No, really this time mark 3034 as 'Patch Ready'

llvm-svn: 324312
This commit is contained in:
Marshall Clow 2018-02-06 03:24:21 +00:00
parent ee1f34eb9a
commit cefa05d39f

View File

@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3020">3020</a></td><td>[networking.ts] Remove spurious nested <tt>value_type</tt> buffer sequence requirement</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3026">3026</a></td><td><tt>filesystem::weakly_canonical</tt> still defined in terms of <tt>canonical(p, base)</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3030">3030</a></td><td>Who shall meet the requirements of <tt>try_lock</tt>?</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td><i>Nothing to do</i></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3034">3034</a></td><td>P0767R1 breaks previously-standard-layout types</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3034">3034</a></td><td>P0767R1 breaks previously-standard-layout types</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td><i>Patch Ready</i></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3035">3035</a></td><td><tt>std::allocator</tt>'s constructors should be <tt>constexpr</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td><i>Patch Ready</i></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3039">3039</a></td><td>Unnecessary <tt>decay</tt> in <tt>thread</tt> and <tt>packaged_task</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td><i>Patch Ready</i></td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3041">3041</a></td><td>Unnecessary <tt>decay</tt> in <tt>reference_wrapper</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td><i>Patch Ready</i></td></tr>
@ -130,7 +130,7 @@
<li> 3020 - No networking TS implementation yet</li>
<li> 3026 - I think this is just wording cleanup - Eric?</li>
<li> 3030 - Wording changes only</li>
<li> 3034 - Need to check if our tests are correct.</li>
<li> 3034 - <i>Patch Ready</i></li>
<li> 3035 - <i>Patch Ready</i></li>
<li> 3039 - <i>Patch Ready</i></li>
<li> 3041 - <i>Patch Ready</i></li>