[SemaCXX] Validate destructor is valid for dependent classes

We didn't check that a destructor's name matches the directly enclosing class if the class was dependent.
I enabled the check we already had for non-dependent types, which seems to work. Added appropriate tests.

Fixes GitHub issue #56772

Reviewed By: erichkeane

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130936
This commit is contained in:
Roy Jacobson 2022-08-01 23:47:30 +03:00
parent 92c1bc6158
commit 508c431ed9
3 changed files with 29 additions and 11 deletions

View File

@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ Bug Fixes
- Fixes an accepts-invalid bug in C when using a ``_Noreturn`` function
specifier on something other than a function declaration. This fixes
`Issue 56800 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56800>`_.
- Fix `#56772 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56772>`_ - invalid
destructor names were incorrectly accepted on template classes.
Improvements to Clang's diagnostics
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

View File

@ -11496,17 +11496,12 @@ bool Sema::CheckFunctionDeclaration(Scope *S, FunctionDecl *NewFD,
CXXRecordDecl *Record = Destructor->getParent();
QualType ClassType = Context.getTypeDeclType(Record);
// FIXME: Shouldn't we be able to perform this check even when the class
// type is dependent? Both gcc and edg can handle that.
if (!ClassType->isDependentType()) {
DeclarationName Name
= Context.DeclarationNames.getCXXDestructorName(
Context.getCanonicalType(ClassType));
if (NewFD->getDeclName() != Name) {
Diag(NewFD->getLocation(), diag::err_destructor_name);
NewFD->setInvalidDecl();
return Redeclaration;
}
DeclarationName Name = Context.DeclarationNames.getCXXDestructorName(
Context.getCanonicalType(ClassType));
if (NewFD->getDeclName() != Name) {
Diag(NewFD->getLocation(), diag::err_destructor_name);
NewFD->setInvalidDecl();
return Redeclaration;
}
} else if (auto *Guide = dyn_cast<CXXDeductionGuideDecl>(NewFD)) {
if (auto *TD = Guide->getDescribedFunctionTemplate())

View File

@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++17 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
struct rdar9677163 {
struct Y { ~Y(); };
@ -6,3 +8,22 @@ struct rdar9677163 {
Y::~Y() { } // expected-error{{non-friend class member '~Y' cannot have a qualified name}}
~Z(); // expected-error{{expected the class name after '~' to name the enclosing class}}
};
namespace GH56772 {
template<class T>
struct A {
~A<T>();
};
#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
// FIXME: This isn't valid in C++20 and later.
#endif
struct B;
template<class T>
struct C {
~B(); // expected-error {{expected the class name after '~' to name the enclosing class}}
};
}