mirror of
https://github.com/mozilla/gecko-dev.git
synced 2024-10-19 08:15:31 +00:00
e39bf77494
Summary: The behavior the WG proposed is way more subtle than what that bug implements, including: * Implementing two logical overflow longhands. * Expanding the overflow shorthand to different longhands depending on the syntax of that. Meanwhile, Blink hasn't done the swap and will ship the same behavior that we shipped in Firefox 61 (bug 1453148), that is, overflow-x, then overflow-y. So I think lacking a clear way forward we should revert this change and preserve our shipped behavior. Reviewers: dbaron! Tags: #secure-revision Bug #: 1492567 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D6317
36 lines
779 B
HTML
36 lines
779 B
HTML
<!DOCTYPE html>
|
|
<html>
|
|
<head>
|
|
<meta charset="UTF-8">
|
|
<style>
|
|
#o_1 {
|
|
position: absolute;
|
|
top: 0px;
|
|
width: 100px;
|
|
height: 100px;
|
|
background: red;
|
|
}
|
|
#o_2 {
|
|
height: 10000px;
|
|
}
|
|
</style>
|
|
<script>
|
|
function boom(){
|
|
let doc = document.documentElement;
|
|
o_2.style.MozBorderEndStyle = "dotted";
|
|
doc.style.MozPerspective = "24.5pt";
|
|
o_0.style.MozTransformStyle = "preserve-3d";
|
|
doc.style.overflow = "scroll hidden";
|
|
doc.style.textOverflow = "''";
|
|
o_0.style.offsetInlineStart = "calc(3*25px)";
|
|
doc.style.paddingTop = "calc(67108864%)";
|
|
doc.style.width = "3e-0%";
|
|
o_0.style.display = "-moz-stack";
|
|
o_0.style.position = "relative";
|
|
}
|
|
addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", boom);
|
|
</script>
|
|
</head>
|
|
<body id=o_0><div id=o_1></div><div id=o_2></div></body>
|
|
</html>
|