mirror of
https://github.com/capstone-engine/llvm-capstone.git
synced 2024-11-23 22:00:10 +00:00
Revert "[analyzer] Fix taint propagation by remembering to the location context"
This reverts commit b099e1e562
.
I'm reverting this since the head of the patch stack caused a build
breakage.
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/91/builds/3818
This commit is contained in:
parent
2acead35c1
commit
d16c5f4192
@ -38,8 +38,6 @@ using namespace clang;
|
||||
using namespace ento;
|
||||
using namespace taint;
|
||||
|
||||
using llvm::ImmutableSet;
|
||||
|
||||
namespace {
|
||||
|
||||
class GenericTaintChecker;
|
||||
@ -436,9 +434,7 @@ template <> struct ScalarEnumerationTraits<TaintConfiguration::VariadicType> {
|
||||
/// to the call post-visit. The values are signed integers, which are either
|
||||
/// ReturnValueIndex, or indexes of the pointer/reference argument, which
|
||||
/// points to data, which should be tainted on return.
|
||||
REGISTER_MAP_WITH_PROGRAMSTATE(TaintArgsOnPostVisit, const LocationContext *,
|
||||
ImmutableSet<ArgIdxTy>)
|
||||
REGISTER_SET_FACTORY_WITH_PROGRAMSTATE(ArgIdxFactory, ArgIdxTy)
|
||||
REGISTER_SET_WITH_PROGRAMSTATE(TaintArgsOnPostVisit, ArgIdxTy)
|
||||
|
||||
void GenericTaintRuleParser::validateArgVector(const std::string &Option,
|
||||
const ArgVecTy &Args) const {
|
||||
@ -689,26 +685,22 @@ void GenericTaintChecker::checkPostCall(const CallEvent &Call,
|
||||
// Set the marked values as tainted. The return value only accessible from
|
||||
// checkPostStmt.
|
||||
ProgramStateRef State = C.getState();
|
||||
const StackFrameContext *CurrentFrame = C.getStackFrame();
|
||||
|
||||
// Depending on what was tainted at pre-visit, we determined a set of
|
||||
// arguments which should be tainted after the function returns. These are
|
||||
// stored in the state as TaintArgsOnPostVisit set.
|
||||
TaintArgsOnPostVisitTy TaintArgsMap = State->get<TaintArgsOnPostVisit>();
|
||||
|
||||
const ImmutableSet<ArgIdxTy> *TaintArgs = TaintArgsMap.lookup(CurrentFrame);
|
||||
if (!TaintArgs)
|
||||
TaintArgsOnPostVisitTy TaintArgs = State->get<TaintArgsOnPostVisit>();
|
||||
if (TaintArgs.isEmpty())
|
||||
return;
|
||||
assert(!TaintArgs->isEmpty());
|
||||
|
||||
LLVM_DEBUG(for (ArgIdxTy I
|
||||
: *TaintArgs) {
|
||||
: TaintArgs) {
|
||||
llvm::dbgs() << "PostCall<";
|
||||
Call.dump(llvm::dbgs());
|
||||
llvm::dbgs() << "> actually wants to taint arg index: " << I << '\n';
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
for (ArgIdxTy ArgNum : *TaintArgs) {
|
||||
for (ArgIdxTy ArgNum : TaintArgs) {
|
||||
// Special handling for the tainted return value.
|
||||
if (ArgNum == ReturnValueIndex) {
|
||||
State = addTaint(State, Call.getReturnValue());
|
||||
@ -722,7 +714,7 @@ void GenericTaintChecker::checkPostCall(const CallEvent &Call,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Clear up the taint info from the state.
|
||||
State = State->remove<TaintArgsOnPostVisit>(CurrentFrame);
|
||||
State = State->remove<TaintArgsOnPostVisit>();
|
||||
C.addTransition(State);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -784,33 +776,28 @@ void GenericTaintRule::process(const GenericTaintChecker &Checker,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/// Propagate taint where it is necessary.
|
||||
auto &F = State->getStateManager().get_context<ArgIdxFactory>();
|
||||
ImmutableSet<ArgIdxTy> Result = F.getEmptySet();
|
||||
ForEachCallArg(
|
||||
[this, WouldEscape, &Call, &Result, &F](ArgIdxTy I, const Expr *E,
|
||||
SVal V) {
|
||||
[this, &State, WouldEscape, &Call](ArgIdxTy I, const Expr *E, SVal V) {
|
||||
if (PropDstArgs.contains(I)) {
|
||||
LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs() << "PreCall<"; Call.dump(llvm::dbgs());
|
||||
llvm::dbgs()
|
||||
<< "> prepares tainting arg index: " << I << '\n';);
|
||||
Result = F.add(Result, I);
|
||||
State = State->add<TaintArgsOnPostVisit>(I);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: We should traverse all reachable memory regions via the
|
||||
// escaping parameter. Instead of doing that we simply mark only the
|
||||
// referred memory region as tainted.
|
||||
if (WouldEscape(V, E->getType())) {
|
||||
LLVM_DEBUG(if (!Result.contains(I)) {
|
||||
LLVM_DEBUG(if (!State->contains<TaintArgsOnPostVisit>(I)) {
|
||||
llvm::dbgs() << "PreCall<";
|
||||
Call.dump(llvm::dbgs());
|
||||
llvm::dbgs() << "> prepares tainting arg index: " << I << '\n';
|
||||
});
|
||||
Result = F.add(Result, I);
|
||||
State = State->add<TaintArgsOnPostVisit>(I);
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
if (!Result.isEmpty())
|
||||
State = State->set<TaintArgsOnPostVisit>(C.getStackFrame(), Result);
|
||||
C.addTransition(State);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -901,11 +888,7 @@ void GenericTaintChecker::taintUnsafeSocketProtocol(const CallEvent &Call,
|
||||
if (SafeProtocol)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
ProgramStateRef State = C.getState();
|
||||
auto &F = State->getStateManager().get_context<ArgIdxFactory>();
|
||||
ImmutableSet<ArgIdxTy> Result = F.add(F.getEmptySet(), ReturnValueIndex);
|
||||
State = State->set<TaintArgsOnPostVisit>(C.getStackFrame(), Result);
|
||||
C.addTransition(State);
|
||||
C.addTransition(C.getState()->add<TaintArgsOnPostVisit>(ReturnValueIndex));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Checker registration
|
||||
|
@ -3,6 +3,9 @@
|
||||
// RUN: -mllvm -debug-only=taint-checker \
|
||||
// RUN: 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
|
||||
|
||||
// FIXME: We should not crash.
|
||||
// XFAIL: *
|
||||
|
||||
struct _IO_FILE;
|
||||
typedef struct _IO_FILE FILE;
|
||||
FILE *fopen(const char *fname, const char *mode);
|
||||
@ -28,8 +31,12 @@ void top(const char *fname, char *buf) {
|
||||
// CHECK-NEXT: PreCall<fgets(buf, 42, fp)> prepares tainting arg index: 1
|
||||
// CHECK-NEXT: PreCall<fgets(buf, 42, fp)> prepares tainting arg index: 2
|
||||
|
||||
// CHECK-NEXT: PostCall<fgets(buf, 42, fp)> actually wants to taint arg index: -1
|
||||
// CHECK-NEXT: PostCall<fgets(buf, 42, fp)> actually wants to taint arg index: 0
|
||||
// CHECK-NEXT: PostCall<fgets(buf, 42, fp)> actually wants to taint arg index: 1
|
||||
// CHECK-NEXT: PostCall<fgets(buf, 42, fp)> actually wants to taint arg index: 2
|
||||
// FIXME: We should propagate taint from PreCall<fgets> -> PostCall<fgets>.
|
||||
// CHECK-NEXT: PostCall<nested_call()> actually wants to taint arg index: -1
|
||||
// CHECK-NEXT: PostCall<nested_call()> actually wants to taint arg index: 0
|
||||
// CHECK-NEXT: PostCall<nested_call()> actually wants to taint arg index: 1
|
||||
// CHECK-NEXT: PostCall<nested_call()> actually wants to taint arg index: 2
|
||||
|
||||
// FIXME: We should not crash.
|
||||
// CHECK: PLEASE submit a bug report
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user