[llvm-mca] Emit a message when no bottlenecks are identified.

Summary:
Since bottleneck hints are enabled via user request, it can be
confusing if no bottleneck information is presented.  Such is the
case when no bottlenecks are identified.  This patch emits a message
in that case.

Reviewers: andreadb

Reviewed By: andreadb

Subscribers: tschuett, gbedwell, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59098

llvm-svn: 355628
This commit is contained in:
Matt Davis 2019-03-07 19:34:44 +00:00
parent 2ead8e8993
commit 6c5a49ccb9
4 changed files with 30 additions and 7 deletions

View File

@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
# NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_mca_test_checks.py
# RUN: llvm-mca -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=btver2 -bottleneck-analysis -all-views=false -summary-view -iterations 1 < %s | FileCheck %s -implicit-check-not 'Cycles with backend pressure increase'
add %eax, %ebx
# CHECK: Iterations: 1
# CHECK-NEXT: Instructions: 1
# CHECK-NEXT: Total Cycles: 4
# CHECK-NEXT: Total uOps: 1
# CHECK: Dispatch Width: 2
# CHECK-NEXT: uOps Per Cycle: 0.25
# CHECK-NEXT: IPC: 0.25
# CHECK-NEXT: Block RThroughput: 0.5
# CHECK: No resource or data dependency bottlenecks discovered.

View File

@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ namespace mca {
#define DEBUG_TYPE "llvm-mca"
SummaryView::SummaryView(const MCSchedModel &Model, ArrayRef<MCInst> S,
unsigned Width)
unsigned Width, bool EmitBottleneckAnalysis)
: SM(Model), Source(S), DispatchWidth(Width), LastInstructionIdx(0),
TotalCycles(0), NumMicroOps(0), BPI({0, 0, 0, 0, 0}),
ResourcePressureDistribution(Model.getNumProcResourceKinds(), 0),
@ -32,7 +32,8 @@ SummaryView::SummaryView(const MCSchedModel &Model, ArrayRef<MCInst> S,
ResIdx2ProcResID(Model.getNumProcResourceKinds(), 0),
PressureIncreasedBecauseOfResources(false),
PressureIncreasedBecauseOfDataDependencies(false),
SeenStallCycles(false) {
SeenStallCycles(false),
ShouldEmitBottleneckAnalysis(EmitBottleneckAnalysis) {
computeProcResourceMasks(SM, ProcResourceMasks);
for (unsigned I = 1, E = SM.getNumProcResourceKinds(); I < E; ++I) {
unsigned Index = getResourceStateIndex(ProcResourceMasks[I]);
@ -111,8 +112,10 @@ void SummaryView::onEvent(const HWPressureEvent &Event) {
}
void SummaryView::printBottleneckHints(raw_ostream &OS) const {
if (!SeenStallCycles || !BPI.PressureIncreaseCycles)
if (!SeenStallCycles || !BPI.PressureIncreaseCycles) {
OS << "\nNo resource or data dependency bottlenecks discovered.\n";
return;
}
double PressurePerCycle =
(double)BPI.PressureIncreaseCycles * 100 / TotalCycles;
@ -181,8 +184,8 @@ void SummaryView::printView(raw_ostream &OS) const {
TempStream << "\nBlock RThroughput: "
<< format("%.1f", floor((BlockRThroughput * 10) + 0.5) / 10)
<< '\n';
printBottleneckHints(TempStream);
if (ShouldEmitBottleneckAnalysis)
printBottleneckHints(TempStream);
TempStream.flush();
OS << Buffer;
}

View File

@ -84,6 +84,9 @@ class SummaryView : public View {
// True if throughput was affected by dispatch stalls.
bool SeenStallCycles;
// True if the bottleneck analysis should be displayed.
bool ShouldEmitBottleneckAnalysis;
// Compute the reciprocal throughput for the analyzed code block.
// The reciprocal block throughput is computed as the MAX between:
// - NumMicroOps / DispatchWidth
@ -95,7 +98,7 @@ class SummaryView : public View {
public:
SummaryView(const llvm::MCSchedModel &Model, llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::MCInst> S,
unsigned Width);
unsigned Width, bool EmitBottleneckAnalysis);
void onCycleEnd() override {
++TotalCycles;

View File

@ -469,7 +469,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) {
mca::PipelinePrinter Printer(*P);
if (PrintSummaryView)
Printer.addView(llvm::make_unique<mca::SummaryView>(SM, Insts, Width));
Printer.addView(llvm::make_unique<mca::SummaryView>(
SM, Insts, Width, EnableBottleneckAnalysis));
if (PrintInstructionInfoView)
Printer.addView(