Use Decl::getAvailability() rather than checking for the "unavailable"

attribute when determining whether we need to see an implementation of
a property. Fixes <rdar://problem/12958191>.

llvm-svn: 171877
This commit is contained in:
Douglas Gregor 2013-01-08 18:16:18 +00:00
parent 7e6a7a19e3
commit c4c1fb39d8
2 changed files with 5 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -1605,7 +1605,8 @@ void Sema::DiagnoseUnimplementedProperties(Scope *S, ObjCImplDecl* IMPDecl,
// Is there a matching propery synthesize/dynamic?
if (Prop->isInvalidDecl() ||
Prop->getPropertyImplementation() == ObjCPropertyDecl::Optional ||
PropImplMap.count(Prop) || Prop->hasAttr<UnavailableAttr>())
PropImplMap.count(Prop) ||
Prop->getAvailability() == AR_Unavailable)
continue;
if (!InsMap.count(Prop->getGetterName())) {
Diag(IMPDecl->getLocation(),

View File

@ -1,9 +1,11 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wno-objc-root-class %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin9 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wno-objc-root-class %s
// expected-no-diagnostics
// rdar://9651605
// rdar://12958191
@interface Foo
@property (getter=getVal) int val __attribute__((unavailable));
@property (getter=getVal) int val2 __attribute__((availability(macosx,unavailable)));
- Method __attribute__((unavailable));
+ CMethod __attribute__((unavailable));
@end