mirror of
https://github.com/capstone-engine/llvm-capstone.git
synced 2025-03-04 16:41:43 +00:00
Add test for an invalid requirement in requires expr.
The one introduced in D140547 was brittle. Fixing max template depth to a small value would still test the same issue without causing actual stack exhaustion. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141818
This commit is contained in:
parent
ef8cdf6d94
commit
15ad244670
27
clang/test/SemaCXX/invalid-requirement-requires-expr.cpp
Normal file
27
clang/test/SemaCXX/invalid-requirement-requires-expr.cpp
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
|
||||
// RUN: %clang -fsyntax-only -std=c++2a -Xclang -verify -ftemplate-depth=5 -ftemplate-backtrace-limit=4 %s
|
||||
|
||||
// RequiresExpr contains invalid requirement. (Eg. Highly recurisive template).
|
||||
template<int x>
|
||||
struct A { static constexpr bool far(); };
|
||||
class B {
|
||||
bool data_member;
|
||||
friend struct A<1>;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
template<>
|
||||
constexpr bool A<0>::far() { return true; }
|
||||
|
||||
template<int x>
|
||||
constexpr bool A<x>::far() {
|
||||
return requires(B b) {
|
||||
b.data_member;
|
||||
requires A<x-1>::far(); // #Invalid
|
||||
// expected-error@#Invalid {{recursive template instantiation exceeded maximum depth}}
|
||||
// expected-note@#Invalid {{in instantiation}}
|
||||
// expected-note@#Invalid 2 {{while}}
|
||||
// expected-note@#Invalid {{contexts in backtrace}}
|
||||
// expected-note@#Invalid {{increase recursive template instantiation depth}}
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
static_assert(A<1>::far());
|
||||
static_assert(!A<6>::far()); // expected-note {{in instantiation of member function}}
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user