[Sema] Do not match function type with const T in template argument deduction

From http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#1584,
function type should not match cv-qualified type in template argument
deduction. This also matches what GCC and EDG do in template argument
deduction.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45755

llvm-svn: 331424
This commit is contained in:
Lei Liu 2018-05-03 01:43:23 +00:00
parent 87f1343a73
commit 413f3c5595
4 changed files with 49 additions and 16 deletions

View File

@ -1273,6 +1273,12 @@ DeduceTemplateArgumentsByTypeMatch(Sema &S,
return Sema::TDK_Underqualified;
}
// Do not match a function type with a cv-qualified type.
// http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#1584
if (Arg->isFunctionType() && Param.hasQualifiers()) {
return Sema::TDK_NonDeducedMismatch;
}
assert(TemplateTypeParm->getDepth() == Info.getDeducedDepth() &&
"saw template type parameter with wrong depth");
assert(Arg != S.Context.OverloadTy && "Unresolved overloaded function");

View File

@ -357,6 +357,19 @@ auto DR1579_lambda_invalid = []() -> GenericMoveOnly<char> {
};
} // end namespace dr1579
namespace dr1584 {
// Deducing function types from cv-qualified types
template<typename T> void f(const T *); // expected-note {{candidate template ignored}}
template<typename T> void g(T *, const T * = 0);
template<typename T> void h(T *) { T::error; } // expected-error {{no members}}
template<typename T> void h(const T *);
void i() {
f(&i); // expected-error {{no matching function}}
g(&i);
h(&i); // expected-note {{here}}
}
}
namespace dr1589 { // dr1589: 3.7 c++11
// Ambiguous ranking of list-initialization sequences

View File

@ -796,24 +796,9 @@ namespace dr468 { // dr468: yes c++11
}
namespace dr469 { // dr469: no
// FIXME: The core issue here didn't really answer the question. We don't
// deduce 'const T' from a function or reference type in a class template...
template<typename T> struct X; // expected-note 2{{here}}
template<typename T> struct X; // expected-note {{here}}
template<typename T> struct X<const T> {};
X<int&> x; // expected-error {{undefined}}
X<int()> y; // expected-error {{undefined}}
// ... but we do in a function template. GCC and EDG fail deduction of 'f'
// and the second 'h'.
template<typename T> void f(const T *);
template<typename T> void g(T *, const T * = 0);
template<typename T> void h(T *) { T::error; }
template<typename T> void h(const T *);
void i() {
f(&i);
g(&i);
h(&i);
}
}
namespace dr470 { // dr470: yes

View File

@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
// expected-no-diagnostics
template<class _Ty> inline
void testparam(_Ty **, _Ty **)
{
}
template<class _Ty> inline
void testparam(_Ty *const *, _Ty **)
{
}
template<class _Ty> inline
void testparam(_Ty **, const _Ty **)
{
}
template<class _Ty> inline
void testparam(_Ty *const *, const _Ty **)
{
}
void case0()
{
void (**p1)();
void (**p2)();
testparam(p1, p2);
}