependencies. This is to
|
|
increase the number of scenarios in which 'mach taskgraph' works.
|
|
5. A task graph doesn't explicitly know that it's intended for nightlies,
|
|
only that specific tasks are only present for nightly.
|
|
6. The decision task is explicitly told that its target is nightly
|
|
using the target-tasks-method argument.
|
|
|
|
a. From 2 and 3, this means that the partials task itself cannot query
|
|
balrog for the history, as it may get different results when re-run,
|
|
and hides the inputs and outputs from the task definition.
|
|
b. From 4, anything run by 'mach taskgraph' is an inappropriate place
|
|
to query Balrog, even if it results in a repeatable task graph.
|
|
c. Since these restrictions don't apply to the decision task, and given
|
|
6, we can query Balrog in the decision task if the target-tasks-method
|
|
given contains 'nightly', such as 'nightly_desktop' or 'nightly_linux'
|
|
|
|
Using the decision task involves making fewer, larger queries to Balrog,
|
|
and storing the results for task graph regeneration and later audit. At
|
|
the moment this data is stored in the ``parameters`` under the label
|
|
``release_history``, since the parameters are an existing method for
|
|
passing data to the task transforms, but a case could be made
|
|
for adding a separate store, as it's a significantly larger number of
|
|
records than anything else in the parameters.
|
|
|
|
Nightly Partials and Beetmover
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
A release for a specific platform and locale may not have a history of
|
|
prior releases that can be used to build partial updates. This could be
|
|
for a variety of reasons, such as a new locale, or a hiatus in nightly
|
|
releases creating too long a gap in the history.
|
|
|
|
This means that the ``partials`` and ``partials-signing`` tasks may have
|
|
nothing to do for a platform and locale. If this is true, then the tasks
|
|
are filtered out in the ``transform``.
|
|
|
|
This does mean that the downstream task, ``beetmover-repackage`` can not
|
|
rely on the ``partials-signing`` task existing. It depends on both the
|
|
``partials-signing`` and ``repackage-signing`` task, and chooses which
|
|
to depend on in the transform.
|
|
|
|
If there is a history in the ``parameters`` ``release_history`` section
|
|
then ``beetmover-repackage`` will depend on ``partials-signing``.
|
|
Otherwise, it will depend on ``repackage-signing``.
|
|
|
|
This is not ideal, as it results in unclear logic in the task graph
|
|
generation. It will be improved.
|