mirror of
https://github.com/capstone-engine/llvm-capstone.git
synced 2024-12-04 20:20:54 +00:00
[ASTImporter] Fix poisonous structural equivalence cache
Summary: Implementation functions call into the member functions of ASTStructuralEquivalence, thus they can falsely alter the DeclsToCheck state (they add decls). This results that some leaf declarations can be stated as inequivalent as a side effect of one inequivalent element in the DeclsToCheck list. And since we store the non-equivalencies, any (otherwise independent) decls will be rendered as non-equivalent. Solution: I tried to clearly separate the implementation functions (the static ones) and the public interface. From now on, the implementation functions do not call any public member functions, only other implementation functions. Reviewers: a.sidorin, a_sidorin, r.stahl Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49300 llvm-svn: 337275
This commit is contained in:
parent
2ad8210725
commit
950fb5708e
@ -85,10 +85,18 @@ struct StructuralEquivalenceContext {
|
||||
|
||||
/// Determine whether the two declarations are structurally
|
||||
/// equivalent.
|
||||
bool IsStructurallyEquivalent(Decl *D1, Decl *D2);
|
||||
/// Implementation functions (all static functions in
|
||||
/// ASTStructuralEquivalence.cpp) must never call this function because that
|
||||
/// will wreak havoc the internal state (\c DeclsToCheck and
|
||||
/// \c TentativeEquivalences members) and can cause faulty equivalent results.
|
||||
bool IsEquivalent(Decl *D1, Decl *D2);
|
||||
|
||||
/// Determine whether the two types are structurally equivalent.
|
||||
bool IsStructurallyEquivalent(QualType T1, QualType T2);
|
||||
/// Implementation functions (all static functions in
|
||||
/// ASTStructuralEquivalence.cpp) must never call this function because that
|
||||
/// will wreak havoc the internal state (\c DeclsToCheck and
|
||||
/// \c TentativeEquivalences members) and can cause faulty equivalent results.
|
||||
bool IsEquivalent(QualType T1, QualType T2);
|
||||
|
||||
/// Find the index of the given anonymous struct/union within its
|
||||
/// context.
|
||||
|
@ -295,6 +295,7 @@ namespace clang {
|
||||
|
||||
bool ImportTemplateInformation(FunctionDecl *FromFD, FunctionDecl *ToFD);
|
||||
|
||||
bool IsStructuralMatch(Decl *From, Decl *To, bool Complain);
|
||||
bool IsStructuralMatch(RecordDecl *FromRecord, RecordDecl *ToRecord,
|
||||
bool Complain = true);
|
||||
bool IsStructuralMatch(VarDecl *FromVar, VarDecl *ToVar,
|
||||
@ -1592,6 +1593,14 @@ getStructuralEquivalenceKind(const ASTImporter &Importer) {
|
||||
: StructuralEquivalenceKind::Default;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool ASTNodeImporter::IsStructuralMatch(Decl *From, Decl *To, bool Complain) {
|
||||
StructuralEquivalenceContext Ctx(
|
||||
Importer.getFromContext(), Importer.getToContext(),
|
||||
Importer.getNonEquivalentDecls(), getStructuralEquivalenceKind(Importer),
|
||||
false, Complain);
|
||||
return Ctx.IsEquivalent(From, To);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool ASTNodeImporter::IsStructuralMatch(RecordDecl *FromRecord,
|
||||
RecordDecl *ToRecord, bool Complain) {
|
||||
// Eliminate a potential failure point where we attempt to re-import
|
||||
@ -1608,7 +1617,7 @@ bool ASTNodeImporter::IsStructuralMatch(RecordDecl *FromRecord,
|
||||
Importer.getNonEquivalentDecls(),
|
||||
getStructuralEquivalenceKind(Importer),
|
||||
false, Complain);
|
||||
return Ctx.IsStructurallyEquivalent(FromRecord, ToRecord);
|
||||
return Ctx.IsEquivalent(FromRecord, ToRecord);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool ASTNodeImporter::IsStructuralMatch(VarDecl *FromVar, VarDecl *ToVar,
|
||||
@ -1617,14 +1626,14 @@ bool ASTNodeImporter::IsStructuralMatch(VarDecl *FromVar, VarDecl *ToVar,
|
||||
Importer.getFromContext(), Importer.getToContext(),
|
||||
Importer.getNonEquivalentDecls(), getStructuralEquivalenceKind(Importer),
|
||||
false, Complain);
|
||||
return Ctx.IsStructurallyEquivalent(FromVar, ToVar);
|
||||
return Ctx.IsEquivalent(FromVar, ToVar);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool ASTNodeImporter::IsStructuralMatch(EnumDecl *FromEnum, EnumDecl *ToEnum) {
|
||||
StructuralEquivalenceContext Ctx(
|
||||
Importer.getFromContext(), Importer.getToContext(),
|
||||
Importer.getNonEquivalentDecls(), getStructuralEquivalenceKind(Importer));
|
||||
return Ctx.IsStructurallyEquivalent(FromEnum, ToEnum);
|
||||
return Ctx.IsEquivalent(FromEnum, ToEnum);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool ASTNodeImporter::IsStructuralMatch(FunctionTemplateDecl *From,
|
||||
@ -1633,7 +1642,7 @@ bool ASTNodeImporter::IsStructuralMatch(FunctionTemplateDecl *From,
|
||||
Importer.getFromContext(), Importer.getToContext(),
|
||||
Importer.getNonEquivalentDecls(), getStructuralEquivalenceKind(Importer),
|
||||
false, false);
|
||||
return Ctx.IsStructurallyEquivalent(From, To);
|
||||
return Ctx.IsEquivalent(From, To);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool ASTNodeImporter::IsStructuralMatch(FunctionDecl *From, FunctionDecl *To) {
|
||||
@ -1641,7 +1650,7 @@ bool ASTNodeImporter::IsStructuralMatch(FunctionDecl *From, FunctionDecl *To) {
|
||||
Importer.getFromContext(), Importer.getToContext(),
|
||||
Importer.getNonEquivalentDecls(), getStructuralEquivalenceKind(Importer),
|
||||
false, false);
|
||||
return Ctx.IsStructurallyEquivalent(From, To);
|
||||
return Ctx.IsEquivalent(From, To);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool ASTNodeImporter::IsStructuralMatch(EnumConstantDecl *FromEC,
|
||||
@ -1660,7 +1669,7 @@ bool ASTNodeImporter::IsStructuralMatch(ClassTemplateDecl *From,
|
||||
Importer.getToContext(),
|
||||
Importer.getNonEquivalentDecls(),
|
||||
getStructuralEquivalenceKind(Importer));
|
||||
return Ctx.IsStructurallyEquivalent(From, To);
|
||||
return Ctx.IsEquivalent(From, To);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool ASTNodeImporter::IsStructuralMatch(VarTemplateDecl *From,
|
||||
@ -1669,7 +1678,7 @@ bool ASTNodeImporter::IsStructuralMatch(VarTemplateDecl *From,
|
||||
Importer.getToContext(),
|
||||
Importer.getNonEquivalentDecls(),
|
||||
getStructuralEquivalenceKind(Importer));
|
||||
return Ctx.IsStructurallyEquivalent(From, To);
|
||||
return Ctx.IsEquivalent(From, To);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Decl *ASTNodeImporter::VisitDecl(Decl *D) {
|
||||
@ -2978,15 +2987,11 @@ Decl *ASTNodeImporter::VisitFriendDecl(FriendDecl *D) {
|
||||
// FriendDecl is not a NamedDecl so we cannot use localUncachedLookup.
|
||||
auto *RD = cast<CXXRecordDecl>(DC);
|
||||
FriendDecl *ImportedFriend = RD->getFirstFriend();
|
||||
StructuralEquivalenceContext Context(
|
||||
Importer.getFromContext(), Importer.getToContext(),
|
||||
Importer.getNonEquivalentDecls(), getStructuralEquivalenceKind(Importer),
|
||||
false, false);
|
||||
|
||||
while (ImportedFriend) {
|
||||
if (D->getFriendDecl() && ImportedFriend->getFriendDecl()) {
|
||||
if (Context.IsStructurallyEquivalent(D->getFriendDecl(),
|
||||
ImportedFriend->getFriendDecl()))
|
||||
if (IsStructuralMatch(D->getFriendDecl(), ImportedFriend->getFriendDecl(),
|
||||
/*Complain=*/false))
|
||||
return Importer.MapImported(D, ImportedFriend);
|
||||
|
||||
} else if (D->getFriendType() && ImportedFriend->getFriendType()) {
|
||||
@ -7621,5 +7626,5 @@ bool ASTImporter::IsStructurallyEquivalent(QualType From, QualType To,
|
||||
StructuralEquivalenceContext Ctx(FromContext, ToContext, NonEquivalentDecls,
|
||||
getStructuralEquivalenceKind(*this), false,
|
||||
Complain);
|
||||
return Ctx.IsStructurallyEquivalent(From, To);
|
||||
return Ctx.IsEquivalent(From, To);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -10,6 +10,59 @@
|
||||
// This file implement StructuralEquivalenceContext class and helper functions
|
||||
// for layout matching.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// The structural equivalence check could have been implemented as a parallel
|
||||
// BFS on a pair of graphs. That must have been the original approach at the
|
||||
// beginning.
|
||||
// Let's consider this simple BFS algorithm from the `s` source:
|
||||
// ```
|
||||
// void bfs(Graph G, int s)
|
||||
// {
|
||||
// Queue<Integer> queue = new Queue<Integer>();
|
||||
// marked[s] = true; // Mark the source
|
||||
// queue.enqueue(s); // and put it on the queue.
|
||||
// while (!q.isEmpty()) {
|
||||
// int v = queue.dequeue(); // Remove next vertex from the queue.
|
||||
// for (int w : G.adj(v))
|
||||
// if (!marked[w]) // For every unmarked adjacent vertex,
|
||||
// {
|
||||
// marked[w] = true;
|
||||
// queue.enqueue(w);
|
||||
// }
|
||||
// }
|
||||
// }
|
||||
// ```
|
||||
// Indeed, it has it's queue, which holds pairs of nodes, one from each graph,
|
||||
// this is the `DeclsToCheck` and it's pair is in `TentativeEquivalences`.
|
||||
// `TentativeEquivalences` also plays the role of the marking (`marked`)
|
||||
// functionality above, we use it to check whether we've already seen a pair of
|
||||
// nodes.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// We put in the elements into the queue only in the toplevel decl check
|
||||
// function:
|
||||
// ```
|
||||
// static bool IsStructurallyEquivalent(StructuralEquivalenceContext &Context,
|
||||
// Decl *D1, Decl *D2);
|
||||
// ```
|
||||
// The `while` loop where we iterate over the children is implemented in
|
||||
// `Finish()`. And `Finish` is called only from the two **member** functions
|
||||
// which check the equivalency of two Decls or two Types. ASTImporter (and
|
||||
// other clients) call only these functions.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// The `static` implementation functions are called from `Finish`, these push
|
||||
// the children nodes to the queue via `static bool
|
||||
// IsStructurallyEquivalent(StructuralEquivalenceContext &Context, Decl *D1,
|
||||
// Decl *D2)`. So far so good, this is almost like the BFS. However, if we
|
||||
// let a static implementation function to call `Finish` via another **member**
|
||||
// function that means we end up with two nested while loops each of them
|
||||
// working on the same queue. This is wrong and nobody can reason about it's
|
||||
// doing. Thus, static implementation functions must not call the **member**
|
||||
// functions.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// So, now `TentativeEquivalences` plays two roles. It is used to store the
|
||||
// second half of the decls which we want to compare, plus it plays a role in
|
||||
// closing the recursion. On a long term, we could refactor structural
|
||||
// equivalency to be more alike to the traditional BFS.
|
||||
//
|
||||
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
||||
|
||||
#include "clang/AST/ASTStructuralEquivalence.h"
|
||||
@ -184,10 +237,10 @@ static bool IsStructurallyEquivalent(StructuralEquivalenceContext &Context,
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
case TemplateArgument::Type:
|
||||
return Context.IsStructurallyEquivalent(Arg1.getAsType(), Arg2.getAsType());
|
||||
return IsStructurallyEquivalent(Context, Arg1.getAsType(), Arg2.getAsType());
|
||||
|
||||
case TemplateArgument::Integral:
|
||||
if (!Context.IsStructurallyEquivalent(Arg1.getIntegralType(),
|
||||
if (!IsStructurallyEquivalent(Context, Arg1.getIntegralType(),
|
||||
Arg2.getIntegralType()))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -195,7 +248,7 @@ static bool IsStructurallyEquivalent(StructuralEquivalenceContext &Context,
|
||||
Arg2.getAsIntegral());
|
||||
|
||||
case TemplateArgument::Declaration:
|
||||
return Context.IsStructurallyEquivalent(Arg1.getAsDecl(), Arg2.getAsDecl());
|
||||
return IsStructurallyEquivalent(Context, Arg1.getAsDecl(), Arg2.getAsDecl());
|
||||
|
||||
case TemplateArgument::NullPtr:
|
||||
return true; // FIXME: Is this correct?
|
||||
@ -1205,7 +1258,7 @@ static bool IsStructurallyEquivalent(StructuralEquivalenceContext &Context,
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!Context.IsStructurallyEquivalent(Params1->getParam(I),
|
||||
if (!IsStructurallyEquivalent(Context, Params1->getParam(I),
|
||||
Params2->getParam(I)))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1243,7 +1296,7 @@ static bool IsStructurallyEquivalent(StructuralEquivalenceContext &Context,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Check types.
|
||||
if (!Context.IsStructurallyEquivalent(D1->getType(), D2->getType())) {
|
||||
if (!IsStructurallyEquivalent(Context, D1->getType(), D2->getType())) {
|
||||
if (Context.Complain) {
|
||||
Context.Diag2(D2->getLocation(),
|
||||
diag::err_odr_non_type_parameter_type_inconsistent)
|
||||
@ -1294,7 +1347,7 @@ static bool IsStructurallyEquivalent(StructuralEquivalenceContext &Context,
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
// Check the templated declaration.
|
||||
return Context.IsStructurallyEquivalent(D1->getTemplatedDecl(),
|
||||
return IsStructurallyEquivalent(Context, D1->getTemplatedDecl(),
|
||||
D2->getTemplatedDecl());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1306,7 +1359,7 @@ static bool IsStructurallyEquivalent(StructuralEquivalenceContext &Context,
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
// Check the templated declaration.
|
||||
return Context.IsStructurallyEquivalent(D1->getTemplatedDecl()->getType(),
|
||||
return IsStructurallyEquivalent(Context, D1->getTemplatedDecl()->getType(),
|
||||
D2->getTemplatedDecl()->getType());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1418,16 +1471,26 @@ StructuralEquivalenceContext::findUntaggedStructOrUnionIndex(RecordDecl *Anon) {
|
||||
return Index;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool StructuralEquivalenceContext::IsStructurallyEquivalent(Decl *D1,
|
||||
Decl *D2) {
|
||||
bool StructuralEquivalenceContext::IsEquivalent(Decl *D1, Decl *D2) {
|
||||
|
||||
// Ensure that the implementation functions (all static functions in this TU)
|
||||
// never call the public ASTStructuralEquivalence::IsEquivalent() functions,
|
||||
// because that will wreak havoc the internal state (DeclsToCheck and
|
||||
// TentativeEquivalences members) and can cause faulty behaviour. For
|
||||
// instance, some leaf declarations can be stated and cached as inequivalent
|
||||
// as a side effect of one inequivalent element in the DeclsToCheck list.
|
||||
assert(DeclsToCheck.empty());
|
||||
assert(TentativeEquivalences.empty());
|
||||
|
||||
if (!::IsStructurallyEquivalent(*this, D1, D2))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
return !Finish();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool StructuralEquivalenceContext::IsStructurallyEquivalent(QualType T1,
|
||||
QualType T2) {
|
||||
bool StructuralEquivalenceContext::IsEquivalent(QualType T1, QualType T2) {
|
||||
assert(DeclsToCheck.empty());
|
||||
assert(TentativeEquivalences.empty());
|
||||
if (!::IsStructurallyEquivalent(*this, T1, T2))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -7498,7 +7498,7 @@ bool Sema::hasStructuralCompatLayout(Decl *D, Decl *Suggested) {
|
||||
StructuralEquivalenceKind::Default,
|
||||
false /*StrictTypeSpelling*/, true /*Complain*/,
|
||||
true /*ErrorOnTagTypeMismatch*/);
|
||||
return Ctx.IsStructurallyEquivalent(D, Suggested);
|
||||
return Ctx.IsEquivalent(D, Suggested);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Determine whether there is any declaration of \p D that was ever a
|
||||
|
@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ struct StructuralEquivalenceTest : ::testing::Test {
|
||||
StructuralEquivalenceContext Ctx(
|
||||
D0->getASTContext(), D1->getASTContext(), NonEquivalentDecls,
|
||||
StructuralEquivalenceKind::Default, false, false);
|
||||
return Ctx.IsStructurallyEquivalent(D0, D1);
|
||||
return Ctx.IsEquivalent(D0, D1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool testStructuralMatch(std::tuple<Decl *, Decl *> t) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user