Adding a new example of synthetic children provider

llvm-svn: 152970
This commit is contained in:
Enrico Granata 2012-03-17 02:02:03 +00:00
parent ce690f4b24
commit ab8674f99f
2 changed files with 168 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
# Synthetic children provider example for class MaskedData
# to use me:
# command script import ./example.py --allow-reload
# type synthetic add MaskedData --python-class example.MaskedData_SyntheticChildrenProvider
class MaskedData_SyntheticChildrenProvider:
def __init__(self, valobj, dict):
self.valobj = valobj # remember the SBValue since you will not have another chance to get it :-)
def num_children(self):
# you could perform calculations involving the SBValue and/or its children to determine this value
# here, we have an hardcoded value - but since you have stored the SBValue you could use it to
# help figure out the correct thing to return here. if you return a number N, you should be prepared to
# answer questions about N children
return 4
def get_child_index(self,name):
# given a name, return its index
# you can return None if you don't know the answer for a given name
if name == "value":
return 0
# here, we are using a reserved C++ keyword as a child name - we could not do that in the source code
# but we are free to use the names we like best in the synthetic children provider class
# we are also not respecting the order of declaration in the C++ class itself - as long as
# we are consistent, we can do that freely
if name == "operator":
return 1
if name == "mask":
return 2
# this member does not exist in the original class - we will compute its value and show it to the user
# when returning synthetic children, there is no need to only stick to what already exists in memory
if name == "apply()":
return 3
return None # no clue, just say none
def get_child_at_index(self,index):
# precautionary measures
if index < 0:
return None
if index > self.num_children():
return None
if self.valobj.IsValid() == False:
return None
if index == 0:
return self.valobj.GetChildMemberWithName("value")
if index == 1:
# fetch the value of the operator
op_chosen = self.valobj.GetChildMemberWithName("oper").GetValueAsUnsigned()
# if it is a known value, return a descriptive string for it
# we are not doing this in the most efficient possible way, but the code is very readable
# and easy to maintain - if you change the values on the C++ side, the same changes must be made here
if op_chosen == 0:
return self.valobj.CreateValueFromExpression("operator",'(const char*)"none"')
elif op_chosen == 1:
return self.valobj.CreateValueFromExpression("operator",'(const char*)"AND"')
elif op_chosen == 2:
return self.valobj.CreateValueFromExpression("operator",'(const char*)"OR"')
elif op_chosen == 3:
return self.valobj.CreateValueFromExpression("operator",'(const char*)"XOR"')
elif op_chosen == 4:
return self.valobj.CreateValueFromExpression("operator",'(const char*)"NAND"')
elif op_chosen == 5:
return self.valobj.CreateValueFromExpression("operator",'(const char*)"NOR"')
else:
return self.valobj.CreateValueFromExpression("operator",'(const char*)"unknown"') # something else
if index == 2:
return self.valobj.GetChildMemberWithName("mask")
if index == 3:
# for this, we must fetch all the other elements
# in an efficient implementation, we would be caching this data for efficiency
value = self.valobj.GetChildMemberWithName("value").GetValueAsUnsigned()
operator = self.valobj.GetChildMemberWithName("oper").GetValueAsUnsigned()
mask = self.valobj.GetChildMemberWithName("mask").GetValueAsUnsigned()
# compute the masked value according to the operator
if operator == 1:
value = value & mask
elif operator == 2:
value = value | mask
elif operator == 3:
value = value ^ mask
elif operator == 4:
value = ~(value & mask)
elif operator == 5:
value = ~(value | mask)
else:
pass
value &= 0xFFFFFFFF # make sure Python does not extend our values to 64-bits
# return it - again, not the most efficient possible way. we should actually be pushing the computed value
# into an SBData, and using the SBData to create an SBValue - this has the advantage of readability
return self.valobj.CreateValueFromExpression("apply()",'(uint32_t)(' + str(value) + ')')
def update(self):
# we do not do anything special in update - but this would be the right place to lookup
# the data we use in get_child_at_index and cache it
pass

View File

@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
typedef unsigned int uint32_t;
enum MaskingOperator
{
eMaskingOperatorDefault = 0,
eMaskingOperatorAnd = 1,
eMaskingOperatorOr = 2,
eMaskingOperatorXor = 3,
eMaskingOperatorNand = 4,
eMaskingOperatorNor = 5
};
class MaskedData
{
private:
uint32_t value;
uint32_t mask;
MaskingOperator oper;
public:
MaskedData( uint32_t V = 0,
uint32_t M = 0,
MaskingOperator P = eMaskingOperatorDefault) :
value(V),
mask(M),
oper(P)
{
}
uint32_t apply()
{
switch(oper)
{
case eMaskingOperatorAnd:
return value & mask;
case eMaskingOperatorOr:
return value | mask;
case eMaskingOperatorXor:
return value ^ mask;
case eMaskingOperatorNand:
return ~(value & mask);
case eMaskingOperatorNor:
return ~(value | mask);
case eMaskingOperatorDefault: // fall through
default:
return value;
}
}
void setValue(uint32_t V)
{
value = V;
}
void setMask (uint32_t M)
{
mask = M;
}
void setOperator(MaskingOperator P)
{
oper = P;
}
};
int main()
{
MaskedData data_1(0xFF0F,0xA01F,eMaskingOperatorAnd);
MaskedData data_2(data_1.apply(),0x1AFC,eMaskingOperatorXor);
MaskedData data_3(data_2.apply(),0xFFCF,eMaskingOperatorOr);
MaskedData data_4(data_3.apply(),0xAABC,eMaskingOperatorAnd);
MaskedData data_5(data_4.apply(),0xFFAC,eMaskingOperatorNor);
MaskedData data_6(data_5.apply(),0x0000BEEF,eMaskingOperatorAnd);
return data_6.apply(); // <-- what comes out of here?
}