[X86] combineAddOrSubToADCOrSBB/combineCarryThroughADD - use oneuse for entire SDNode

Fix issue noted in D57281 that only tested the one use for the SDValue (the result flag), not the entire SUB.

I've added the getNode() to make it clearer what is intended than just the -> redirection.

llvm-svn: 352291
This commit is contained in:
Simon Pilgrim 2019-01-26 21:29:16 +00:00
parent 64c3fe9103
commit a914fa4dd8

View File

@ -34901,7 +34901,8 @@ static SDValue combineCarryThroughADD(SDValue EFLAGS, SelectionDAG &DAG) {
// Do not flip "e > c", where "c" is a constant, because Cmp
// instruction cannot take an immediate as its first operand.
//
if (CarryOp1.getOpcode() == X86ISD::SUB && CarryOp1.hasOneUse() &&
if (CarryOp1.getOpcode() == X86ISD::SUB &&
CarryOp1.getNode()->hasOneUse() &&
CarryOp1.getValueType().isInteger() &&
!isa<ConstantSDNode>(CarryOp1.getOperand(1))) {
SDValue SubCommute =
@ -40716,7 +40717,7 @@ static SDValue combineAddOrSubToADCOrSBB(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG) {
// Do not flip "e > c", where "c" is a constant, because Cmp instruction
// cannot take an immediate as its first operand.
//
if (EFLAGS.getOpcode() == X86ISD::SUB && EFLAGS.hasOneUse() &&
if (EFLAGS.getOpcode() == X86ISD::SUB && EFLAGS.getNode()->hasOneUse() &&
EFLAGS.getValueType().isInteger() &&
!isa<ConstantSDNode>(EFLAGS.getOperand(1))) {
SDValue NewSub = DAG.getNode(X86ISD::SUB, SDLoc(EFLAGS),